IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v374y2025ics0277953625003399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of dignity in food assistance: Participant experiences with a free meal kit program

Author

Listed:
  • Brenton, Joslyn
  • Tindall, Alyssa
  • Glanz, Karen
  • Virudachalam, Senbagam

Abstract

Federal and private food assistance programs play a crucial role in addressing hunger and nutrition insecurity in the United States. However, using food assistance poses inherent challenges to the construction of food dignity given the longstanding neoliberal stigma surrounding the use of charitable food programs. A human rights approach to food shifts the emphasis from receiving enough food to promoting a food system that values and promotes dignity. Drawing on 116 in-depth interviews with 67 participants during and after their use of a free 4-week meal kit program called Pass the Love, this analysis reveals six components of a high-dignity food experience. These include: (1) unconditional access (2) providing a complete meal (3) fresh and healthy food (4) minimizing access and preparation burden (5) conveying care and generating positive emotional experiences, and (6) honoring diverse foodways and practices. This study contributes to a growing literature on food dignity and suggests that food assistance programs can better achieve their goals by fostering food dignity.

Suggested Citation

  • Brenton, Joslyn & Tindall, Alyssa & Glanz, Karen & Virudachalam, Senbagam, 2025. "The role of dignity in food assistance: Participant experiences with a free meal kit program," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:374:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625003399
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003399
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:374:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625003399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.