IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v220y2019icp41-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

You're worth what you eat: Adolescent beliefs about healthy eating, morality and socioeconomic status

Author

Listed:
  • Fielding-Singh, Priya

Abstract

Amidst growing concern about adolescents' diets and dietary health in the United States, this article asks: what does healthy eating mean to adolescents? Using data from in-depth interviews conducted with 74 adolescents across socioeconomic status (SES) in California in 2015–2016, I show how adolescents view healthy eating as a moral, affluent practice and use discussions of healthy eating to assert their own morality and socioeconomic position. Adolescents associate healthy eating with 1) financial privilege and 2) moral superiority. Adolescents differ, however, in how they view their own families' healthy eating habits, and accordingly, their own moral worth. Most middle- and high-SES adolescents depict their families as healthy eaters. They trace their families' healthy diets to financial privilege while simultaneously framing these diets as morally superior. In the process, middle- and high-SES adolescents distinguish their families – as healthy eaters – from poor, “unhealthy” families. In contrast, few low-SES adolescents describe their families as healthy eaters. On the one hand, these adolescents report that financial constraints limit their families' abilities to eat healthily. But most also subscribe to the same discourses that label healthy eating as morally superior. While a minority of low-SES adolescents push back against these discourses to regain a sense of moral worth, overall, more privileged adolescents' beliefs about healthy eating enable them to assert themselves as good, moral people, while those shared beliefs challenge less privileged adolescents’ abilities to do the same. In this way, beliefs about healthy eating serve as a powerful medium for adolescents to mark and moralize socioeconomic groups, and each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Fielding-Singh, Priya, 2019. "You're worth what you eat: Adolescent beliefs about healthy eating, morality and socioeconomic status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 41-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:220:y:2019:i:c:p:41-48
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795361830618X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McPhail, Deborah & Chapman, Gwen E. & Beagan, Brenda L., 2011. ""Too much of that stuff can't be good": Canadian teens, morality, and fast food consumption," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 301-307, July.
    2. Fox, Nick & Ward, Katie J., 2008. "You are what you eat? Vegetarianism, health and identity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2585-2595, June.
    3. Stead, Martine & McDermott, Laura & MacKintosh, Anne Marie & Adamson, Ashley, 2011. "Why healthy eating is bad for young people's health: Identity, belonging and food," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1131-1139, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afshin Vafaei & Jocelyn M Stewart & Susan P Phillips, 2023. "Descriptive regression tree analysis of intersecting predictors of adult self-rated health: Does gender matter? A cross-sectional study of Canadian adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Sochas, Laura, 2019. "Women who break the rules: Social exclusion and inequities in pregnancy and childbirth experiences in Zambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 278-288.
    3. Wendy Wills & Giada Danesi & Ariadne Beatrice Kapetanaki & Laura Hamilton, 2019. "Socio-Economic Factors, the Food Environment and Lunchtime Food Purchasing by Young People at Secondary School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Jessica A Harris & Julia Carins & Sharyn Rundle-Thiele, 2021. "Can Social Cognitive Theory Influence Breakfast Frequency in an Institutional Context: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charry, Karine & Tessitore, Tina, 2021. "I tweet, they follow, you eat: Number of followers as nudge on social media to eat more healthily," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    2. Shannon, Jerry, 2014. "What does SNAP benefit usage tell us about food access in low-income neighborhoods?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 89-99.
    3. Carfora, V. & Caso, D. & Conner, M., 2017. "Correlational study and randomised controlled trial for understanding and changing red meat consumption: The role of eating identities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 244-252.
    4. Jinsoo Hwang & Heather (Markham) Kim & Jinkyung Jenny Kim, 2023. "Examining the Importance of Motivation and Its Impact on Outcome Variables in the Context of Edible Insect Restaurant," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    5. Tarabashkina, Liudmila & Quester, Pascale & Crouch, Roberta, 2016. "Exploring the moderating effect of children's nutritional knowledge on the relationship between product evaluations and food choice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-152.
    6. Bodil Just Christensen & Sidse Marie Sidenius Bestle & Ellen Trolle & Anja Pia Biltoft-Jensen & Jeppe Matthiessen & Anne Dahl Lassen, 2022. "A Qualitative Evaluation of Social Aspects of Sugar-Rich Food and Drink Intake and Parental Strategies for Reductions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Weible, Daniela & Salamon, Petra, 2018. "Youths’ Preferences for Milk Products at School: How Product Attributes and Perceived Body Image Affect Choices," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(2), March.
    8. Einhorn, Laura, 2020. "Normative social influence on meat consumption," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    9. Eimear Leahy & Seán Lyons & Richard S. J. Tol, 2011. "Determinants of Vegetarianism and Meat Consumption Frequency in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 42(4), pages 407-436.
    10. Ceuterick, Melissa & Vandebroek, Ina, 2017. "Identity in a medicine cabinet: Discursive positions of Andean migrants towards their use of herbal remedies in the United Kingdom," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 43-51.
    11. Allison Christopher & John P. Bartkowski & Timothy Haverda, 2018. "Portraits of Veganism: A Comparative Discourse Analysis of a Second-Order Subculture," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Stead, Martine & McDermott, Laura & MacKintosh, Anne Marie & Adamson, Ashley, 2011. "Why healthy eating is bad for young people's health: Identity, belonging and food," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1131-1139, April.
    13. Khanijou, Ratna & Cappellini, Benedetta & Hosany, Sameer, 2021. "Meal for two: A typology of co-performed practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 675-688.
    14. Thirlway, Frances, 2016. "Everyday tactics in local moral worlds: E-cigarette practices in a working-class area of the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 106-113.
    15. Wedow, Robbee & Briley, Daniel A. & Short, Susan E. & Boardman, Jason D., 2016. "Gender and genetic contributions to weight identity among adolescents and young adults in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 99-107.
    16. Jana Krizanova & Jorge Guardiola, 2023. "Conceptualizations of Happiness and Vegetarianism: Empirical Evidence from University Students in Spain," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1483-1503, April.
    17. Lorenzoni, Valentina & Triulzi, Isotta & Martinucci, Irene & Toncelli, Letizia & Natilli, Michela & Barale, Roberto & Turchetti, Giuseppe, 2021. "Understanding eating choices among university students: A study using data from cafeteria cashiers’ transactions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 665-673.
    18. Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Weible, Daniela & Salamon, Petra, 2016. "Preferences for School Milk - How Juveniles Differ," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244518, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    19. Andrews, Gavin J. & Duff, Cameron, 2019. "Matter beginning to matter: On posthumanist understandings of the vital emergence of health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 123-134.
    20. Jana Krizanova & Jorge Guardiola, 2021. "Happy but Vegetarian? Understanding the Relationship of Vegetarian Subjective Well-Being from the Nature-Connectedness Perspective of University Students," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(5), pages 2221-2249, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:220:y:2019:i:c:p:41-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.