IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v84y2026ics0160791x2500329x.html

Using explainable artificial intelligence to envision the future of work and the workforce – from prediction to explanation

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Yu-Ling
  • Seo, Beomseok

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the future of work, our understanding remains limited, leaving us ill-prepared for the evolving workforce requirements. Much of the literature focuses on job displacement caused by artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, assuming future work consists merely of "leftovers" after technology takes over. This perspective overlooks which types of work will thrive and emerge in the upcoming future. To address this knowledge gap, the present study employs Explainable AI (XAI) on data from the Occupational Information Network (O∗NET) and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to identify emerging work and workforce archetypes, along with the most in-demand competencies, while contrasting them with those expected to decline by 2031. The results reveal ten rapidly growing work archetypes—Creatives, Sages, Wizards, Supporters, Nurturers, Caregivers, Explorers, Hands-On, Data Scientists, and Frontliners—in contrast to six archetypes facing declines across technical, operative, and administrative domains. The study further identifies eight fastest-growing worker archetypes, including Strategic Tech Workers, Workers of Technology/Engineering Design, Tech-Driven Leadership and Management, Agile Healthcare Workers, Business Analytics Workers, and Empathetic Leaders, emphasizing hybrid talents. Conversely, the four fastest-declining worker archetypes are highly specialized in the technical and administrative roles. Finally, the study outlines the most in-demand workforce competencies, highlighting the need for blended capabilities encompassing technical expertise (Telecommunications, Engineering and Technology, Computers and Electronics), human-centered skills (Customer and Personal Service, Active Listening, Social Perceptiveness, Concern for Others, Relationship Building), as well as analytical and adaptive capabilities (Active Learning, Troubleshooting, Fluency of Ideas, Initiative, Analytical Thinking, Adaptability/Flexibility). These findings offer significant implications for individuals, organizations, educators, and policymakers to navigate the complex interplay between technological advancement and workforce transformation, offering critical insights for managing the social and economic dynamics of our technological future.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Yu-Ling & Seo, Beomseok, 2026. "Using explainable artificial intelligence to envision the future of work and the workforce – from prediction to explanation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x2500329x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500329X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1279-1333.
    2. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    3. Leili Babashahi & Carlos Eduardo Barbosa & Yuri Lima & Alan Lyra & Herbert Salazar & Matheus Argôlo & Marcos Antonio de Almeida & Jano Moreira de Souza, 2024. "AI in the Workplace: A Systematic Review of Skill Transformation in the Industry," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    5. Julia Brasse & Maximilian Förster & Philipp Hühn & Julia Klier & Mathias Klier & Lars Moestue, 2024. "Preparing for the future of work: a novel data-driven approach for the identification of future skills," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 467-500, April.
    6. Alan S. Blinder, 2009. "How Many US Jobs Might be Offshorable?," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 10(2), pages 41-78, April.
    7. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue nov.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy F. Slaper, 2019. "Automation and Offshoring in Durable Goods Manufacturing: An Indiana Case Study," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-38, February.
    2. Parteka, Aleksandra & Wolszczak-Derlacz, Joanna & Nikulin, Dagmara, 2024. "How digital technology affects working conditions in globally fragmented production chains: Evidence from Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Sebastian, Raquel & Salas-Rojo, Pedro & C. Palomino, Juan & G. Rodríguez, Juan, 2026. "New technologies and the rise of wage inequality," INET Oxford Working Papers 2026-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    4. Sergio Ocampo, 2019. "A task-based theory of occupations with multidimensional heterogeneity," 2019 Meeting Papers 477, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    5. Thomas W. Bates & Fangfang Du & Jessie Jiaxu Wang, 2025. "Workplace Automation and Corporate Liquidity Policy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1287-1314, February.
    6. Nuarpear Lekfuangfu & Voraprapa Nakavachara, 2020. "Reshaping Thailand's Labor Market Structure: The Unified Forces of Technology and Trade," PIER Discussion Papers 123, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Kudoh, Noritaka & Miyamoto, Hiroaki, 2025. "Robots, AI, and unemployment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2025. "What workers and robots do: An activity-based analysis of the impact of robotization on changes in local employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    9. Colombo, Emilio & Mercorio, Fabio & Mezzanzanica, Mario, 2019. "AI meets labor market: Exploring the link between automation and skills," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 27-37.
    10. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Włoch, Renata & Śledziewska, Katarzyna & Rożynek, Satia, 2025. "Who's afraid of automation? Examining determinants of fear of automation in six European countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Fedorets Alexandra & Kirchner Stefan & Adriaans Jule & Giering Oliver, 2022. "Data on Digital Transformation in the German Socio-Economic Panel," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 242(5-6), pages 691-705, December.
    13. David Autor & Anna Salomons, 2018. "Is Automation Labor Share–Displacing? Productivity Growth, Employment, and the Labor Share," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 49(1 (Spring), pages 1-87.
    14. Thomas Gries & Wim Naudé, 2022. "Modelling artificial intelligence in economics," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 56(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Kaltenberg, Mary & Foster-McGregor, Neil, 2020. "The impact of automation on inequality across Europe," MERIT Working Papers 2020-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. Aina Gallego & Thomas Kurer & Nikolas Schöll, 2018. "Not so disruptive after all: How workplace digitalization affects political preferences," Economics Working Papers 1623, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    17. Guarascio, Dario & Reljic, Jelena & Stöllinger, Roman, 2025. "Diverging paths: AI exposure and employment across European regions," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 11-24.
    18. Qiao, Xiaole & He, Yang & Du, Qiang, 2025. "How does the urban digital economy drive labor allocation in China?—A perspective of factor mobility between digital and non-digital enterprises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1159-1175.
    19. Stepan Zemtsov & Vera Barinova & Roza Semenova, 2019. "The Risks of Digitalization and the Adaptation of Regional Labor Markets in Russia," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 84-96.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x2500329x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.