IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3425-d572318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads

Author

Listed:
  • Huanping Li

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

  • Jian Wang

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

  • Guopeng Bai

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau 999078, China)

  • Xiaowei Hu

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

Abstract

In order to explore the changes that autonomous vehicles would bring to the current traffic system, we analyze the car-following behavior of different traffic scenarios based on an anti-collision theory and establish a traffic flow model with an arbitrary proportion ( p ) of autonomous vehicles. Using calculus and difference methods, a speed transformation model is established which could make the autonomous/human-driven vehicles maintain synchronized speed changes. Based on multi-hydrodynamic theory, a mixed traffic flow model capable of numerical calculation is established to predict the changes in traffic flow under different proportions of autonomous vehicles, then obtain the redistribution characteristics of traffic flow. Results show that the reaction time of autonomous vehicles has a decisive influence on traffic capacity; the q - k curve for mixed human/autonomous traffic remains in the region between the q - k curves for 100% human and 100% autonomous traffic; the participation of autonomous vehicles won’t bring essential changes to road traffic parameters; the speed-following transformation model minimizes the safety distance and provides a reference for the bottom program design of autonomous vehicles. In general, the research could not only optimize the stability of transportation system operation but also save road resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Huanping Li & Jian Wang & Guopeng Bai & Xiaowei Hu, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3425-:d:572318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. An, Shuke & Xu, Liangjie & Qian, Lianghui & Chen, Guojun & Luo, Haoshun & Li, Fu, 2020. "Car-following model for autonomous vehicles and mixed traffic flow analysis based on discrete following interval," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    2. Blumberg, Michal & Bar-Gera, Hillel, 2009. "Consistent node arrival order in dynamic network loading models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 285-300, March.
    3. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    4. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part II: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 289-303, August.
    5. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    6. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: General theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 281-287, August.
    7. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    8. Newell, G. F., 1993. "A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part III: Multi-destination flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 305-313, August.
    9. Zhang, Jianhua & Zhao, Mingwei & Liu, Haikuan & Xu, Xiaoming, 2013. "Networked characteristics of the urban rail transit networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(6), pages 1538-1546.
    10. Newell, G. F., 2002. "A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 195-205, March.
    11. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 261-276, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flötteröd, G. & Osorio, C., 2017. "Stochastic network link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 180-209.
    2. Jiang, Chenming & Bhat, Chandra R. & Lam, William H.K., 2020. "A bibliometric overview of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological in the past forty years (1979–2019)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 268-291.
    3. Wong, S. C. & Wong, G. C. K., 2002. "An analytical shock-fitting algorithm for LWR kinematic wave model embedded with linear speed-density relationship," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 683-706, September.
    4. Raadsen, Mark P.H. & Bliemer, Michiel C.J., 2019. "Continuous-time general link transmission model with simplified fanning, Part II: Event-based algorithm for networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 471-501.
    5. Seo, Toru & Kawasaki, Yutaka & Kusakabe, Takahiko & Asakura, Yasuo, 2019. "Fundamental diagram estimation by using trajectories of probe vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 40-56.
    6. Ma, Tao & Zhou, Zhou & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2018. "Dynamic factor model for network traffic state forecast," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 281-317.
    7. Canepa, Edward S. & Claudel, Christian G., 2017. "Networked traffic state estimation involving mixed fixed-mobile sensor data using Hamilton-Jacobi equations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 686-709.
    8. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Liu, Jiangtao & Qu, Yunchao & Peeta, Srinivas & Rouphail, Nagui M. & Zhou, Xuesong, 2016. "Eco-system optimal time-dependent flow assignment in a congested network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 217-239.
    9. Ngoduy, D. & Hoang, N.H. & Vu, H.L. & Watling, D., 2016. "Optimal queue placement in dynamic system optimum solutions for single origin-destination traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 148-169.
    10. Tumash, Liudmila & Canudas-de-Wit, Carlos & Delle Monache, Maria Laura, 2022. "Multi-directional continuous traffic model for large-scale urban networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 374-402.
    11. Raadsen, Mark P.H. & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Bell, Michael G.H., 2016. "An efficient and exact event-based algorithm for solving simplified first order dynamic network loading problems in continuous time," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 191-210.
    12. Xingliang Liu & Jian Wang & Tangzhi Liu & Jin Xu, 2021. "Forecasting Spatiotemporal Boundary of Emergency-Event-Based Traffic Congestion in Expressway Network Considering Highway Node Acceptance Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Zhou, Fang & Li, Xiaopeng & Ma, Jiaqi, 2017. "Parsimonious shooting heuristic for trajectory design of connected automated traffic part I: Theoretical analysis with generalized time geography," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 394-420.
    14. Storm, Pieter Jacob & Mandjes, Michel & van Arem, Bart, 2022. "Efficient evaluation of stochastic traffic flow models using Gaussian process approximation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 126-144.
    15. van der Gun, Jeroen P.T. & Pel, Adam J. & van Arem, Bart, 2017. "Extending the Link Transmission Model with non-triangular fundamental diagrams and capacity drops," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 154-178.
    16. Ma, Tao & Zhou, Zhou & Abdulhai, Baher, 2015. "Nonlinear multivariate time–space threshold vector error correction model for short term traffic state prediction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 27-47.
    17. N. Nezamuddin & Stephen Boyles, 2015. "A Continuous DUE Algorithm Using the Link Transmission Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 465-483, September.
    18. Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Raadsen, Mark P.H., 2019. "Continuous-time general link transmission model with simplified fanning, Part I: Theory and link model formulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 442-470.
    19. Ke Han & Gabriel Eve & Terry L. Friesz, 2019. "Computing Dynamic User Equilibria on Large-Scale Networks with Software Implementation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 869-902, September.
    20. Himpe, Willem & Corthout, Ruben & Tampère, M.J. Chris, 2016. "An efficient iterative link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 170-190.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3425-:d:572318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.