IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v78y2024ics0160791x24002379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robotic companions and healthy aging: A mixed-methods exploration of older adults' perspectives and insights

Author

Listed:
  • Esmaeilzadeh, Pouyan
  • Maddah, Mahed

Abstract

This study investigates older adults' perceptions and opinions regarding companion robots, contributing to the understanding of the benefits and risks associated with technology designed for senior users. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we first conducted qualitative research to explore key concepts and variables, followed by quantitative testing of the proposed model. The qualitative phase involved online interviews with 182 participants aged 55 or older. Data were analyzed using NVivo software, employing thematic analysis to identify conceptually similar themes. Six primary themes emerged, categorized into perceived benefits (health and wellness, companionship and support, and technology design advantages) and perceived risks (digital dependency and social disconnection, information integrity and online resilience, and implementation costs). Based on the qualitative findings, we developed a research model comprising six hypotheses. The model was subsequently tested quantitatively using structural equation modeling via AMOS with data from 313 adults aged 55 or older. All hypotheses were supported, with the model demonstrating an explanatory power of 56 %. Results indicate that while companion robots offer potential social and emotional support for older adults, they also present significant challenges. The study highlights the importance of balancing the advantages of companion robots with their potential drawbacks. These findings have implications for the design and implementation of smart healthcare devices for older populations, suggesting that maximizing benefits while mitigating risks could enhance adoption and utilization. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on Age technology, offering insights for researchers, technology designers, and healthcare providers working to improve the quality of life for older adults through technological innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Esmaeilzadeh, Pouyan & Maddah, Mahed, 2024. "Robotic companions and healthy aging: A mixed-methods exploration of older adults' perspectives and insights," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24002379
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002379
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lutz Bornmann & Rüdiger Mutz & Hans-Dieter Daniel, 2010. "A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Sukkird, Vatcharapong & Shirahada, Kunio, 2015. "Technology challenges to healthcare service innovation in aging Asia: Case of value co-creation in emergency medical support system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 122-128.
    3. Elimelech, Ortal Cohen & Ferrante, Simona & Josman, Naomi & Meyer, Sonya & Lunardini, Francesca & Gómez-Raja, Jonathan & Galán, Carmen & Cáceres, Pilar & Sciama, Piera & Gros, Marianne & Vurro, Clodia, 2022. "Technology use characteristics among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-cultural survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Coltman, Tim & Devinney, Timothy M. & Midgley, David F. & Venaik, Sunil, 2008. "Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1250-1262, December.
    5. Park, Sunhee & Kim, Beomsoo, 2022. "The impact of everyday AI-based smart speaker use on the well-being of older adults living alone," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Obayashi, Kazuko & Kodate, Naonori & Masuyama, Shigeru, 2020. "Can connected technologies improve sleep quality and safety of older adults and care-givers? An evaluation study of sleep monitors and communicative robots at a residential care home in Japan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Hong, Seokho & Jang, Eunha & Cho, Jihyeon & Lee, Junsoo & Rhee, Jee Heon & Lee, Hyeongseok & Lee, Miyoung & Cha, Seung Hyun & Koo, Choongwan & Baik, Ok Mi & Heo, Yeonsook, 2024. "A living lab to develop smart home services for the residential welfare of older adults," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Alexander Seifert & Shelia R Cotten & Bo Xie & Deborah Carr, 2021. "A Double Burden of Exclusion? Digital and Social Exclusion of Older Adults in Times of COVID-19 [Attitudes towards and limitations to ICT use in assisted and independent living communities: Finding," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(3), pages 99-103.
    9. Temple Jones, Chelsea & Rice, Carla & Lam, Margaret & Chandler, Eliza & Jiwon Lee, Karen, 2021. "Toward TechnoAccess: A narrative review of disabled and aging experiences of using technology to access the arts," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Adriana ZAIT & Patricea Elena BERTEA, 2011. "Methods For Testing Discriminant Validity," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 217-224, November.
    11. Park, Hyeyoung K. & Chung, Joohyun & Ha, Jiyeon, 2023. "Acceptance of technology related to healthcare among older Korean adults in rural areas: A mixed-method study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Justine Jihyun & Lee, Jongsu & Shin, Jungwoo & He, Meihan, 2022. "How are high-tech assistive devices valued in an aging society? Exploring the use and non-use values of equipment that aid limb disability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Park, Hyeyoung K. & Chung, Joohyun & Ha, Jiyeon, 2023. "Acceptance of technology related to healthcare among older Korean adults in rural areas: A mixed-method study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Wilson-Nash, Carolyn & Pavlopoulou, Ismini & McCabe, Louise & Gibson, Grant, 2024. "Towards an evaluation framework for inclusive technological innovation in social and health care services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Bhumika Gupta & Salil K. Sen, 2019. "Carbon Capture Usage and Storage with Scale-up: Energy Finance through Bricolage Deploying the Co-integration Methodology," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 146-153.
    5. Rajesh Srivastava & Thomas Tang, 2015. "Coping Intelligence: Coping Strategies and Organizational Commitment Among Boundary Spanning Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 525-542, September.
    6. Claudio Vitari & Elisabetta Raguseo, 2016. "Digital data, dynamic capability and financial performance: an empirical investigation in the era of Big Data," Post-Print halshs-01923271, HAL.
    7. Hsu, Dan K. & Burmeister-Lamp, Katrin & Simmons, Sharon A. & Foo, Maw-Der & Hong, Michelle C. & Pipes, Jesse D., 2019. "“I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 311-326.
    8. Joseph A Crawford & Sarah Dawkins & Angela Martin & Gemma Lewis, 2020. "Putting the leader back into authentic leadership: Reconceptualising and rethinking leaders," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(1), pages 114-133, February.
    9. Samy Katumba & Julia Kadt & Mark Orkin & Paul Fatti, 2022. "Construction of a Reflective Quality of Life Index for Gauteng Province in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 373-408, November.
    10. Anna Jasinenko & Josephina Steuber, 2023. "Perceived Organizational Purpose: Systematic Literature Review, Construct Definition, Measurement and Potential Employee Outcomes," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1415-1447, September.
    11. Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina & Ylenia I. Naranjo-Barrera & Jesús B. Alonso & Julio Francisco Rufo Torres, 2018. "Predicting Thalasso Tourist Delight: A Hybrid SEM—Artificial Intelligence Analysis," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, October.
    12. Anupam Singh & Priyanka Verma, 2018. "Driving Brand Value Through CSR Initiatives: An Empirical Study in Indian Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(1), pages 85-98, February.
    13. Ghulam Raza Sargani & Yuansheng Jiang & Abbas Ali Chandio & Yun Shen & Zhao Ding & Asif Ali, 2023. "Impacts of livelihood assets on adaptation strategies in response to climate change: evidence from Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6117-6140, July.
    14. Justina GineikienÄ—, 2013. "Consumer Nostalgia Literature Review And An Alternative Measurement Perspective," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(2).
    15. Sarker, Moniruzzaman & Mohd-Any, Amrul Asraf & Kamarulzaman, Yusniza, 2021. "Validating a consumer-based service brand equity (CBSBE) model in the airline industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Flavio Boccia & Pasquale Sarnacchiaro, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Preference: A Structural Equation Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 151-163, March.
    17. Adil Mohamed Zahran Al Kindy & Ahmad Jusoh, 2018. "Work Place Empowerment: An Assessment for the Omani Civil Service Agencies," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 202-202, December.
    18. Möhlmann, Mareike, 2021. "Unjustified trust beliefs: Trust conflation on sharing economy platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    19. Anna Lejpras & Andreas Stephan, 2011. "Locational conditions, cooperation, and innovativeness: evidence from research and company spin-offs," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(3), pages 543-575, June.
    20. Tayyba Mirza & Dr. Basharat Raza, 2023. "Does Polychronicity Impact Innovative Work Behavior? The Role of Procrastination," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(4), pages 602-609.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24002379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.