IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v88y2023icp258-279.html

A non-parametric synthesize measure for corporate governance: empirical evidence from Indian banks

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, Rohit Kumar
  • Sharma, Supran Kumar

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to craft a corporate governance index for Indian banks by eliminating the subjectivity in assigning weights. The present framework includes six corporate governance dimensions, which include the attributes related to the board committee, audit committee, risk management committee, remuneration committee and transparency of the banks. The study considers measuring the index value for corporate governance framework via a novel extension of the classical data envelopment analysis technique known as the benefit of doubt analysis, as this approach assigns the weights objectively to the different dimensions of corporate governance and thereafter provides a synthesised score to be termed as the corporate governance index. Further, the present study attempts to know any variation in the index score when the whole sample is divided into sub-sample for two different groups in terms of duality and non-duality of CEO leadership board and other is based on the large and small size of banks. The analysis reveals that non-duality boards and small-size banks are more adaptable to the governacne norms. The analysis further documented that in an emerging economy effective implementation of governance norms is not only beneficial in protecting the interest of the shareholders but also contributes to the business performance. Thus, based on the novel analysis the study provides few policy implications in terms of identifying the key areas for an effective corporate governance framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, Rohit Kumar & Sharma, Supran Kumar, 2023. "A non-parametric synthesize measure for corporate governance: empirical evidence from Indian banks," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-279.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:258-279
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023001880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duru, Augustine & Iyengar, Raghavan J. & Zampelli, Ernest M., 2016. "The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4269-4277.
    2. Laurens Cherchye & Wim Moesen & Tom Van Puyenbroeck, 2004. "Legitimately Diverse, yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 919-955, December.
    3. Abraham, Santhosh & Shrives, Philip J., 2014. "Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 91-107.
    4. Anand, Anita & Milne, Frank & Purda, Lynnette, 2006. "Voluntary Adoption Of Corporate Governance Mechanisms," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273588, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    5. Brickley, James A. & Zimmerman, Jerold L., 2010. "Corporate governance myths: Comments on Armstrong, Guay, and Weber," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 235-245, December.
    6. Haroon ur Rashid Khan & Waqas Bin Khidmat & Osama Al Hares & Naeem Muhammad & Kashif Saleem, 2020. "Corporate Governance Quality, Ownership Structure, Agency Costs and Firm Performance. Evidence from an Emerging Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-35, July.
    7. Tulung, Joy Elly & Ramdani, Dendi, 2017. "Independence, Size and Performance of the Board an emerging market research," MPRA Paper 112180, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 12 Jan 2018.
    8. Cristina Bernini & Andrea Guizzardi & Giovanni Angelini, 2013. "DEA-Like Model and Common Weights Approach for the Construction of a Subjective Community Well-Being Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 405-424, November.
    9. Art Durnev & E. Han Kim, 2005. "To Steal or Not to Steal: Firm Attributes, Legal Environment, and Valuation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 60(3), pages 1461-1493, June.
    10. Sahoo, Biresh K. & Singh, Ramadhar & Mishra, Bineet & Sankaran, Krithiga, 2017. "Research productivity in management schools of India during 1968-2015: A directional benefit-of-doubt model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 118-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Wei & Zhao, Xinyi & Ding, Quan & Huang, Mai & Shi, Baofeng, 2026. "Evaluation system for the governance capability of national oil companies: A perspective on litigation and business punishment status," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Puyenbroeck, Tom & Rogge, Nicky, 2017. "Geometric mean quantity index numbers with Benefit-of-the-Doubt weights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 1004-1014.
    2. Barbara, Petracci, 2011. "Trading when you cannot trade: Blackout periods in Italian firms," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 196-204, September.
    3. Maria Aluchna & Tomasz Kuszewski, 2020. "Does Corporate Governance Compliance Increase Company Value? Evidence from the Best Practice of the Board," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Fusco, Elisa & Vidoli, Francesco & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2018. "Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Tang, Pengcheng & Yang, Shuxiang & Yang, Shuwang, 2020. "How to design corporate governance structures to enhance corporate social responsibility in China's mining state-owned enterprises?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Durnev, Art & Fauver, Larry, 2008. "Stealing from Thieves: Firm Governance and Performance when States are Predatory," CEI Working Paper Series 2008-12, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    7. Gulati, Rachita & Charles, Vincent & Kumar, Sunil, 2024. "School education development index: A meta-frontier range directional measure benefit-of-the-doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Francisco Javier Blancas & Ignacio Contreras, 2025. "Global SDG composite indicator: A new methodological proposal that combines compensatory and non‐compensatory aggregations," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 158-176, February.
    9. Anita I. Anand & Edward M. Iacobucci, 2011. "An Empirical Examination of the Governance Choices of Income Trusts," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 147-176, March.
    10. Juan Aparicio & Magdalena Kapelko, 2019. "Enhancing the Measurement of Composite Indicators of Corporate Social Performance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 807-826, July.
    11. Varun Bhandari & Ashima Arora, 2016. "Influence of Shareholders’ Activism and Firm-level Variables on the Corporate Governance Quality in India," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 9(2), pages 122-147, December.
    12. Emmanuel Mensah & Christopher Boachie, 2023. "Analysis of the determinants of corporate governance quality: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 431-450, December.
    13. Mohit Pathak & Arti Chandani, 2023. "Board composition, executive compensation, and financial performance: panel evidence from India," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 359-373, December.
    14. Juan Aparicio & Magdalena Kapelko & Juan F. Monge, 2020. "A Well-Defined Composite Indicator: An Application to Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 299-323, July.
    15. Denis Cormier & Pascale Lapointe-Antunes & Michel Magnan, 2015. "Does corporate governance enhance the appreciation of mandatory environmental disclosure by financial markets?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(4), pages 897-925, November.
    16. Veerma Puri, 2023. "Corporate governance characteristics, financial characteristics and HR practices disclosures: an Indian scenario," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 231-247, September.
    17. Chiu-Hui Wu, 2021. "On the Moderating Effects of Country Governance on the Relationships between Corporate Governance and Firm Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Min, Byung-Seong, 2013. "Evaluation of board reforms: An examination of the appointment of outside directors," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 21-43.
    19. Jehad S. Aldehayyat & Sliman S. Alsoboa & Mohammad H. Al-Kilani, 2017. "Investigating How Corporate Governance Affects Performance of Firm in Small Emerging Markets: An Empirical Analysis for Jordanian Manufacturing Firms," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 77-95, January.
    20. Ghosh, Chinmoy & He, Fan & Zhou, Haoyong, 2021. "On the role of foreign directors: Evidence from cross-listed firms," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 177-202.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:258-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.