IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v63y2016icp423-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying the most significant input parameters for predicting global solar radiation using an ANFIS selection procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammadi, Kasra
  • Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
  • Kamsin, Amirrudin
  • Lai, P.C.
  • Mansor, Zulkefli

Abstract

There are several variables that influence the global solar radiation (GSR) prediction; thus, determining the most significant parameters is an important task to achieve accurate predictions. In this paper, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is employed to identify the most relevant parameters for prediction of daily GSR. Three cities of Isfahan, Kerman and Tabass distributed in central and south central parts of Iran are considered as case studies. The ANFIS process for variable selection includes evaluating several combinations of input parameters for three cases with 1, 2 and 3 inputs to recognize the most relevant sets. To achieve this, nine parameters of sunshine duration (n), maximum possible sunshine duration (N), minimum, maximum and average air temperatures (Tmin, Tmax and Tavg), relative humidity (Rh), water vapor pressure (VP), sea level pressure (P) and extraterrestrial radiation (Ho) are considered. The results reveal that an optimum sets of inputs are not identical for all cities due to difference in climate conditions and solar radiation characteristics. According to the results, considering the most relevant combinations of 2 input parameters is the more appropriate option for all cities to achieve more accuracy and less complexity in predictions. The survey results emphasize the importance of appropriate selection of input parameters to predict daily GSR. Such suitable, simple and accurate prediction is profitable to properly design and evaluate the performance of solar energy systems, which subsequently leads to technical and economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammadi, Kasra & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Kamsin, Amirrudin & Lai, P.C. & Mansor, Zulkefli, 2016. "Identifying the most significant input parameters for predicting global solar radiation using an ANFIS selection procedure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 423-434.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:63:y:2016:i:c:p:423-434
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116301770
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yacef, R. & Benghanem, M. & Mellit, A., 2012. "Prediction of daily global solar irradiation data using Bayesian neural network: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 146-154.
    2. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2016. "Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean horizontal diffuse solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 246-260.
    3. Kaplanis, S. & Kumar, Jatin & Kaplani, E., 2016. "On a universal model for the prediction of the daily global solar radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 178-188.
    4. Bahel, V. & Srinivasan, R. & Bakhsh, H., 1987. "Statistical comparison of correlations for estimation of global horizontal solar radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(12), pages 1309-1316.
    5. López, G. & Batlles, F.J. & Tovar-Pescador, J., 2005. "Selection of input parameters to model direct solar irradiance by using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1675-1684.
    6. Gairaa, Kacem & Khellaf, Abdallah & Messlem, Youcef & Chellali, Farouk, 2016. "Estimation of the daily global solar radiation based on Box–Jenkins and ANN models: A combined approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 238-249.
    7. Yadav, Amit Kumar & Malik, Hasmat & Chandel, S.S., 2014. "Selection of most relevant input parameters using WEKA for artificial neural network based solar radiation prediction models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 509-519.
    8. Olatomiwa, Lanre & Mekhilef, Saad & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Petković, Dalibor, 2015. "Adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for solar radiation prediction in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1784-1791.
    9. Bosch, J.L. & López, G. & Batlles, F.J., 2008. "Daily solar irradiation estimation over a mountainous area using artificial neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1622-1628.
    10. Mohammadi, Kasra & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Petković, Dalibor & Khorasanizadeh, Hossein, 2016. "Determining the most important variables for diffuse solar radiation prediction using adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology; case study: City of Kerman, Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1570-1579.
    11. Mostafavi, Elham Sadat & Ramiyani, Sara Saeidi & Sarvar, Rahim & Moud, Hashem Izadi & Mousavi, Seyyed Mohammad, 2013. "A hybrid computational approach to estimate solar global radiation: An empirical evidence from Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 204-210.
    12. Bahel, V. & Bakhsh, H. & Srinivasan, R., 1987. "A correlation for estimation of global solar radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 131-135.
    13. Nikolić, Vlastimir & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Petković, Dalibor & Mohammadi, Kasra & Ćojbašić, Žarko & Altameem, Torki A. & Gani, Abdullah, 2015. "Wind wake influence estimation on energy production of wind farm by adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 361-372.
    14. Boland, John & Huang, Jing & Ridley, Barbara, 2013. "Decomposing global solar radiation into its direct and diffuse components," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 749-756.
    15. Will, A. & Bustos, J. & Bocco, M. & Gotay, J. & Lamelas, C., 2013. "On the use of niching genetic algorithms for variable selection in solar radiation estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 168-176.
    16. Wu, Yujie & Wang, Jianzhou, 2016. "A novel hybrid model based on artificial neural networks for solar radiation prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 268-284.
    17. Yadav, Amit Kumar & Chandel, S.S., 2015. "Solar energy potential assessment of western Himalayan Indian state of Himachal Pradesh using J48 algorithm of WEKA in ANN based prediction model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 675-693.
    18. Ododo, J.C. & Sulaiman, A.T. & Aidan, J. & Yuguda, M.M. & Ogbu, F.A., 1995. "The importance of maximum air temperature in the parameterisation of solar radiation in Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 6(7), pages 751-763.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guosheng Duan & Lifeng Wu & Fa Liu & Yicheng Wang & Shaofei Wu, 2022. "Improvement in Solar-Radiation Forecasting Based on Evolutionary KNEA Method and Numerical Weather Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Baser, Furkan & Demirhan, Haydar, 2017. "A fuzzy regression with support vector machine approach to the estimation of horizontal global solar radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 229-240.
    3. A. Bassam & O. May Tzuc & M. Escalante Soberanis & L. J. Ricalde & B. Cruz, 2017. "Temperature Estimation for Photovoltaic Array Using an Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Wang, Jianzhou & Dong, Yunxuan & Zhang, Kequan & Guo, Zhenhai, 2017. "A numerical model based on prior distribution fuzzy inference and neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 486-497.
    5. Kisi, Ozgur & Heddam, Salim & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2019. "The implementation of univariable scheme-based air temperature for solar radiation prediction: New development of dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 184-195.
    6. Mohamed Chaibi & EL Mahjoub Benghoulam & Lhoussaine Tarik & Mohamed Berrada & Abdellah El Hmaidi, 2021. "An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Daily Global Solar Radiation Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Olubayo M. Babatunde & Josiah L. Munda & Yskandar Hamam, 2020. "Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Neural Network Trained with Differential Evolution for Estimating Global Solar Radiation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Youssef Kassem & Hüseyin Çamur & Salman Mohammed Awadh Alhuoti, 2020. "Solar Energy Technology for Northern Cyprus: Assessment, Statistical Analysis, and Feasibility Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-29, February.
    9. Rohani, Abbas & Taki, Morteza & Abdollahpour, Masoumeh, 2018. "A novel soft computing model (Gaussian process regression with K-fold cross validation) for daily and monthly solar radiation forecasting (Part: I)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-422.
    10. Jiang, Chengcheng & Zhu, Qunzhi, 2023. "Evaluating the most significant input parameters for forecasting global solar radiation of different sequences based on Informer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    11. Amir Mosavi & Mohsen Salimi & Sina Faizollahzadeh Ardabili & Timon Rabczuk & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Annamaria R. Varkonyi-Koczy, 2019. "State of the Art of Machine Learning Models in Energy Systems, a Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-42, April.
    12. Bizuayehu Abebe Worke & Hans Bludszuweit & José A. Domínguez-Navarro, 2020. "Solar Radiation Estimation Using Data Mining Techniques for Remote Areas—A Case Study in Ethiopia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Abdallah Alsayed & Hayder Sadir & Raja Kamil & Hasan Sari, 2020. "Prediction of Epidemic Peak and Infected Cases for COVID-19 Disease in Malaysia, 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Mohammad Rezaie-Balf & Niloofar Maleki & Sungwon Kim & Ali Ashrafian & Fatemeh Babaie-Miri & Nam Won Kim & Il-Moon Chung & Sina Alaghmand, 2019. "Forecasting Daily Solar Radiation Using CEEMDAN Decomposition-Based MARS Model Trained by Crow Search Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Hossein Moayedi & Amir Mosavi, 2021. "An Innovative Metaheuristic Strategy for Solar Energy Management through a Neural Networks Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Rami Alamoudi & Osman Taylan & Mehmet Azmi Aktacir & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2021. "Designing a Solar Photovoltaic System for Generating Renewable Energy of a Hospital: Performance Analysis and Adjustment Based on RSM and ANFIS Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammadi, Kasra & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Petković, Dalibor & Khorasanizadeh, Hossein, 2016. "Determining the most important variables for diffuse solar radiation prediction using adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology; case study: City of Kerman, Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1570-1579.
    2. Shubham Gupta & Amit Kumar Singh & Sachin Mishra & Pradeep Vishnuram & Nagaraju Dharavat & Narayanamoorthi Rajamanickam & Ch. Naga Sai Kalyan & Kareem M. AboRas & Naveen Kumar Sharma & Mohit Bajaj, 2023. "Estimation of Solar Radiation with Consideration of Terrestrial Losses at a Selected Location—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    3. Samuel Chukwujindu, Nwokolo, 2017. "A comprehensive review of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 955-995.
    4. Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Mohammadi, Kasra & Yee, Por Lip & Petković, Dalibor & Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2015. "A comparative evaluation for identifying the suitability of extreme learning machine to predict horizontal global solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1031-1042.
    5. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Mert, Cihan & Kisi, Ozgur, 2018. "Comparison of four heuristic regression techniques in solar radiation modeling: Kriging method vs RSM, MARS and M5 model tree," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 330-341.
    6. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
    7. Kambezidis, H.D. & Psiloglou, B.E. & Karagiannis, D. & Dumka, U.C. & Kaskaoutis, D.G., 2017. "Meteorological Radiation Model (MRM v6.1): Improvements in diffuse radiation estimates and a new approach for implementation of cloud products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 616-637.
    8. Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Zhu, Zhongmin & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 384-397.
    9. Hussain, Sajid & Al-Alili, Ali, 2016. "A new approach for model validation in solar radiation using wavelet, phase and frequency coherence analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 639-649.
    10. Jamil, Basharat & Akhtar, Naiem, 2017. "Comparison of empirical models to estimate monthly mean diffuse solar radiation from measured data: Case study for humid-subtropical climatic region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1326-1342.
    11. Rohani, Abbas & Taki, Morteza & Abdollahpour, Masoumeh, 2018. "A novel soft computing model (Gaussian process regression with K-fold cross validation) for daily and monthly solar radiation forecasting (Part: I)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-422.
    12. Benkaciali, Saïd & Haddadi, Mourad & Khellaf, Abdellah, 2018. "Evaluation of direct solar irradiance from 18 broadband parametric models: Case of Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 694-711.
    13. Olubayo M. Babatunde & Josiah L. Munda & Yskandar Hamam, 2020. "Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Neural Network Trained with Differential Evolution for Estimating Global Solar Radiation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Akarslan, Emre & Hocaoglu, Fatih Onur & Edizkan, Rifat, 2018. "Novel short term solar irradiance forecasting models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 58-66.
    15. Linares-Rodriguez, Alvaro & Ruiz-Arias, José Antonio & Pozo-Vazquez, David & Tovar-Pescador, Joaquin, 2013. "An artificial neural network ensemble model for estimating global solar radiation from Meteosat satellite images," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 636-645.
    16. Akarslan, Emre & Hocaoglu, Fatih Onur, 2017. "A novel method based on similarity for hourly solar irradiance forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 337-346.
    17. Rao K, D.V. Siva Krishna & Premalatha, M. & Naveen, C., 2018. "Analysis of different combinations of meteorological parameters in predicting the horizontal global solar radiation with ANN approach: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 248-258.
    18. Chen, Ji-Long & He, Lei & Yang, Hong & Ma, Maohua & Chen, Qiao & Wu, Sheng-Jun & Xiao, Zuo-lin, 2019. "Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: A most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-111.
    19. Prieto, Jesús-Ignacio & García, David, 2022. "Global solar radiation models: A critical review from the point of view of homogeneity and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Jamil, Basharat & Akhtar, Naiem, 2017. "Estimation of diffuse solar radiation in humid-subtropical climatic region of India: Comparison of diffuse fraction and diffusion coefficient models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 149-164.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:63:y:2016:i:c:p:423-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.