IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v187y2023ics0040162522007387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedent, behaviour, and consequence (a-b-c) of deploying the contact tracing app in response to COVID-19: Evidence from Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Dzandu, Michael D.

Abstract

In response to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, countries have or intend to deploy contact tracing apps as a way of containing and or reducing the community spread of the virus. Whilst a few studies have so far been conducted on the acceptability of the app, little is known about the antecedent, behaviour, and consequence (a-b-c) of deploying the app and its success thereof. This study, therefore, proposes and validates an integrated a-b-c and technology acceptance model of deploying the contract tracing app in four European countries. The study adopts a quantitative approach and uses publicly available cross country survey data from the Center for Open Science. An extract of 2512 data is analysed using SEM-PLS. The results confirmed the integrated a-b-c and technology acceptance model that underpins the study and revealed that the chance of achieving a positive outcome with citizens complying with recommendations of the app was only 17.1 % or R2 = 0.171 (±0.020) whilst the chance of negative consequent or deviant response of uninstallation of the app by the citizens was 54.3 % or R2 = 0.543 (±0.021). The results have huge implications for governments and public health institutions in their attempt to deploy the contract tracing app.

Suggested Citation

  • Dzandu, Michael D., 2023. "Antecedent, behaviour, and consequence (a-b-c) of deploying the contact tracing app in response to COVID-19: Evidence from Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:187:y:2023:i:c:s0040162522007387
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522007387
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Mingyung & Kim, Jeeyeon & Choi, Jeonghye & Trivedi, Minakshi, 2017. "Mobile Shopping Through Applications: Understanding Application Possession and Mobile Purchase," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 55-68.
    2. Youngkeun Choi, 2019. "Technology Acceptance Model and Stimulus-Organism Response for the Use Intention of Consumers in Social Commerce," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 15(2), pages 93-101, April.
    3. Sook Jong Lee & Hi Jeong Yu, 2013. "Factors Affecting Public Servants’ Trust in Citizens: A Case Study of South Korean Central Government Officials," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 85-114, December.
    4. Jiming Wu & Hongwei Du, 2012. "Toward a better understanding of behavioral intention and system usage constructs," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 680-698, November.
    5. Hans van der Heijden & Tibert Verhagen & Marcel Creemers, 2003. "Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 41-48, March.
    6. van Noort, Guda & van Reijmersdal, Eva A., 2019. "Branded Apps: Explaining Effects of Brands' Mobile Phone Applications on Brand Responses," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 16-26.
    7. Joanna Ejdys, 2020. "Trust-Based Determinants of Future Intention to Use Technology," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 60-68.
    8. Guido Schryen, 2013. "Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 139-169, March.
    9. Hsu, Chin-Lung & Lin, Judy Chuan-Chuan, 2016. "Effect of perceived value and social influences on mobile app stickiness and in-app purchase intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 42-53.
    10. S A Brown & A P Massey & M M Montoya-weiss & J R Burkman, 2002. "Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 283-295, September.
    11. Kai Riemer & Raffaele Ciriello & Sandra Peter & Daniel Schlagwein, 2020. "Digital contact-tracing adoption in the COVID-19 pandemic: IT governance for collective action at the societal level," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 731-745, November.
    12. Anol Bhattacherjee & Christopher J. Davis & Amy J. Connolly & Neset Hikmet & Frantz Rowe & Régis Meissonier, 2018. "User response to mandatory IT use: a coping theory perspective," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 395-414, July.
    13. Lingling Gao & Kerem Aksel Waechter, 2017. "Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 525-548, June.
    14. Necmi K. Avkiran & Christian M. Ringle (ed.), 2018. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-71691-6, December.
    15. Matthias Söllner & Axel Hoffmann & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2016. "Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 274-287, May.
    16. Taye Demissie Beshi & Ranvinderjit Kaur, 2020. "Public Trust in Local Government: Explaining the Role of Good Governance Practices," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 337-350, June.
    17. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    18. Saheb, Tahereh & Sabour, Elham & Qanbary, Fatimah & Saheb, Tayebeh, 2022. "Delineating privacy aspects of COVID tracing applications embedded with proximity measurement technologies & digital technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Kevin J. Boyle & Thomas P. Holmes & Mario F. Teisl & Brian Roe, 2001. "A Comparison of Conjoint Analysis Response Formats," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(2), pages 441-454.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lui, Ariel K.H. & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2023. "A tough pill to swallow? The lessons learned from mandatory RFID adoption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Sohn, Stefanie & Groß, Michael, 2020. "Understanding the inhibitors to consumer mobile purchasing intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Pan Gong & Ningshuang Zeng & Kunhui Ye & Markus König, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Acceptance of 4D BIM in EPC Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Gabriel JIPA, 2018. "Mobile Applications Buying Opinions Exploration using Topic Modeling," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(2), pages 44-55.
    5. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Chi-Yo Huang & Hui-Ya Wang & Chia-Lee Yang & Steven J. H. Shiau, 2020. "A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Diffusion and Adoption of an Open Source Learning Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Brusch, Ines & Rappel, Nina, 2020. "Exploring the acceptance of instant shopping – An empirical analysis of the determinants of user intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Ya-na Wang & Lifu Jin & Hanping Mao, 2019. "Farmer Cooperatives’ Intention to Adopt Agricultural Information Technology—Mediating Effects of Attitude," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 565-580, June.
    10. Isaac Kofi Mensah & Guohua Zeng & Chuanyong Luo, 2023. "Determinants of Social Commerce Purchase and Recommendation Intentions Within the Context of Swift Guanxi Among Chinese College Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    11. Alnawas, Ibrahim & Al Khateeb, Amr & El Hedhli, Kamel, 2023. "The effects of app-related factors on app stickiness: The role of cognitive and emotional app relationship quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Daria Plotkina & Landisoa Rabeson, 2022. "The role of transactionality of mobile branded apps in brand experience and its impact on loyalty," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(5), pages 470-483, September.
    13. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    14. Stroh, Tim & Mention, Anne-Laure & Duff, Cameron, 2023. "The impact of evolved psychological mechanisms on innovation and adoption: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    15. Ho, Xuan Huong & Nguyen, Dong Phong & Cheng, Julian Ming Sung & Le, Angelina Nhat Hanh, 2022. "Customer engagement in the context of retail mobile apps: A contingency model integrating spatial presence experience and its drivers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Julian Löbbers & Sebastian Lins & Theresa Kromat & Alexander Benlian & Ali Sunyaev, 2022. "A multi-perspective lens on web assurance seals: contrasting vendors’ intended and consumers’ perceived effects," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1573-1615, December.
    17. Molinillo, Sebastian & Aguilar-Illescas, Rocío & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Carvajal-Trujillo, Elena, 2022. "The customer retail app experience: Implications for customer loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Talwar, Shalini & Dhir, Amandeep & Khalil, Ashraf & Mohan, Geetha & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul, 2020. "Point of adoption and beyond. Initial trust and mobile-payment continuation intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. Andrade-Valbuena, Nelson & Torres, Juan Pablo, 2018. "Technological reflectiveness from a managerial capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 84-97.
    20. Sheshadri Chatterjee & Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee & Chia-Wen Tsai & Amit Kumar Agrawal, 2021. "Impact of peer influence and government support for successful adoption of technology for vocational education: A quantitative study using PLS-SEM technique," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2041-2064, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:187:y:2023:i:c:s0040162522007387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.