IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v21y2007i1p95-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chapter 4 The Competitive Advantage in the Greek Shipping Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lagoudis, Ioannis N.
  • Theotokas, Ioannis

Abstract

In this chapter, authors intend to further existing literature by examining the importance of four factors on the competitive strategies of Greek shipping companies, namely cost, quality standards, service level and time. The analysis is based on the Johansson, McHugh, Pendlebury, and Wheeler (1993) model, where the combination of quality, service, cost and time are considered to determine the value a company creates regardless of the industry it operates in. A survey was conducted on a sample of Greek shipping companies in order to examine and evaluate the importance of Johansson et al.'s key metrics to the shipping industry. The results of this survey corroborate the results of similar surveys in international literature revealing the importance of cost for the success of shipping companies. They also validate findings in supply chain management literature where quality and time are considered as "qualifiers" and cost and service as "winner" criteria. Nevertheless, differences exist when filtering takes place in terms of company size, operating sector strategies (i.e. operating in a single or more than one sector) and dominant philosophy related to the application of supply chain strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lagoudis, Ioannis N. & Theotokas, Ioannis, 2007. "Chapter 4 The Competitive Advantage in the Greek Shipping Industry," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 95-120, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:95-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739-8859(07)21004-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Photis M. Panayides & Kevin P. B. Cullinane, 2002. "The vertical disintegration of ship management: choice criteria for third party selection and evaluation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 45-64, January.
    2. Photis M. Panayides, 2003. "Competitive strategies and organizational performance in ship management," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 123-140, January.
    3. Mason-Jones, Rachel & Towill, Denis R., 1999. "Total cycle time compression and the agile supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 61-73, May.
    4. I. N. Lagoudis & C. S. Lalwani & M.M. Naim, 2006. "Ranking of factors contributing to higher performance in the ocean transportation industry: a multi-attribute utility theory approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 345-369, September.
    5. Ben Naylor, J. & Naim, Mohamed M & Berry, Danny, 1999. "Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 107-118, May.
    6. Murphy, Paul R. & Daley, James M. & Hall, Patricia K., 1997. "Carrier selection: Do shippers and carriers agree, or not?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 67-72, March.
    7. Gelina Harlaftis & John Theotokas, 2004. "European Family Firms in International Business: British and Greek Tramp-Shipping Firms," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 219-255.
    8. Thanopoulou, Helen A, 0. "What price the flag? The terms of competitiveness in shipping," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4-5), pages 359-374, July.
    9. Kyriaki Mitroussi, 2004. "The ship owners’ stance on third party ship management: an empirical study," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 31-45, January.
    10. Holweg, Matthias & Disney, Stephen & Holmström, Jan & Småros, Johanna, 2005. "Supply Chain Collaboration:: Making Sense of the Strategy Continuum," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 170-181, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna, Merika & Anna, Triantafyllou & George, Zombanakis, 2019. "Wage and tax competitiveness: The case of Hellenic shipping," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 255-270.
    2. Yuen, Kum Fai & Thai, Vinh V. & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and classical competitive strategies of maritime transport firms: A contingency-fit perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Lee, Choong Bae & Wan, Junbin & Shi, Wenming & Li, Kevin, 2014. "A cross-country study of competitiveness of the shipping industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 366-376.
    4. Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Koo, Anita C. & Jarrod Ho, W.C., 2009. "The motivations and added values of embarking on postgraduate professional education: Evidences from the maritime industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 251-258, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. White, A. & Daniel, E.M. & Mohdzain, M., 2005. "The role of emergent information technologies and systems in enabling supply chain agility," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 396-410.
    2. Naim, Mohamed M. & Gosling, Jonathan, 2011. "On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 342-354, May.
    3. Sang M. Lee & David L. Olson & Sang-Heui Lee & Taewon Hwang & Matt S. Shin, 2007. "Entrepreneurial applications of the lean approach to service industries," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 973-987, November.
    4. Yang, Ching-Chiao & Marlow, Peter B. & Lu, Chin-Shan, 2009. "Assessing resources, logistics service capabilities, innovation capabilities and the performance of container shipping services in Taiwan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 4-20, November.
    5. Diéssica Oliveira-Dias & José Moyano-Fuentes & Juan Manuel Maqueira-Marín, 2022. "Understanding the relationships between information technology and lean and agile supply chain strategies: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 973-1005, May.
    6. Thanopoulou, Helen A., 2007. "Chapter 2 A Fleet for the 21st Century: Modern Greek Shipping," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 23-61, January.
    7. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    8. Yongbo Li & Ali Diabat & Chung-Cheng Lu, 2020. "Leagile supplier selection in Chinese textile industries: a DEMATEL approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 303-322, April.
    9. Theotokas, Ioannis, 2007. "Chapter 3 On Top of World Shipping: Greek Shipping Companies' Organization and Management," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 63-93, January.
    10. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Lai, Kee-hung & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2008. "Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 549-564, August.
    11. Romano, Pietro, 2009. "How can fluid dynamics help supply chain management?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 463-472, April.
    12. Yuen, Kum Fai & Thai, Vinh V. & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and classical competitive strategies of maritime transport firms: A contingency-fit perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Bottani, Eleonora, 2009. "A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 380-391, June.
    14. Agarwal, Ashish & Shankar, Ravi & Tiwari, M.K., 2006. "Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 211-225, August.
    15. Srinivasan, Mahesh & Srivastava, Prashant & Iyer, Karthik N.S., 2020. "Response strategy to environment context factors using a lean and agile approach: Implications for firm performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 900-913.
    16. Hristos Karahalios & Z.L. Yang & J. Wang, 2015. "A risk appraisal system regarding the implementation of maritime regulations by a ship operator," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 389-413, May.
    17. Kum Fai Yuen & Vinh V. Thai, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and service quality provision in shipping firms: financial synergies or trade-offs?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 131-146, January.
    18. Dias, J.C. Quaresma & Calado, J.M.F. & Mendonça, M.C., 2010. "The role of European «ro-ro» port terminals in the automotive supply chain management," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 116-124.
    19. Yuen, Kum Fai & Thai, Vinh V. & Wong, Yiik Diew & Wang, Xueqin, 2018. "Interaction impacts of corporate social responsibility and service quality on shipping firms’ performance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 397-409.
    20. Baker, Peter, 2008. "The design and operation of distribution centres within agile supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 27-41, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:95-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.