IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spomar/v20y2017i5p483-496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International cross-sector social partnerships between sport and governments: The World Anti-Doping Agency

Author

Listed:
  • Toohey, Kristine
  • Beaton, Anthony

Abstract

This article presents the results of an in-depth case study of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), a global cross-sector social partnership (CSSP) through which governments and sport collaborate to address the social issue of doping in sport. The authors specifically explore how WADA has managed two key issues (securing financial contributions and the 2007 presidential election) using institutional and resource-dependence theories to better understand the question of why and how a sport CSSP responds strategically to its environmental and resource constraints in its precursory, establishment, and continuance phases. In doing so, the authors contribute to the sport management literature by providing new theoretical insights in the context of an international CSSP whose governance model challenges traditional management theories (Selsky & Parker, 2005) and is increasingly relevant in the current era of global management of social issues (Scherer & Palazzo, 2010). Findings suggest that for global CSSPs internal and external legitimacy is imperative through securing moral and geopolitical legitimacy, and there is value in considering resource-dependence and institutional theories as complementary rather than competing frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Toohey, Kristine & Beaton, Anthony, 2017. "International cross-sector social partnerships between sport and governments: The World Anti-Doping Agency," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 483-496.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:20:y:2017:i:5:p:483-496
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2016.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144135231630095X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2016.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marvin Washington & Karen D.W. Patterson, 2011. "Hostile takeover or joint venture: Connections between institutional theory and sport management research," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Nicolas Eber, 2002. "Credibility and Independence of the World Anti-Doping Agency: A Barro-Gordon-type approach to antidoping policy," Post-Print hal-03701287, HAL.
    3. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2010. "Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor," Research Papers 2017r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. Anne Parmigiani & Miguel Rivera-Santos, 2011. "Clearing a Path Through the Forest : A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships," Post-Print hal-02313129, HAL.
    5. Ans Kolk & Willemijn Dolen & Marlene Vock, 2010. "Trickle Effects of Cross-Sector Social Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 123-137, July.
    6. Nicolas Eber, 2002. "Credibility and Independence of the World Anti-Doping Agency," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 3(1), pages 90-96, February.
    7. John Selsky & Barbara Parker, 2010. "Platforms for Cross-Sector Social Partnerships: Prospective Sensemaking Devices for Social Benefit," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 21-37, July.
    8. Rob Tulder & M. May Seitanidi & Andrew Crane & Stephen Brammer, 2016. "Enhancing the Impact of Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Dominik Rueede & Karin Kreutzer, 2015. "Legitimation Work Within a Cross-Sector Social Partnership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 39-58, April.
    10. Andrew Crane, 2010. "From governance to Governance: On Blurring Boundaries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 17-19, July.
    11. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Stefano Pascucci, 2016. "Cross-Sector Partnerships and the Co-creation of Dynamic Capabilities for Stakeholder Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 35-53, April.
    12. Matthew Murphy & Daniel Arenas & Joan Batista, 2015. "Value Creation in Cross-Sector Collaborations: The Roles of Experience and Alignment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 145-162, August.
    13. Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2013. "Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 128-152, January.
    14. Marlene Le Ber & Oana Branzei, 2010. "Value Frame Fusion in Cross Sector Interactions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 163-195, July.
    15. George B. Cunningham & Frank B. Ashley, 2001. "Isomorphism in NCAA Athletic Departments: The Use of Competing Theories and Advancement of Theory," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 47-63, January.
    16. Washington, Marvin & Patterson, Karen D.W., 2011. "Hostile takeover or joint venture: Connections between institutional theory and sport management research," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, February.
    17. Cunningham, George B. & Ashley, Frank B., 2001. "Isomorphism in NCAA Athletic Departments: The Use of Competing Theories and Advancement of Theory," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 47-63, May.
    18. Clodia Vurro & M. Dacin & Francesco Perrini, 2010. "Institutional Antecedents of Partnering for Social Change: How Institutional Logics Shape Cross-Sector Social Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 39-53, July.
    19. Spencer H. Harrison & Kevin G. Corley, 2011. "Clean Climbing, Carabiners, and Cultural Cultivation: Developing an Open-Systems Perspective of Culture," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 391-412, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed-Lutfi Al-Imam & Ahmed Al-Imam, 2017. "Knowledge and (Ab)Use in Connection with Novel Psychoactive Substances: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Psychedelic Users Existing on Online Platforms," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 1-51, November.
    2. Flavio Pinto & Yogachandran Rahulamathavan & James Skinner, 2022. "Blockchain for Doping Control Applications in Sports: A Conceptual Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne M. Quarshie & Rudolf Leuschner, 2018. "Cross-Sector Social Interactions and Systemic Change in Disaster Response: A Qualitative Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 357-384, June.
    2. Andreas Hesse & Karin Kreutzer & Marjo-Riitta Diehl, 2019. "Dynamics of Institutional Logics in a Cross-Sector Social Partnership: The Case of Refugee Integration in Germany," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 679-704, October.
    3. Christiana Weber & Helen Haugh & Markus Göbel & Hannes Leonardy, 2022. "Pathways to Lasting Cross-Sector Social Collaboration: A Configurational Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 613-639, May.
    4. Claudia Savarese & Benjamin Huybrechts & Marek Hudon, 2021. "The Influence of Interorganizational Collaboration on Logic Conciliation and Tensions Within Hybrid Organizations: Insights from Social Enterprise–Corporate Collaborations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 709-721, November.
    5. Salla Laasonen & Martin Fougère & Arno Kourula, 2012. "Dominant Articulations in Academic Business and Society Discourse on NGO–Business Relations: A Critical Assessment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(4), pages 521-545, September.
    6. Claudia Savarese & Benjamin Huybrechts & Marek Hudon, 2020. "The Influence of Interorganizational Collaboration on Logic Conciliation and Tensions Within Hybrid Organizations: Insights from Social Enterprise–Corporate Collaborations," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/311573, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Nite, Calvin, 2017. "Message framing as institutional maintenance: The National Collegiate Athletic Association’s institutional work of addressing legitimate threats," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 338-351.
    8. Juelin Yin & Dima Jamali, 2021. "Collide or Collaborate: The Interplay of Competing Logics and Institutional Work in Cross-Sector Social Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 673-694, April.
    9. Amanda Williams & Lara Anne Blasberg, 2022. "SDG Platforms as Strategic Innovation Through Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 1041-1057, November.
    10. Svensson, Per G., 2017. "Organizational hybridity: A conceptualization of how sport for development and peace organizations respond to divergent institutional demands," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 443-454.
    11. Stephan Manning & Daniel Roessler, 2014. "The Formation of Cross-Sector Development Partnerships: How Bridging Agents Shape Project Agendas and Longer-Term Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 527-547, September.
    12. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Stefano Pascucci, 2016. "Cross-Sector Partnerships and the Co-creation of Dynamic Capabilities for Stakeholder Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 35-53, April.
    13. Morgane Pennec & Emmanuel Raufflet, 2018. "Value Creation in Inter-Organizational Collaboration: An Empirical Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 817-834, April.
    14. Christiana Weber & Kathrin Weidner & Arne Kroeger & James Wallace, 2017. "Social Value Creation in Inter-Organizational Collaborations in the Not-for-Profit Sector – Give and Take from a Dyadic Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 929-956, September.
    15. Michelle Shumate & Jiawei Sophia Fu & Katherine R. Cooper, 2018. "Does Cross-Sector Collaboration Lead to Higher Nonprofit Capacity?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 385-399, June.
    16. Gowthorp, Lisa & Greenhow, Annette & O’Brien, Danny, 2016. "An interdisciplinary approach in identifying the legitimate regulator of anti-doping in sport: The case of the Australian Football League," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 48-60.
    17. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    18. Watson, Rosina & Wilson, Hugh N. & Macdonald, Emma K., 2020. "Business-nonprofit engagement in sustainability-oriented innovation: What works for whom and why?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 87-98.
    19. Naeem Ashraf & Alireza Ahmadsimab & Jonatan Pinkse, 2017. "From Animosity to Affinity: The Interplay of Competing Logics and Interdependence in Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 793-822, September.
    20. Mario La Torre & Annarita Trotta & Helen Chiappini & Alessandro Rizzello, 2019. "Business Models for Sustainable Finance: The Case Study of Social Impact Bonds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:20:y:2017:i:5:p:483-496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/716936/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.