IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v210y2026ics0965856426001874.html

Microtransit revenue management informed by citywide travel demand and joint subscription–mode choice modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Xiyuan
  • Chow, Joseph Y.J.
  • Pandey, Venktesh
  • Yuan, Linfei

Abstract

As an IT-enabled multi-passenger mobility service, microtransit can improve accessibility, reduce congestion, and promote sustainability. However, realizing its business potential requires a deeper understanding of traveler preferences, highlighting the need for more effective tools for demand forecasting and revenue management, especially when actual usage data are limited. We propose an innovative modeling approach that integrates travel behavioral insights into microtransit policymaking. The approach operates by (1) leveraging citywide synthetic data to achieve greater spatiotemporal granularity, (2) estimating a nonparametric nested model for joint travel mode and ride-pass subscription choices, and (3) employing a simulation-based method to calculate revenue and traveler benefits under various policy scenarios. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach through a case study in Arlington, TX, one of the largest deployments of microtransit (Via) in the U.S. Using the simulation-based workflow, we evaluate alternative policy scenarios, including ride-pass discounts, event-based subsidies, and place-based subsidies, to assess their impacts on microtransit ridership, system revenue, and traveler welfare. The results indicate that reducing the weekly pass price from $25 to $18.9 and the monthly pass price from $80 to $71.5 would increase total revenue by approximately $127 per day. A 100% trip fare discount could reduce 61 car trips to AT&T Stadium during a game event while generating an additional 82 microtransit trips per day to Medical City Arlington. However, achieving these mode shifts would require subsidies of approximately $533 per event and $483 per day, respectively. A sensitivity analysis reveals that the framework’s predictions remain robust at the current adoption level, but accuracy becomes increasingly consequential as market share grows. The findings offer practical insights for microtransit deployment in Arlington, and the proposed framework is readily transferable to other cities with similar microtransit services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Xiyuan & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Pandey, Venktesh & Yuan, Linfei, 2026. "Microtransit revenue management informed by citywide travel demand and joint subscription–mode choice modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001874
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426001874
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vij, Akshay & Krueger, Rico, 2017. "Random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models: Flexible nonparametric finite mixture distributions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 76-101.
    2. Small, Kenneth A & Rosen, Harvey S, 1981. "Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(1), pages 105-130, January.
    3. Monchambert, Guillaume, 2020. "Why do (or don’t) people carpool for long distance trips? A discrete choice experiment in France," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 911-931.
    4. Hörcher, Daniel & Graham, Daniel J., 2020. "MaaS economics: Should we fight car ownership with subscriptions to alternative modes?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    5. Ren, Xiyuan & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Bansal, Prateek, 2025. "Nonparametric mixed logit model with market-level parameters estimated from market share data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Markov, Iliya & Guglielmetti, Rafael & Laumanns, Marco & Fernández-Antolín, Anna & de Souza, Ravin, 2021. "Simulation-based design and analysis of on-demand mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 170-205.
    7. Sarrias, Mauricio, 2020. "Individual-specific posterior distributions from Mixed Logit models: Properties, limitations and diagnostic checks," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    8. Xiyuan Ren & Joseph Y. J. Chow & Prateek Bansal, 2023. "Nonparametric mixed logit model with market-level parameters estimated from market share data," Papers 2309.13159, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    9. Evans, Kevin P. & Leung, Woon Sau & Li, Junqiu & Mazouz, Khelifa, 2024. "ETF Ownership and Seasoned Equity Offerings," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 1821-1848, June.
    10. Juntai Han & Ziwei Liu & Ross Woods & Tim R. McVicar & Dawen Yang & Taihua Wang & Ying Hou & Yuhan Guo & Changming Li & Yuting Yang, 2024. "Streamflow seasonality in a snow-dwindling world," Nature, Nature, vol. 629(8014), pages 1075-1081, May.
    11. Bowman, J. L. & Ben-Akiva, M. E., 2001. "Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-28, January.
    12. Calabrò, Giovanni & Araldo, Andrea & Oh, Simon & Seshadri, Ravi & Inturri, Giuseppe & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2023. "Adaptive transit design: Optimizing fixed and demand responsive multi-modal transportation via continuous approximation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    14. Giovanni Calabro' & Andrea Araldo & Simon Oh & Ravi Seshadri & Giuseppe Inturri & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2021. "Adaptive Transit Design: Optimizing Fixed and Demand Responsive Multi-Modal Transportation via Continuous Approximation," Papers 2112.14748, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    15. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387, June.
    16. Yuan, Hang & Zhao, Lei & Yang, Hangjun, 2025. "Comparative analysis of carbon emission reduction policies in China's manufacturing and transportation sectors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 159-180.
    17. Hymel, Kent M. & Small, Kenneth A. & Dender, Kurt Van, 2010. "Induced demand and rebound effects in road transport," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1220-1241, December.
    18. Hyland, Michael F. PhD & Pike, Susan PhD & Hu, Siwei & Berkel, Jacob Julius & Xing, Yan PhD & Saha, Ritun & Vander Veen, Geoffrey Hans & Yang, Dingtong PhD, 2025. "Job Access, Agency Cost, and VMT Impacts of Offering Microtransit alongside Fixed-route Transit," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt32v3x9mw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    19. Rossetti, Tomás & Broaddus, Andrea & Ruhl, Melissa & Daziano, Ricardo, 2023. "Commuter preferences for a first-mile/last-mile microtransit service in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Rath, Srushti & Liu, Bingqing & Yoon, Gyugeun & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2023. "Microtransit deployment portfolio management using simulation-based scenario data upscaling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    21. Ren, Xiyuan & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2022. "A random-utility-consistent machine learning method to estimate agents’ joint activity scheduling choice from a ubiquitous data set," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 396-418.
    22. Li, Yan & Liu, Qingfu & Miao, Deyu & Tse, Yiuman, 2024. "Return seasonality in commodity futures," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 448-462.
    23. Chipman, John S & Moore, James C, 1980. "Compensating Variation, Consumer's Surplus, and Welfare," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(5), pages 933-949, December.
    24. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2019. "A general model of demand-responsive transportation services: From taxi to ridesharing to dial-a-ride," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 213-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Xiyuan & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Bansal, Prateek, 2025. "Nonparametric mixed logit model with market-level parameters estimated from market share data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Xiyuan Ren & Joseph Y. J. Chow & Prateek Bansal, 2023. "Nonparametric mixed logit model with market-level parameters estimated from market share data," Papers 2309.13159, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    3. de Ayala, Amaia & Hoyos, David & Mariel, Petr, 2015. "Suitability of discrete choice experiments for landscape management under the European Landscape Convention," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 79-96.
    4. Villas-Boas, Sofia B & Taylor, Rebecca & Krovetz, Hannah, 2016. "Willingness to Pay for Low Water Footprint Food Choices During Drought," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt9vh3x180, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    5. Rachel Griffith & Lars Nesheim & Martin O'Connell, 2018. "Income effects and the welfare consequences of tax in differentiated product oligopoly," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(1), pages 305-341, March.
    6. Kidokoro, Yukihiro, 2016. "A micro foundation for discrete choice models with multiple categories of goods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 54-72.
    7. Rana Hendy & Catherine Sofer, 2010. "A Collective Model of Female Labor Supply : Do Distribution Factors Matter in the Egyptian Case ?," Post-Print halshs-00482492, HAL.
    8. Patrick Bigler & Doina Radulescu, 2025. "Environmental, Redistributive, and Revenue Effects of Policies Promoting Fuel-Efficient and Electric Vehicles," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(5), pages 1059-1096.
    9. Berck, Peter & Sears, Molly & Taylor, Rebecca L.C. & Trachtman, Carly & Villas-Boas, Sofia B., 2024. "Reduce, reuse, redeem: Deposit-refund recycling programs in the presence of alternatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Chenavaz, Antonin, 2026. "Adoption–usage demand: A discrete–continuous microfoundation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    11. Hynes, S. & Ankamah-Yeboah, I. & O’Neill, S. & Needham, K. & Bich Xuan, B. & Armstrong, C., 2020. "Entropy balancing for causal effects in discrete choice analysis: The Blue Planet II effect," Working Papers 309500, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    12. Tinessa, Fiore & Marzano, Vittorio & Papola, Andrea, 2020. "Mixing distributions of tastes with a Combination of Nested Logit (CoNL) kernel: Formulation and performance analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-23.
    13. Chandoevwit, Worawan & Wasi, Nada, 2020. "Incorporating discrete choice experiments into policy decisions: Case of designing public long-term care insurance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Caroline Löffler & Harald Hecking, 2017. "Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curves of the Residential Heating Market: A Microeconomic Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(4), pages 915-947, December.
    15. Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly & Richard Batley, 2018. "Revisiting consistency with random utility maximisation: theory and implications for practical work," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 181-204, March.
    16. Rico Krueger & Akshay Vij & Taha H. Rashidi, 2018. "A Dirichlet Process Mixture Model of Discrete Choice," Papers 1801.06296, arXiv.org.
    17. Xiyuan Ren & Joseph Y. J. Chow, 2025. "A data fusion approach for mobility hub impact assessment and location selection: integrating hub usage data into a large-scale mode choice model," Papers 2510.08366, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    18. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    19. Rich, Jeppe & Seshadri, Ravi & Jomeh, Ali Jamal & Clausen, Sofus Rasmus, 2023. "Fixed routing or demand-responsive? Agent-based modelling of autonomous first and last mile services in light-rail systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Georg Hirte & Stefan Tscharaktschiew, 2015. "Optimal Fuel Taxes and Heterogeneity of Cities," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 35(2), pages 173-209, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.