IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v81y2025ics0160791x25000351.html

An interval rough improved ordinal priority approach-based decision support system to redesign postal and logistics networks

Author

Listed:
  • Pamucar, Dragan
  • Dobrodolac, Momčilo
  • Simic, Vladimir
  • Lazarevic, Dragan
  • Görçün, Ömer Faruk

Abstract

Postal and logistics companies are essential subjects in the economy, providing services of the corresponding assortment for a wide range of business and private users. Service providers strive to meet the needs of users and, at the same time, make as much profit as possible. The efficiency of each of the subsystems in companies from this area significantly impacts the sustainability of postal and logistics systems. Rural areas, which are characterized by a smaller number of users and services and a low level of system efficiency, can have an additional negative impact on sustainability. As a result, optimization tasks become complex but also necessary to solve. The paper proposes an interval rough improved Ordinal Priority Approach - Power Schweiyer-Sklar Combined Compromise Solution (I-OPA - PSS'CoCoSo) methodology for prioritizing different models of solving the problem of inefficient network units. Methodological novelties are: a) A new approach for defining the lower and upper limits of interval rough numbers is proposed, which is based on nonlinear Bonferroni functions; b) The classic OPA linear model is improved through the implementation of a new concept for defining relational relationships between criteria; c) The CoCoSo method is improved through the implementation of nonlinear PSS and implementation of a novel function for the integration of aggregate strategies. The application of the interval rough I-OPA - SSP'CoCoSo methodology is demonstrated through a case study on the example of a public postal operator operating in the territory of the Republic of Serbia. Since this is a system with a highly developed infrastructure and network throughout the entire country, this further implies the applicability of the methodology to smaller systems or sectors within larger companies that deal with parcel deliveries and other logistics activities. A new aggregation function is introduced to define the compromise index of the alternatives as well as eliminate the anomaly of the original function. The simulation of different scenarios is enabled depending on the degree of risk. The proposed methodology enables decision-making in conditions of incomplete and imprecise criteria values. In accordance with the aforementioned, this approach contributes to improving the accuracy of modeling expert opinions, and consequently, in making the final decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamucar, Dragan & Dobrodolac, Momčilo & Simic, Vladimir & Lazarevic, Dragan & Görçün, Ömer Faruk, 2025. "An interval rough improved ordinal priority approach-based decision support system to redesign postal and logistics networks," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000351
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000351
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luo, Kang & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Zeng, Mingli & Hu, Weihui, 2024. "How does the development of digital economy in central cities promote the coordinated development of regions? Evidence from 19 urban agglomerations in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Liu, Zhongshan & Yu, Bin & Zhang, Li & Sun, Yuxuan, 2025. "Resilience enhancement of multi-modal public transportation system via electric bus network redesign," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Susan, Enyang Besong & Pan, Yanchun, 2024. "Trust as a determinant of green finance through information sharing and technological penetration: Integrating the moderation of governance for sustainable growth," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Moshref-Javadi, Mohammad & Lee, Seokcheon & Winkenbach, Matthias, 2020. "Design and evaluation of a multi-trip delivery model with truck and drones," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Ivana Nikolić & Jelena Milutinović & Darko Božanić & Momčilo Dobrodolac, 2023. "Using an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AROMAN Decision-Making Method to Improve the Sustainability of the Postal Network in Rural Areas," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Ng, Li Ting Wendy & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2018. "An investigation of customers’ intention to use self-collection services for last-mile delivery," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-8.
    7. Wu, Tao & Xu, Wenxuan & Kung, Chih-Chun, 2025. "The impact of data elements on urban sustainable development: Evidence from the big data policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Alessandra Cantini & Mirco Peron & Filippo De Carlo & Fabio Sgarbossa, 2024. "A decision support system for configuring spare parts supply chains considering different manufacturing technologies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(8), pages 3023-3043, April.
    9. Blagojević, Mladenka & Ralević, Predrag & Šarac, Dragana, 2020. "An integrated approach to analysing the cost efficiency of postal networks," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Li, Siping & Zhou, Yaoming, 2024. "Integrating equity and efficiency into urban logistics resilience under emergency lockdowns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    11. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    12. Tochkov, Kiril, 2015. "The efficiency of postal services in the age of market liberalization and the internet: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 35-42.
    13. Pamucar, Dragan & Macura, Dragana & Tavana, Madjid & Božanić, Darko & Knežević, Nikola, 2022. "An integrated rough group multicriteria decision-making model for the ex-ante prioritization of infrastructure projects: The Serbian Railways case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Amanda, Citra, 2023. "Rural banking spatial competition and stability," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 492-504.
    15. Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane & Qiu, Yanjun & Stević, Željko & Simić, Vladimir, 2023. "Assessment of alternative railway systems for sustainable transportation using an integrated IRN SWARA and IRN CoCoSo model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Prencipe, Luigi Pio & Colovic, Aleksandra & Binetti, Mario & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2024. "Zero-emission vehicle adoption towards sustainable e-grocery last-mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Weijie & Feng, Hanrui & Guo, Zeyu & Jia, Huating & Li, Yue & Luo, Xinyue & Ran, Siwei & Zhang, Hanming & Zhou, Ziyu & Yuan, Jiakai & Liu, Jiaxin & Sun, Shijie & Chen, Faan, 2024. "Machine learning embedded hybrid MCDM model to mitigate decision uncertainty in transport safety planning for OAS countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Xuemei Chen & Bin Zhou & Anđelka Štilić & Željko Stević & Adis Puška, 2023. "A Fuzzy–Rough MCDM Approach for Selecting Green Suppliers in the Furniture Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study of Eco-Friendly Material Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Zorlu, Kuttusi & Dede, Volkan & Öztürk, Yahya & Çorba, Burçin Şeyda & Kopar, İbrahim & Serin, Soner, 2025. "An approach to assessment of geoheritage elements determined in the Upper Aras Basin (NE Türkiye) as resources: A decision-making model based on Interval Rough Numbers (IRNs)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Bakioglu, Gozde, 2024. "Selection of sustainable transportation strategies for campuses using hybrid decision-making approach under picture fuzzy sets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Milioti, Christina & Pramatari, Katerina & Kelepouri, Ioanna, 2020. "Modelling consumers’ acceptance for the click and collect service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    6. Francisco Salas-Molina & Filippo Bistaffa & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, 2024. "A General Approach for Computing a Consensus in Group Decision Making That Integrates Multiple Ethical Principles," Papers 2401.07818, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    7. Juan Guillermo Urzúa-Morales & Juan Pedro Sepulveda-Rojas & Miguel Alfaro & Guillermo Fuertes & Rodrigo Ternero & Manuel Vargas, 2020. "Logistic Modeling of the Last Mile: Case Study Santiago, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Anca POPESCU & Adriana TULBURE, 2024. "Revolutionizing Urban Last-Mile Delivery With Automated Parcel Lockers: An Overview," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 317-327, December.
    9. Lin, Yun Hui & Wang, Yuan & He, Dongdong & Lee, Loo Hay, 2020. "Last-mile delivery: Optimal locker location under multinomial logit choice model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Yuen, Kum Fai & Chua, Jie Ying & Li, Xue & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "The determinants of users’ intention to adopt telehealth: Health belief, perceived value and self-determination perspectives," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Valipour Malakshah, Mohammad Reza & Amini, Zahra, 2026. "Intersection importance assessment for an operationally resilient urban traffic network: A multi-criteria decision-making-based framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 266(PA).
    12. Samani, Ali Riahi & Talebian, Ahmadreza & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Golias, Mihalis, 2025. "Evaluating consumer shopping, delivery demands, and last-mile preferences: An integrated MDCEV-HCM approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Mommens, Koen & Buldeo Rai, Heleen & van Lier, Tom & Macharis, Cathy, 2021. "Delivery to homes or collection points? A sustainability analysis for urban, urbanised and rural areas in Belgium," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Dayal, Eshwar & Khuntia, Lisa & Lakshay, Lakshay & Buldeo Rai, Heleen & Pani, Agnivesh, 2025. "Behavioral intention to use parcel lockers in the last mile and underlying linkages with travel modal choice," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Qian, Lixian & Yin, Juelin & Huang, Youlin & Liang, Ya, 2023. "The role of values and ethics in influencing consumers’ intention to use autonomous vehicle hailing services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Luigi Di Puglia Pugliese & Francesca Guerriero & Maria Grazia Scutellá, 2021. "The Last-Mile Delivery Process with Trucks and Drones Under Uncertain Energy Consumption," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 31-67, October.
    18. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud, 2023. "Evaluating the risks of the internet of things in renewable energy systems using a hybrid fuzzy decision approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    19. Yang Xia & Wenjia Zeng & Xinjie Xing & Yuanzhu Zhan & Kim Hua Tan & Ajay Kumar, 2023. "Joint optimisation of drone routing and battery wear for sustainable supply chain development: a mixed-integer programming model based on blockchain-enabled fleet sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 89-127, August.
    20. Jamshidian, Fatemeh & Yaghoubi, Saeed & Sadeghi, Mohammad, 2025. "Recursive delivery multiple flying sidekicks traveling salesman problem: An enlightenment of the Covid-19 pandemic," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.