IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v84y2026ics0160791x2500329x.html

Using explainable artificial intelligence to envision the future of work and the workforce – from prediction to explanation

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Yu-Ling
  • Seo, Beomseok

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the future of work, our understanding remains limited, leaving us ill-prepared for the evolving workforce requirements. Much of the literature focuses on job displacement caused by artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, assuming future work consists merely of "leftovers" after technology takes over. This perspective overlooks which types of work will thrive and emerge in the upcoming future. To address this knowledge gap, the present study employs Explainable AI (XAI) on data from the Occupational Information Network (O∗NET) and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to identify emerging work and workforce archetypes, along with the most in-demand competencies, while contrasting them with those expected to decline by 2031. The results reveal ten rapidly growing work archetypes—Creatives, Sages, Wizards, Supporters, Nurturers, Caregivers, Explorers, Hands-On, Data Scientists, and Frontliners—in contrast to six archetypes facing declines across technical, operative, and administrative domains. The study further identifies eight fastest-growing worker archetypes, including Strategic Tech Workers, Workers of Technology/Engineering Design, Tech-Driven Leadership and Management, Agile Healthcare Workers, Business Analytics Workers, and Empathetic Leaders, emphasizing hybrid talents. Conversely, the four fastest-declining worker archetypes are highly specialized in the technical and administrative roles. Finally, the study outlines the most in-demand workforce competencies, highlighting the need for blended capabilities encompassing technical expertise (Telecommunications, Engineering and Technology, Computers and Electronics), human-centered skills (Customer and Personal Service, Active Listening, Social Perceptiveness, Concern for Others, Relationship Building), as well as analytical and adaptive capabilities (Active Learning, Troubleshooting, Fluency of Ideas, Initiative, Analytical Thinking, Adaptability/Flexibility). These findings offer significant implications for individuals, organizations, educators, and policymakers to navigate the complex interplay between technological advancement and workforce transformation, offering critical insights for managing the social and economic dynamics of our technological future.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Yu-Ling & Seo, Beomseok, 2026. "Using explainable artificial intelligence to envision the future of work and the workforce – from prediction to explanation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x2500329x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500329X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1279-1333.
    2. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    3. Leili Babashahi & Carlos Eduardo Barbosa & Yuri Lima & Alan Lyra & Herbert Salazar & Matheus Argôlo & Marcos Antonio de Almeida & Jano Moreira de Souza, 2024. "AI in the Workplace: A Systematic Review of Skill Transformation in the Industry," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    5. Julia Brasse & Maximilian Förster & Philipp Hühn & Julia Klier & Mathias Klier & Lars Moestue, 2024. "Preparing for the future of work: a novel data-driven approach for the identification of future skills," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 467-500, April.
    6. Alan S. Blinder, 2009. "How Many US Jobs Might be Offshorable?," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 10(2), pages 41-78, April.
    7. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue nov.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Ocampo, 2019. "A task-based theory of occupations with multidimensional heterogeneity," 2019 Meeting Papers 477, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    2. Timothy F. Slaper, 2019. "Automation and Offshoring in Durable Goods Manufacturing: An Indiana Case Study," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-38, February.
    3. Parteka, Aleksandra & Wolszczak-Derlacz, Joanna & Nikulin, Dagmara, 2024. "How digital technology affects working conditions in globally fragmented production chains: Evidence from Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Sebastian, Raquel & Salas-Rojo, Pedro & C. Palomino, Juan & G. Rodríguez, Juan, 2026. "New technologies and the rise of wage inequality," INET Oxford Working Papers 2026-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    5. Nuarpear Lekfuangfu & Voraprapa Nakavachara, 2020. "Reshaping Thailand's Labor Market Structure: The Unified Forces of Technology and Trade," PIER Discussion Papers 123, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Daniele Angelini, 2023. "Aging Population and Technology Adoption," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2023-01, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    7. Caitlin Allen Whitehead & Haroon Bhorat & Robert Hill & Tim Köhler & François Steenkamp, 2021. "The Potential Employment Implications of the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies: The Case of the Manufacturing, Engineering and Related Services Sector," Working Papers 202106, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    8. Kudoh, Noritaka & Miyamoto, Hiroaki, 2025. "Robots, AI, and unemployment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2025. "What workers and robots do: An activity-based analysis of the impact of robotization on changes in local employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    10. Colombo, Emilio & Mercorio, Fabio & Mezzanzanica, Mario, 2019. "AI meets labor market: Exploring the link between automation and skills," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 27-37.
    11. Gries, Thomas & Naudé, Wim, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence, Income Distribution and Economic Growth," IZA Discussion Papers 13606, IZA Network @ LISER.
    12. Eliza Forsythe, 2020. "Automation and Technological Change: The Outlook for Workers and Economies," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 21(03), pages 27-30, September.
    13. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Włoch, Renata & Śledziewska, Katarzyna & Rożynek, Satia, 2025. "Who's afraid of automation? Examining determinants of fear of automation in six European countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Fedorets Alexandra & Kirchner Stefan & Adriaans Jule & Giering Oliver, 2022. "Data on Digital Transformation in the German Socio-Economic Panel," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 242(5-6), pages 691-705, December.
    16. Thomas Gries & Wim Naudé, 2022. "Modelling artificial intelligence in economics," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 56(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Cali,Massimiliano & Presidente,Giorgio, 2021. "Automation and Manufacturing Performance in a Developing Country," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9653, The World Bank.
    18. Daisuke Adachi & Daiji Kawaguchi & Yukiko U. Saito, 2024. "Robots and Employment: Evidence from Japan, 1978–2017," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(2), pages 591-634.
    19. Florencia Jaccoud, 2025. "Robots & AI exposure and wage inequality: a within occupation approach," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1035-1090, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x2500329x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.