IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v200y2025ics0965856425002502.html

Impact of real-time information on passenger satisfaction across varying public transport quality levels in 13 Chilean cities

Author

Listed:
  • Henriquez-Jara, Bastian
  • Arriagada, Jacqueline
  • Tirachini, Alejandro

Abstract

This paper addresses the satisfaction effect of real-time information applications (apps) and their interaction with the actual quality of service of public transport (PT) in 13 Chilean cities. Our study has two methodological innovations; first, we combine a discrete choice model and a sentiment analysis conducted with a Large Language Model (ChatGPT3.5-turbo), which classifies an open-ended satisfaction question, allowing us to embed qualitative data into a quantitative model. Second, we used an objective quality of service metric (a headway reliability index, based on bus GPS data) as input in the passenger satisfaction model, which is an improvement over previous passenger satisfaction models that rely on perceived (rather than measured) service attributes only. Therefore, the model accounts for the relationship between user satisfaction, service attributes, app-induced behavior, and perception changes. The results highlight a symbiotic relationship between having access to real-time information and the PT level of service. That is, the use of real-time information makes passengers more satisfied, but the effect is greater under higher PT service regularity conditions. Sentiment analysis revealed that satisfied users (70% of the sample) value the waiting time information provided by the app and the resulting ability to manage their time. Unsatisfied users (12% of the sample) mainly criticize the frequency of service and the accuracy of the data displayed in the app. These findings promote user-centered policy making, especially in developing countries where high-quality real-time information should be more widely available. Finally, service regularity is statistically significant in explaining user satisfaction, even when controlled for the use of real-time information. This indicates that having regular headways matters to users, regardless of whether they receive real-time information about waiting times.

Suggested Citation

  • Henriquez-Jara, Bastian & Arriagada, Jacqueline & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2025. "Impact of real-time information on passenger satisfaction across varying public transport quality levels in 13 Chilean cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002502
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002502
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alejandro Tirachini & Javiera Godachevich & Oded Cats & Juan Carlos Muñoz & Jaime Soza-Parra, 2022. "Headway variability in public transport: a review of metrics, determinants, effects for quality of service and control strategies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 337-361, May.
    2. Jonas De Vos & Patrick A. Singleton & Tommy Gärling, 2022. "From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 204-221, March.
    3. Brakewood, Candace & Barbeau, Sean & Watkins, Kari, 2014. "An experiment evaluating the impacts of real-time transit information on bus riders in Tampa, Florida," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 409-422.
    4. Abenoza, Roberto F. & Cats, Oded & Susilo, Yusak O., 2017. "Travel satisfaction with public transport: Determinants, user classes, regional disparities and their evolution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-84.
    5. Cox, Tom & Houdmont, Jonathan & Griffiths, Amanda, 2006. "Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 244-258, March.
    6. Abou-Zeid, Maya & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2012. "Travel mode switching: Comparison of findings from two public transportation experiments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 48-59.
    7. Mouwen, Arnoud, 2015. "Drivers of customer satisfaction with public transport services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-20.
    8. Watkins, Kari Edison & Ferris, Brian & Borning, Alan & Rutherford, G. Scott & Layton, David, 2011. "Where Is My Bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 839-848, October.
    9. Candace Brakewood & Kari Watkins, 2019. "A literature review of the passenger benefits of real-time transit information," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 327-356, May.
    10. Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2011. "A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger's point of view," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 172-181, January.
    11. Tyrinopoulos, Yannis & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2008. "Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 260-272, July.
    12. Soza-Parra, Jaime & Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Cats, Oded, 2019. "The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 83-93.
    13. Dea van Lierop & Madhav G. Badami & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2018. "What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 52-72, January.
    14. de Oña, Juan & de Oña, Rocío & Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2013. "Perceived service quality in bus transit service: A structural equation approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 219-226.
    15. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong, Rui & Liu, Lishan & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "Impact analysis of actual traveling performance on bus passenger’s perception and satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 80-100.
    2. Echaniz, Eneko & Ho, Chinh Q. & Rodriguez, Andres & dell'Olio, Luigi, 2019. "Comparing best-worst and ordered logit approaches for user satisfaction in transit services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 752-769.
    3. Shuli Luo & Sylvia Y He, 2021. "Using data mining to explore the spatial and temporal dynamics of perceptions of metro services in China: The case of Shenzhen," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 449-466, March.
    4. Ni, Anning & Zhang, Chunqin & Hu, Yuting & Lu, Weite & Li, Hongwei, 2020. "Influence mechanism of the corporate image on passenger satisfaction with public transport in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 54-65.
    5. Fan, Yingling & Guthrie, Andrew & Levinson, David, 2016. "Waiting time perceptions at transit stops and stations: Effects of basic amenities, gender, and security," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 251-264.
    6. Park, Keunhyun & Farb, Anna & Chen, Shuolei, 2021. "First-/last-mile experience matters: The influence of the built environment on satisfaction and loyalty among public transit riders," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 32-42.
    7. Monsuur, Fredrik & Enoch, Marcus & Quddus, Mohammed & Meek, Stuart, 2021. "Modelling the impact of rail delays on passenger satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 19-35.
    8. Dan Wan & Camille Kamga & Wei Hao & Aaron Sugiura & Eric B. Beaton, 2016. "Customer satisfaction with bus rapid transit: a study of New York City select bus service applying structural equation modeling," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 497-520, December.
    9. Ittamalla, Rajesh & Srinivas Kumar, Daruri Venkata, 2021. "Determinants of holistic passenger experience in public transportation: Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    10. Jesper Bláfoss Ingvardson & Otto Anker Nielsen, 2022. "The influence of vicinity to stations, station characteristics and perceived safety on public transport mode choice: a case study from Copenhagen," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 459-480, June.
    11. Jonas De Vos & E. Owen D. Waygood & Laurence Letarte & Mengqiu Cao, 2022. "Do frequent satisfying trips by public transport impact its intended use in later life?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1245-1263, August.
    12. Wei Chiang Chan & Wan Hashim Wan Ibrahim & May Chiun Lo & Mohamad Kadim Suaidi & Shiaw Tong Ha, 2020. "Sustainability of Public Transportation: An Examination of User Behavior to Real-Time GPS Tracking Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Sun, Fan & Jin, Minjie & Zhang, Tao & Huang, Wencheng, 2022. "Satisfaction differences in bus traveling among low-income individuals before and after COVID-19," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 311-332.
    14. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid & Riza Atiq Rahmat & Sotaro Yukawa, 2021. "Factors Influencing Passengers’ Satisfaction with the Light Rail Transit Service in Alpha Cities: Evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Using Structural Equation Modelling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Eldeeb, Gamal & Mohamed, Moataz, 2020. "Quantifying preference heterogeneity in transit service desired quality using a latent class choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 119-133.
    16. Eneko Echaniz & Chinh Ho & Andres Rodriguez & Luigi dell’Olio, 2020. "Modelling user satisfaction in public transport systems considering missing information," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 2903-2921, December.
    17. Karzan Ismael & Szabolcs Duleba, 2021. "Investigation of the Relationship between the Perceived Public Transport Service Quality and Satisfaction: A PLS-SEM Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Rubén Cordera & Soledad Nogués & Esther González-González & Luigi dell’Olio, 2019. "Intra-Urban Spatial Disparities in User Satisfaction with Public Transport Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Mulley, Corinne & Clifton, Geoffrey Tilden & Balbontin, Camila & Ma, Liang, 2017. "Information for travelling: Awareness and usage of the various sources of information available to public transport users in NSW," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 111-132.
    20. Luo, Shuli & He, Sylvia Y. & Grant-Muller, Susan & Song, Linqi, 2023. "Influential factors in customer satisfaction of transit services: Using crowdsourced data to capture the heterogeneity across individuals, space and time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 173-183.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.