IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v98y2025ics0038012124003471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable planning of penal facilities through multi-objective location-allocation modelling and data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt, Atıl
  • Gumus, Mehmet

Abstract

The escalating population of inmates necessitates a substantial increase in penal facilities. Consequently, there arises a pressing need for strategic planning to identify the location and capacities of new penal facilities, along with the appropriate allocation of prisoners therein. This study proposes a solution methodology to address this imperative by considering multiple future periods and objectives. Specifically, the study examines three objective functions simultaneously based on the three dimensions of sustainability, delineated along economy, society, and environment. To operationalize this framework, a multi-objective mixed integer linear programming model is developed, and an iterative solution methodology is proposed to generate alternative solutions. The alternative solutions are created for two scenarios: exact and fractional assignment of prisons in cities. Subsequently, the efficacy of these alternatives is assessed through the application of super-efficiency and cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis techniques. In each of these scenarios, the most efficient solution among alternatives is identified as the final solution. The empirical data utilized in the study is sourced from real-world cases in Turkey. Comparative analyses of the solutions under each scenario offer valuable insights into their respective advantages and disadvantages, thereby contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt, Atıl & Gumus, Mehmet, 2025. "Sustainable planning of penal facilities through multi-objective location-allocation modelling and data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012124003471
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.102147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124003471
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    2. Baskoro, Firly Rachmaditya & Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Morikawa, Katsumi & Nagasawa, Keisuke, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization on total cost and carbon dioxide emission of coal supply for coal-fired power plants in Indonesia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. R Korporaal & A Ridder & P Kloprogge & R Dekker, 2000. "An analytic model for capacity planning of prisons in the Netherlands," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(11), pages 1228-1237, November.
    4. Levent Eriskin & Mumtaz Karatas & Yu-Jun Zheng, 2024. "A robust multi-objective model for healthcare resource management and location planning during pandemics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1471-1518, April.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. Amir Hossein Nobil & Sajjad Jalali & Seyed Taghi Akhavan Niaki, 2018. "Financially embedded facility location decisions on designing a supply chain structure: A case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(6), pages 520-533, November.
    7. Correia, Isabel & Melo, Teresa, 2016. "Multi-period capacitated facility location under delayed demand satisfaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 729-746.
    8. Karatas, Mumtaz, 2021. "A dynamic multi-objective location-allocation model for search and rescue assets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 620-633.
    9. Esra Karasakal & Utkan Eryılmaz & Orhan Karasakal, 2022. "Ranking using PROMETHEE when weights and thresholds are imprecise: a data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(9), pages 1978-1995, October.
    10. Wang, Yunqi & Wang, Hao & Razzaghi, Reza & Jalili, Mahdi & Liebman, Ariel, 2024. "Multi-objective coordinated EV charging strategy in distribution networks using an improved augmented epsilon-constrained method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    11. Derya Celik Turkoglu & Mujde Erol Genevois, 2020. "A comparative survey of service facility location problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 399-468, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azarnoosh Kafi & Behrouz Daneshian & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2021. "Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 41-59.
    2. Büschken, Joachim, 2009. "When does data envelopment analysis outperform a naïve efficiency measurement model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 647-657, January.
    3. Helmi Hammami & Thanh Ngo & David Tripe & Dinh-Tri Vo, 2022. "Ranking with a Euclidean common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: with application to the Eurozone banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 675-694, April.
    4. Adler, Nicole & Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2002. "Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 249-265, July.
    5. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. da Silva, Aneirson Francisco & Miranda, Rafael de Carvalho & Marins, Fernando Augusto Silva & Dias, Erica Ximenes, 2024. "A new multiple criteria data envelopment analysis with variable return to scale: Applying bi-dimensional representation and super-efficiency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 308-322.
    7. Mohammad Tavassoli & Mahsa Ghandehari & Masoud Taherinia, 2023. "Rang-adjusted measure: modelling and computational aspects from internal and external perspectives for network DEA," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1-34, December.
    8. Seyed Rakhshan & Ali Kamyad & Sohrab Effati, 2015. "Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 505-525, March.
    9. Alireza Amirteimoori & Sohrab Kordrostami, 2012. "A distance-based measure of super efficiency in data envelopment analysis: an application to gas companies," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 117-128, September.
    10. Panagiotis Ravanos & Giannis Karagiannis, 2023. "Correction: A VEA Benefit-of-the-Doubt Model for the HDI," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 793-796, November.
    11. Ruijing Zheng & Yu Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Wei Chen & Xiaodong Chen & Yaping Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Drivers of Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Haugland, Sven A. & Myrtveit, Ingunn & Nygaard, Arne, 2007. "Market orientation and performance in the service industry: A data envelopment analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 1191-1197, November.
    14. Martin Eling, 2006. "Performance measurement of hedge funds using data envelopment analysis," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 20(4), pages 442-471, December.
    15. Ruiz, Jose L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2001. "Techniques for the assessment of influence in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 390-399, July.
    16. Roberto Cervelló Royo & Fernando García García & Francisco Guijarro-Martínez & Ismael Moya-Clemente, 2011. "Housing Ranking: a model of equilibrium between buyers and sellers expectations," ERSA conference papers ersa11p314, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Artur Wyszyński, 2017. "Sytuacja finansowa klubów Ekstraklasy w ujęciu metody DEA," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 69-99.
    18. Alexandre Marinho & Simone de Souza Cardoso & Vivian Vicente de Almeida, 2009. "Avaliação da Eficiência Técnica dos Países nos Jogos Olímpicos de Pequim – 2008," Discussion Papers 1394, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    19. Ülengin, Füsun & Kabak, Özgür & Önsel, Sule & Aktas, Emel & Parker, Barnett R., 2011. "The competitiveness of nations and implications for human development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 16-27, March.
    20. Hosein Arman & Abdollah Hadi‐Vencheh, 2021. "Restricting the relative weights in data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4127-4136, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012124003471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.