IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v81y2025ics0160791x24003464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding students’ technology acceptance behaviour: A meta-analytic study

Author

Listed:
  • Santini, Fernando de Oliveira
  • Sampaio, Claudio Hoffmann
  • Rasul, Tareq
  • Ladeira, Wagner Junior
  • Kar, Arpan Kumar
  • Perin, Marcelo Gattermann
  • Azhar, Mohd

Abstract

Students' acceptance of various technologies in their learning process has long been of interest to academics and practitioners. Amongst other models, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has predominated in this area. Nevertheless, there has not been a single empirical study that has analyzed and compiled the results of all these TAM-based studies. As a result, we perform a comprehensive meta-analysis and apply Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling (MASEM) for a conceptual framework to assess an effect size of 2462 and a total sample size of 158,096 from 299 primary studies. Our findings reveal that enjoyment is the most prominent antecedent of TAM that plays a critical role in students’ technology acceptance behavior. Further, several methodological, cultural, and contextual moderators were confirmed. We then address the implications of these findings for both research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Santini, Fernando de Oliveira & Sampaio, Claudio Hoffmann & Rasul, Tareq & Ladeira, Wagner Junior & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Perin, Marcelo Gattermann & Azhar, Mohd, 2025. "Understanding students’ technology acceptance behaviour: A meta-analytic study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x24003464
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24003464
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando Santini & Wagner Junior Ladeira & Diego Costa Pinto & Márcia Maurer Herter & Claudio Hoffmann Sampaio & Barry J. Babin, 2020. "Customer engagement in social media: a framework and meta-analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1211-1228, November.
    2. Kamal, Syeda Ayesha & Shafiq, Muhammad & Kakria, Priyanka, 2020. "Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Donald Bergh & Herman Aguinis & Ciaran Heavey & David Ketchen & Brian Boyd & Peiran Su & Cubie Lau & Harry Joo, 2016. "Using meta‐analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership‐performance relationship," Post-Print hal-04686335, HAL.
    4. Geert Hofstede, 2010. "The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(8), pages 1339-1346, October.
    5. Inman, J. Jeffrey & Nikolova, Hristina, 2017. "Shopper-Facing Retail Technology: A Retailer Adoption Decision Framework Incorporating Shopper Attitudes and Privacy Concerns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 7-28.
    6. Fern, Edward F & Monroe, Kent B, 1996. "Effect-Size Estimates: Issues and Problems in Interpretation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 23(2), pages 89-105, September.
    7. John Hulland & Mark B. Houston, 2020. "Why systematic review papers and meta-analyses matter: an introduction to the special issue on generalizations in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 351-359, May.
    8. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    9. Xiaotao Zhang & Abiodun Oluyomi & LeChauncy Woodard & Syed Ahsan Raza & Maral Adel Fahmideh & Ola El-Mubasher & Jinyoung Byun & Younghun Han & Christopher I. Amos & Hoda Badr, 2021. "Individual-Level Determinants of Lifestyle Behavioral Changes during COVID-19 Lockdown in the United States: Results of an Online Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq & Kumar, Satish & Ala, Mamun, 2022. "Past, present, and future of customer engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 439-458.
    11. Ahmad Amer & Wajeeh Daher, 2019. "Moodle quizzes as a teaching tool in English for academic purposes course," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(1), pages 35-49.
    12. Francisco Javier Lacarcel & Raquel Huete, 2023. "Digital communication strategies used by private companies, entrepreneurs, and public entities to attract long-stay tourists: a review," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 691-708, June.
    13. Jose Ramon Saura & Daniel Palacios-Marqués & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2023. "Leveraging SMEs technologies adoption in the Covid-19 pandemic: a case study on Twitter-based user-generated content," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1696-1722, October.
    14. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    15. Fernando de Oliveira Santini & Wagner Junior Ladeira & Claudio Hoffmann Sampaio & Gustavo da Silva Costa, 2017. "Student satisfaction in higher education: a meta-analytic study," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Donald D. Bergh & Herman Aguinis & Ciaran Heavey & David J. Ketchen & Brian K. Boyd & Peiran Su & Cubie L. L. Lau & Harry Joo, 2016. "Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 477-497, March.
    17. James G. Combs & T. Russell Crook & Andreas Rauch, 2019. "Meta‐Analytic Research in Management: Contemporary Approaches, Unresolved Controversies, and Rising Standards," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mukta Srivastava & S. Abhishek & Neeraj Pandey, 2025. "Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) and customer brand engagement (CBE): Do they really go hand-in-hand?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1865-1933, June.
    2. Michael Addotey-Delove & Richard E. Scott & Maurice Mars, 2023. "Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Jinjiang Cai & Jingjing Wu & Hongjie Zhang & Yifei Cai, 2023. "Research on the Influence Mechanism of Fashion Brands’ Crossover Alliance on Consumers’ Online Brand Engagement: The Mediating Effect of Hedonic Perception and Novelty Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Cobelli, Nicola & Cassia, Fabio & Donvito, Raffaele, 2023. "Pharmacists' attitudes and intention to adopt telemedicine: Integrating the market-orientation paradigm and the UTAUT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "Culturally Informed Technology: Assessing Its Importance in the Transition to Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    7. Kotiloglu, Serhan & Blettner, Daniela & Lechler, Thomas G., 2024. "Integrating national culture into the organizational performance feedback theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 327-347.
    8. Dhruv Grewal & Stephanie M. Noble & Anne L. Roggeveen & Jens Nordfalt, 2020. "The future of in-store technology," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 96-113, January.
    9. Sharma, Wamika & Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Verma, Aastha & Kumra, Rajeev, 2024. "Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Yung-Tsan Jou & Klint Allen Mariñas & Charmine Sheena Saflor & Michael Nayat Young, 2022. "Investigating Accessibility of Social Security System (SSS) Mobile Application: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Renata Walczak & Magdalena Kludacz-Alessandri & Liliana Hawrysz, 2022. "Use of Telemedicine Technology among General Practitioners during COVID-19: A Modified Technology Acceptance Model Study in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Cheah, Chee Wei & Koay, Kian Yeik & Lim, Weng Marc, 2024. "Social media influencer over-endorsement: Implications from a moderated-mediation analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. repec:osf:osfxxx:hq4uw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Hu, Sangen & Li, Chun & Wu, Weitiao & Yang, Ying, 2025. "Exploring the determinants of demand-responsive transit acceptance in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 150-163.
    15. Geyer-Klingeberg, Jerome & Hang, Markus & Rathgeber, Andreas, 2020. "Meta-analysis in finance research: Opportunities, challenges, and contemporary applications," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Christian Theres & Stefan Strohmeier, 2024. "Consolidating the theoretical foundations of digital human resource management acceptance and use research: a meta-analytic validation of UTAUT," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2683-2715, December.
    17. Sabakun Naher Shetu, 2023. "Do user-generated content and micro-celebrity posts encourage generation Z users to search online shopping behavior on social networking sites—the moderating role of sponsored ads," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Saha, Sajeeb & Ranjan, Kumar Rakesh & Pappu, Ravi & Akhlaghpour, Saeed, 2023. "Corporate giving and its impact on consumer evaluations: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Williams, David W. & Crook, T. Russell, 2021. "Unpacking the age at initial internationalization-performance relationship: A meta-analytic investigation," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    20. Sestino, Andrea & D'Angelo, Alfredo, 2024. "Elderly patients' reactions to gamification-based digital therapeutics (DTx): The relevance of socialization tendency seeking," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    21. Yatish Joshi & Weng Marc Lim & Khyati Jagani & Satish Kumar, 2025. "Social media influencer marketing: foundations, trends, and ways forward," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1199-1253, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x24003464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.