IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spomar/v12y2009i3p193-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The practice of brand extension through licensing: The Spalding Challenge: Teaching note and overview for use in class

Author

Listed:
  • Cobbs, Joe
  • McKelvey, Stephen

Abstract

This teaching note presents instructors with several avenues for incorporating the case study, "The Practice of Brand Extension through Licensing: The Spalding Challenge," into their classrooms. By proposing classroom demonstrations and exercises based on the authors' experience as well as selected readings that correspond directly to the theoretical applications of brand equity, brand extensions and licensing strategy, and stakeholder analysis, the case note provides the foundation for achieving comprehensive learning outcomes. In addition, the note concludes by outlining what steps Spalding actually took to address the licensing dilemma presented in the case, thereby offering the instructor a finishing tool with which to illustrate the practical application of the concepts presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Cobbs, Joe & McKelvey, Stephen, 2009. "The practice of brand extension through licensing: The Spalding Challenge: Teaching note and overview for use in class," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 193-198, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:193-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441352309000473
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. " Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:193-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/716936/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.