IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v82y2022ipas0038012122000052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public-private partnerships: A dynamic discrete choice model for road projects

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Jianfeng
  • Liu, Henry J.
  • Love, Peter E.D.
  • Greenwood, David J.
  • Sing, Michael C.P.

Abstract

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are an effective vehicle for delivering critical infrastructure worldwide, particularly road transport assets (e.g., bridges, toll roads and tunnels). However, PPPs have been and continue to be controversial forms of project delivery as there are concerns about their ability to provide taxpayers with value for money (VfM). Current practice to determine VfM focuses on a ‘simplistic’ ex-ante evaluation referred to as the Public Sector Comparator (PSC), aiming to take a life-cycle approach to cost and benefits assessment. However, the complexity of transport projects renders the PSC ineffective and static evaluation of cost and benefits across their life-cycle. Therefore, the PSC cannot accommodate a project's environment's dynamic and changing nature. Acknowledging the limitations of the PSC, we develop and examine a dynamic discrete choice model that can be used to provide a VfM assessment for ‘road projects’. By validating the proposed model using two illustrative cases, the results suggest it can capture a more comprehensive assessment of cost components, functionality, and benefits specific to road projects and quantify the relationship between the consideration of different assessment elements and choice utility. Therefore, utilising the new model to assess VfM can enable policymakers to make more informed decisions about the employment of PPPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Jianfeng & Liu, Henry J. & Love, Peter E.D. & Greenwood, David J. & Sing, Michael C.P., 2022. "Public-private partnerships: A dynamic discrete choice model for road projects," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:82:y:2022:i:pa:s0038012122000052
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012122000052
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sounman Hong, 2016. "When does a public–private partnership (PPP) lead to inefficient cost management? Evidence from South Korea’s urban rail system," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 447-454, September.
    2. Chang, Zheng, 2014. "Financing new metros—The Beijing metro financing sustainability study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 148-155.
    3. Rouhani, Omid M. & Geddes, R. Richard & Gao, H. Oliver & Bel, Germà, 2016. "Social welfare analysis of investment public–private partnership approaches for transportation projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 86-103.
    4. Michael Opara, 2018. "Value for Money and Risk Relationships in Public–Private Partnerships: Evaluating Program‐based Evidence," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 391-404, September.
    5. Miller, Robert A, 1984. "Job Matching and Occupational Choice," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 92(6), pages 1086-1120, December.
    6. Macário, Rosário & Ribeiro, Joana & Costa, Joana Duarte, 2015. "Understanding pitfalls in the application of PPPs in transport infrastructure in Portugal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 90-99.
    7. Cinzia Cirillo & Renting Xu, 2011. "Dynamic Discrete Choice Models for Transportation," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 473-494.
    8. Oleg Melnikov, 2013. "Demand For Differentiated Durable Products: The Case Of The U.S. Computer Printer Market," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(2), pages 1277-1298, April.
    9. Penyalver, Domingo & Turró, Mateu & Williamson, John B., 2019. "Measuring the value for money of transport infrastructure procurement; an intergenerational approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 238-254.
    10. Samuel Carpintero & Ole Helby Petersen, 2014. "PPP projects in transport: evidence from light rail projects in Spain," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 43-50, January.
    11. Engel, Eduardo & Fischer, Ronald & Galetovic, Alexander, 2018. "The joy of flying: Efficient airport PPP contracts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 131-146.
    12. N. Carbonara & N. Costantino & L. Gunnigan & R. Pellegrino, 2015. "Risk Management in Motorway PPP Projects: Empirical-based Guidelines," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 162-182, March.
    13. Mouwen, Arnoud, 2015. "Drivers of customer satisfaction with public transport services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-20.
    14. de Jong, Martin & Mu, Rui & Stead, Dominic & Ma, Yongchi & Xi, Bao, 2010. "Introducing public–private partnerships for metropolitan subways in China: what is the evidence?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-313.
    15. Chang, Zheng, 2013. "Public–private partnerships in China: A case of the Beijing No.4 Metro line," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 153-160.
    16. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Yang, Zhongzhen & Zheng, Pengjun, 2021. "Latest challenges to ports in public-private partnership: Case of Dandong Port (China)'s bankruptcy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 293-305.
    17. Kweun, Jeong Yun & Wheeler, Porter K. & Gifford, Jonathan L., 2018. "Evaluating highway public-private partnerships: Evidence from U.S. value for money studies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 12-20.
    18. Jingfeng Yuan & Wenying Ji & Jiyue Guo & Mirosław J. Skibniewski, 2019. "Simulation-based dynamic adjustments of prices and subsidies for transportation PPP projects based on stakeholders’ satisfaction," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2309-2345, December.
    19. Feng, Zhuo & Zhang, Yiwen & Zhang, Shuibo & Song, Jinbo, 2018. "Contracting and renegotiating with a loss-averse private firm in BOT road projects," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 40-72.
    20. Liu, Yan & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2018. "A generalized dynamic discrete choice model for green vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 288-302.
    21. Qin, Huanmei & Gao, Jianqiang & Wu, Yao-Jan & Yan, Hai, 2019. "Analysis on context change and repetitive travel mode choices based on a dynamic, computational model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 155-164.
    22. Darrin Grimsey & Mervyn K. Lewis, 2005. "Are Public Private Partnerships value for money?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 345-378, December.
    23. Anthony Wall & Ciaran Connolly, 2009. "The Private Finance Initiative," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(5), pages 707-724, September.
    24. Matti Siemiatycki & Naeem Farooqi, 2012. "Value for Money and Risk in Public–Private Partnerships," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(3), pages 286-299.
    25. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid, 2018. "Hypothetical bias and decision-rule effect in modelling discrete directional choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 361-388.
    26. Jane Andrew & Damien Cahill, 2009. "Value for Money? Neo-Liberalism in New South Wales Prisons," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(2), pages 144-152, June.
    27. Heather Whiteside, 2020. "Public-private partnerships: market development through management reform," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 880-902, July.
    28. Love, Peter E.D. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic & Welde, Morten & Odeck, James, 2017. "Light rail transit cost performance: Opportunities for future-proofing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 27-39.
    29. Chang, Zheng & Phang, Sock-Yong, 2017. "Urban rail transit PPPs: Lessons from East Asian cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 106-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cao, Fuguo & Li, Runyu & Guo, Shaobo, 2024. "Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Jiang, Ke & Zhang, Jiaming & Zhang, Leilei & Wang, Die & Wang, Yusheng, 2023. "Sustainable cooperation in the watershed ecological compensation public-private partnership project: Lessons from China's Chishui river basin," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Jianfeng & Greenwood, David & Thurairajah, Niraj & Liu, Henry J. & Haigh, Richard, 2022. "Value for money in transport infrastructure investment: An enhanced model for better procurement decisions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 68-78.
    2. Chang, Zheng & Phang, Sock-Yong, 2017. "Urban rail transit PPPs: Lessons from East Asian cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 106-122.
    3. Shahin Shakibaei & Pelin Alpkokin, 2019. "Conflict Resolution in Competitive Liberalized Railway Market: Application of Game Theoretic Concepts," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(01), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Rambha, Tarun & Nozick, Linda K. & Davidson, Rachel, 2021. "Modeling hurricane evacuation behavior using a dynamic discrete choice framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 75-100.
    5. Daniel, Albalate & Germà, Bel & Albert, Gragera, 2019. "Politics, risk, and white elephants in infrastructure PPPs," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 158-165.
    6. Avner Offer, 2018. "Patient and impatient capital: time horizons as market boundaries," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _165, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    7. Liu, Yan & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2018. "A generalized dynamic discrete choice model for green vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 288-302.
    8. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon A. & Matthews, Jane & Li, Xinjian & Fang, Weili, 2021. "A procurement policy-making pathway to future-proof large-scale transport infrastructure assets," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Dónal Palcic & Eoin Reeves & Anne Stafford, 2018. "Lifting the Lid: the Private Financing of Motorway PPPs in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 217-239.
    10. Cian O'SHEA & Dónal PALCIC & Eoin REEVES, 2019. "Comparing Ppp With Traditional Procurement: The Case Of Schools Procurement In Ireland," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 245-267, June.
    11. Deborah de Lange, 2023. "Sustainable Transportation for the Climate: How Do Transportation Firms Engage in Cooperative Public-Private Partnerships?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Rosella Carè & Riccardo De Lisa, 2019. "Social Impact Bonds for a Sustainable Welfare State: The Role of Enabling Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Jean-Pierre Dubé & Günter Hitsch & Pranav Jindal, 2014. "The Joint identification of utility and discount functions from stated choice data: An application to durable goods adoption," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 331-377, December.
    14. Zhao, Yunpeng & Song, Jinbo & Feng, Zhuo & Jin, Lulu, 2023. "Incentive contracts with demand guarantee in BOT toll road projects," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Thekiso MOLOKWANE & Alex NDUHURA & Lukamba Muhiya-TSHOMBE & Innocent NUWAGABA, 2020. "The role of PPPs in creating sustainable cities," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 8, pages 283-302, November.
    16. Chang, Zheng, 2014. "Financing new metros—The Beijing metro financing sustainability study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 148-155.
    17. Salman Ahmad & Shahnawaz Khan & Shah Wali Khan, 2016. "Developing Infrastructure through Public Private Partnerships; Understanding the Elements of the Enabling Environment," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 8(1), pages 19-34, April.
    18. Mochon, Pablo & Mochon, Asuncion & Saez, Yago, 2022. "Combinatorial versus sequential auctions to allocate PPP highway projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 23-39.
    19. Shi, Shasha & Yin, Yafeng & An, Qingxian & Chen, Ke, 2021. "Optimal build-operate-transfer road contracts under information asymmetry and uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 65-86.
    20. Urena Serulle, Nayel & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2017. "The optimal time to evacuate: A behavioral dynamic model on Louisiana resident data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 447-463.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:82:y:2022:i:pa:s0038012122000052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.