IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v102y2025ics1059056025004587.html

“Minor offenses with heavy penalties “or” equivalent penalties ":Whether the business environment construction can support the breakthrough and innovation of enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Bi, Mingxiong
  • Jiang, Xiaofen
  • Dai, Ruoyu

Abstract

A well-functioning business environment can promote innovation activities. In recent years, many studies have examined the relationship between the business environment and innovation, but the focus has largely been on the market economy, neglecting the impact of the rule of law business environment. Unstable regulatory enforcement by public personnel can affect enterprises' external environment assessments and decision-making. Therefore, using data from Chinese listed companies and provinces from 2008 to 2022, this study employs a two-way fixed effects model for empirical analysis to explore the impact of the rule of law business environment on enterprises' radical innovation, drawing the following conclusions. When administrative personnel strictly enforce laws, minor offenses with heavy penalties can degrade the local business environment and have a negative impact on enterprises’ radical innovation, and rent-seeking has a mediating role. The suggestions we propose are that law enforcement personnel should standardize regulatory enforcement, adhere to a combination of punishment and education, and strengthen the awareness of equivalent penalties. Furthermore, laws and regulations related to rent-seeking should be developed and refined to reduce legal gaps and enterprises should be educated more effectively. Enterprises should also set long term goals, enhance their risk-bearing capacity, maintain a sense of social responsibility, and promote innovative development.

Suggested Citation

  • Bi, Mingxiong & Jiang, Xiaofen & Dai, Ruoyu, 2025. "“Minor offenses with heavy penalties “or” equivalent penalties ":Whether the business environment construction can support the breakthrough and innovation of enterprises," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025004587
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025004587
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diego Restuccia & Richard Rogerson, 2008. "Policy Distortions and Aggregate Productivity with Heterogeneous Plants," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 11(4), pages 707-720, October.
    2. Athanasouli, Daphne & Goujard, Antoine, 2015. "Corruption and management practices: Firm level evidence," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 1014-1034.
    3. Baumol, William J., 1996. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 3-22, January.
    4. Li, Yunhe & Tina Zhang, Xiaotian, 2023. "Rent-seeking in bank credit and firm R&D innovation: The role of industrial agglomeration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Huan & Guo, Yilin & Li, Yu, 2025. "Cross-border e-commerce business environment evaluation for Chinese provinces using a combined Entropy-TOPSIS approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burak Uras, 2012. "Entrepreneurship and Technology Choice with Limited Contract Enforcement," 2012 Meeting Papers 599, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    2. Ufuk Akcigit & Salomé Baslandze & Francesca Lotti, 2023. "Connecting to Power: Political Connections, Innovation, and Firm Dynamics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(2), pages 529-564, March.
    3. Fernando del Río, 2019. "Property Rights, Predation, and Productivity," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(3), pages 1154-1188, July.
    4. Kong, Qunxi & Tong, Xin & Peng, Dan & Wong, Zoey & Chen, Huy, 2021. "How factor market distortions affect OFDI: An explanation based on investment propensity and productivity effects," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 459-472.
    5. Yuyuan Wen & Fangfang Li & Zhiqing Wang, 2025. "Land Resource Allocation and Green Economic Development: Threshold Effect on Local Government Functional Performance in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Fang Wang & Xiaoyong Dai, 2020. "Regulation and product innovation: the intermediate role of resource reallocation," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Keun Lee (ed.), Innovation, Catch-up and Sustainable Development, pages 153-181, Springer.
    7. Baslandze, Salomé, 2021. "Barriers to Creative Destruction: Large Firms and Non-Productive Strategies," CEPR Discussion Papers 16570, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    8. Bas, M. & Paunov, C., 2014. "The unequal effect of India's industrial liberalization on firms' decision to innovate: Do business conditions matter?," MERIT Working Papers 2014-044, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Julien Hanoteau & Virginie Vial, 2014. "Grease or sand the wheel? The effects of individual bribe payments on aggregate productivity growth," EcoMod2014 6685, EcoMod.
    10. Francisco Queiró, 2018. "Entrepreneurial Human Capital and Firm Dynamics," GEE Papers 00116, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Dec 2018.
    11. Uras, Burak R., 2016. "Long-Term Investment And Net-Worth Building With Limited Contract Enforcement," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 276-312, January.
    12. Francisco Queiró, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Human Capital and Firm Dynamics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(4), pages 2061-2100.
    13. Yao, Yao, 2019. "Does higher education expansion enhance productivity?," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 169-194.
    14. Katsuya Takii, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Efficiency: Theory," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 196-214, June.
    15. Marceau, Nicolas & Mongrain, Steeve, 2011. "Competition in law enforcement and capital allocation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 136-147, January.
    16. Simeon D. Alder, 2016. "In the Wrong Hands: Complementarities, Resource Allocation, and TFP," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 199-241, January.
    17. Sylvain Catherine & Thomas Chaney & Zongbo Huang & David Sraer & David Thesmar, 2022. "Quantifying Reduced‐Form Evidence on Collateral Constraints," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(4), pages 2143-2181, August.
    18. Francesco Trebbi & Miao Ben Zhang, 2022. "The Cost of Regulatory Compliance in the United States," NBER Working Papers 30691, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Michael Adusei, 2016. "Does Entrepreneurship Promote Economic Growth in Africa?," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 28(2), pages 201-214, June.
    20. Henrekson, Magnus & Johansson, Dan, 2010. "Firm Growth, Institutions and Structural Transformation," Ratio Working Papers 150, The Ratio Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025004587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.