IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v98y2025ics0038012124003410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A smart and agile dry port-seaport logistic network considering industry 5.0: A multi-stage data-driven approach

Author

Listed:
  • Rekabi, Shabnam
  • Sazvar, Zeinab

Abstract

The advent of Industry 5.0 (I5.0) has precipitated a demand for sophisticated technological solutions across diverse sectors, with a particular emphasis on logistics. Dry Port-Seaports (DPSs), playing a pivotal role in facilitating international trade, are poised to derive substantial advantages from this revolution, while limited attention has been dedicated to this subject matter. This work is among the first studies that present a multi-stage, multi-objective scenario-based programming model to design a logistics network of DPSs, considering a combination of an Internet of Things (IoT) based infrastructure and I5.0 principles. Several real-world characteristics, including tardiness, staff fatigue, Multi-Modal Transportation (MMT), interrupted capacity, and export/import forecasting, are integrated into the proposed model, as well. For this purpose, the potential locations of Dry Ports (DPs) are evaluated based on I5.0 dimensions by applying the Stochastic Best Worst Method (SBWM). Subsequently, the selected DPs are assessed regarding the deployment of Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure. Eventually, a mathematical model is developed to design the DPS Logistic Network (LN) optimally. To tackle the developed mathematical model, an effective solving approach, called the Stochastic Fuzzy Meta Goal Programming (SFMGP) procedure, is introduced. Among the various time-series prediction models examined, the Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model, characterized by a lower Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), is chosen to forecast demand, as well. In order to ascertain the efficacy of the proposed framework, a real case study from commercial ports of southern Iran has been undertaken. The obtained results illustrate that the deployment IoT-based systems has significant impacts on the prevention and management of disruptions; however it may necessitate a high initial investment outlay. Moreover, the integration of IoT technology within logistics networks offers avenues for optimizing efficiency, transparency, and decision-making procedures. To illustrate, the tardiness rate is reduced by 68 % and transparency is heightened by 71 % based on the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Rekabi, Shabnam & Sazvar, Zeinab, 2025. "A smart and agile dry port-seaport logistic network considering industry 5.0: A multi-stage data-driven approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012124003410
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.102141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124003410
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gonzalez-Aregall, Marta & Bergqvist, Rickard, 2019. "The role of dry ports in solving seaport disruptions: A Swedish case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Rodriguez Uria, M. Victoria & Caballero, Rafael & Ruiz, Francisco & Romero, Carlos, 2002. "Meta-goal programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 422-429, January.
    3. Tahereh Mohammadi & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi & Seyed Esmaeil Najafi & Mohammadreza Taghizadeh-Yazdi, 2024. "Multi Objective and Multi-Product Perishable Supply Chain with Vendor-Managed Inventory and IoT-Related Technologies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Fatemeh Sabouhi & Mohammad Saeed Jabalameli & Armin Jabbarzadeh & Behnam Fahimnia, 2020. "A multi-cut L-shaped method for resilient and responsive supply chain network design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7353-7381, December.
    5. Romero, Carlos, 2004. "A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 675-686, March.
    6. Amir Jamali & Amirhossein Ranjbar & Jafar Heydari & Sina Nayeri, 2022. "A multi-objective stochastic programming model to configure a sustainable humanitarian logistics considering deprivation cost and patient severity," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1265-1300, December.
    7. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2019. "A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-39.
    8. Huang, Kerry & Wang, Kedi & Lee, Peter K.C. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2023. "The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain capability and supply chain resilience: A dynamic resource-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Manoj Kumar Tiwari & Bopaya Bidanda & Joseph Geunes & Kiran Fernandes & Alexandre Dolgui, 2024. "Supply chain digitisation and management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(8), pages 2918-2926, April.
    10. Nayeri, Sina & Sazvar, Zeinab & Heydari, Jafar, 2022. "A global-responsive supply chain considering sustainability and resiliency: Application in the medical devices industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    11. Ahmet Yunus Cil & Dini Abdurahman & Ibrahim Cil, 2022. "Internet of Things enabled real time cold chain monitoring in a container port," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    13. Xuejun Feng & Yan Zhang & Yuwei Li & Wei Wang, 2013. "A Location-Allocation Model for Seaport-Dry Port System Optimization," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Dylan & Jimenez, Mariano, 2013. "Incorporating additional meta-objectives into the extended lexicographic goal programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 343-349.
    2. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Hocine, Amine, 2018. "Meta goal programing approach for solving multi-criteria de Novo programing problemAuthor-Name: Zhuang, Zheng-Yun," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 228-238.
    4. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2011. "Multi-choice goal programming with utility functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 439-445, December.
    5. Hocine, Amin & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Li, Der-Chiang, 2020. "Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 642-654.
    6. Naeem Mohseny-Tonekabony & Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Emran Mohammadi & Mehrdad Tamiz & Dylan F. Jones, 2025. "Robust, extended goal programming with uncertainty sets: an application to a multi-objective portfolio selection problem leveraging DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 1497-1552, March.
    7. Mardani Najafabadi, Mostafa & Magazzino, Cosimo & Valente, Donatella & Mirzaei, Abbas & Petrosillo, Irene, 2023. "A new interval meta-goal programming for sustainable planning of agricultural water-land use nexus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    8. Van Nguyen, Truong & Zhang, Jie & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & He, Yong, 2020. "A data-driven optimization of large-scale dry port location using the hybrid approach of data mining and complex network theory," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Hocine, Amin & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Lozza, Sergio Ortobelli & Aouam, Tarik, 2024. "Modelling De novo programming within Simon’s satisficing theory: Methods and application in designing an optimal offshore wind farm location system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 289-306.
    10. Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Chung, Cheng-Kung, 2024. "Dissecting the visiting willingness of driving visitors facing a retail market's dual-pricing policy for parking," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Jones, Dylan & Florentino, Helenice & Cantane, Daniela & Oliveira, Rogerio, 2016. "An extended goal programming methodology for analysis of a network encompassing multiple objectives and stakeholders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 845-855.
    12. Jones, D.F. & Treloar, R. & Ouelhadj, D. & Glampedakis, A. & Bartmeyer, P., 2024. "Incorporation of poverty principles into goal programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Coshall, John T. & Charlesworth, Richard, 2011. "A management orientated approach to combination forecasting of tourism demand," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 759-769.
    14. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    15. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Halil Ibrahim Cicekdagi & Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Mehmet Cabir Akkoyunlu, 2023. "Enhancing search and rescue team performance: investigating factors behind social loafing," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(3), pages 1315-1340, December.
    17. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Feng, Jianghong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Guangyi & Xu, Gangyan & Ning, Yu, 2024. "An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    19. Ahmad Ali Atieh & Alhareth Abu Hussein & Saheer Al-Jaghoub & Ahmad Fathi Alheet & Murad Attiany, 2025. "The Impact of Digital Technology, Automation, and Data Integration on Supply Chain Performance: Exploring the Moderating Role of Digital Transformation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Chia-Nan Wang & Yu-Chi Chung & Fajar Dwi Wibowo & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen, 2023. "Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery Solution Evaluation in the Context of a Developing Country: A Novel OPA–Fuzzy MARCOS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012124003410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.