IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v60y2016icp155-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The world availability of non-wood lignocellulosic biomass for the production of cellulosic ethanol and potential pretreatments for the enhancement of enzymatic saccharification

Author

Listed:
  • Tye, Ying Ying
  • Lee, Keat Teong
  • Wan Abdullah, Wan Nadiah
  • Leh, Cheu Peng

Abstract

Non-wood lignocellulosic biomass is abundantly available, low cost, easy to process and consists of a short growth and harvest period; therefore, it is introduced as a potential feedstock biomass for bioethanol production. Common non-wood lignocellulosic biomasses are categorised into agricultural residues, native and non-wood plant fibres. The potential of non-wood lignocellulosic biomass as a resource for cellulosic ethanol production are determined and, analyzed in the context of their chemical composition, fibre production yield, total cellulose availability as well as the enzymatic saccharification efficiency after pretreatment. Based on the obtained data, agricultural residues show significant advantages in all contexts over other non-wood lignocellulosic biomasses. Moreover, pretreatment plays an important role in enhancing the enzymatic accessibility and hydrolysability of non-wood biomass. This review found that various pretreatments could be applied to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysability of different biomasses; however the major factors that vary the effectiveness of particular pretreatment on improving of different biomass hydrolysability have not been clearly highlighted. In addition, even though enzymatic saccharification of pretreated biomass is mainly highlighted in most of the cellulosic ethanol studies to evaluate the improvement of biomass hydrolysability, this data is unable to show the total glucose that obtained from the untreated biomass directly. In this study, the importance of total glucose yield is emphasized and it is calculated from various research data by multiplying the solid recovery yield by the enzymatic saccharification yield of the pretreated biomass, as it presents the percentage of the total glucose that could be converted directly from the original biomass. This work verifies that besides enzymatic saccharification yield, the solid recovery yield is also one of the major factors to be identified in cellulosic ethanol study.

Suggested Citation

  • Tye, Ying Ying & Lee, Keat Teong & Wan Abdullah, Wan Nadiah & Leh, Cheu Peng, 2016. "The world availability of non-wood lignocellulosic biomass for the production of cellulosic ethanol and potential pretreatments for the enhancement of enzymatic saccharification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 155-172.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:60:y:2016:i:c:p:155-172
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116001027
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Response Surface Methodology," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 81-104, Springer.
    2. Cheng, Jay J. & Timilsina, Govinda R, 2010. "Advanced biofuel technologies : status and barriers," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5411, The World Bank.
    3. Miao, Ruiqing & Khanna, Madhu, 2013. "Crop Insurance for Energy Grasses," 2013 AAEA: Crop Insurance and the Farm Bill Symposium 156936, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Sarkar, Nibedita & Ghosh, Sumanta Kumar & Bannerjee, Satarupa & Aikat, Kaustav, 2012. "Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 19-27.
    5. Jeun, Joon-Pyo & Lee, Byoung-Min & Lee, Jin-Young & Kang, Phil-Hyun & Park, Jung-Ki, 2015. "An irradiation-alkaline pretreatment of kenaf core for improving the sugar yield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 51-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohapatra, Sonali & Mishra, Chinmaya & Behera, Sudhansu S. & Thatoi, Hrudayanath, 2017. "Application of pretreatment, fermentation and molecular techniques for enhancing bioethanol production from grass biomass – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1007-1032.
    2. Ullah, Kifayat & Sharma, Vinod Kumar & Ahmad, Mushtaq & Lv, Pengmei & Krahl, Jurgen & Wang, Zhongming & Sofia,, 2018. "The insight views of advanced technologies and its application in bio-origin fuel synthesis from lignocellulose biomasses waste, a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3992-4008.
    3. Zabed, H. & Sahu, J.N. & Boyce, A.N. & Faruq, G., 2016. "Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: An overview on feedstocks and technological approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 751-774.
    4. Tye, Ying Ying & Leh, Cheu Peng & Wan Abdullah, Wan Nadiah, 2017. "Total glucose yield as the single response in optimizing pretreatments for Elaeis guineensis fibre enzymatic hydrolysis and its relationship with chemical composition of fibre," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 383-393.
    5. Hameed, Zeeshan & Aslam, Muhammad & Khan, Zakir & Maqsood, Khuram & Atabani, A.E. & Ghauri, Moinuddin & Khurram, Muhammad Shahzad & Rehan, Mohammad & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar, 2021. "Gasification of municipal solid waste blends with biomass for energy production and resources recovery: Current status, hybrid technologies and innovative prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Yong Sun & Zhi Wang & Yuyingnan Liu & Xianghui Meng & Jingbo Qu & Changyu Liu & Bin Qu, 2019. "A Review on the Transformation of Furfural Residue for Value-Added Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ghosh, Shiladitya & Chowdhury, Ranjana & Bhattacharya, Pinaki, 2017. "Sustainability of cereal straws for the fermentative production of second generation biofuels: A review of the efficiency and economics of biochemical pretreatment processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 284-298.
    8. Yong, Wilson Thau Lym & Thien, Vun Yee & Rupert, Rennielyn & Rodrigues, Kenneth Francis, 2022. "Seaweed: A potential climate change solution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Djukić-Vuković, A. & Mladenović, D. & Ivanović, J. & Pejin, J. & Mojović, L., 2019. "Towards sustainability of lactic acid and poly-lactic acid polymers production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 238-252.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Marta Ramos & Ana Paula Soares Dias & Jaime Filipe Puna & João Gomes & João Carlos Bordado, 2019. "Biodiesel Production Processes and Sustainable Raw Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-30, November.
    3. Pandey, Ajay Kumar & Edgard, Gnansounou & Negi, Sangeeta, 2016. "Optimization of concomitant production of cellulase and xylanase from Rhizopus oryzae SN5 through EVOP-factorial design technique and application in Sorghum Stover based bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 51-56.
    4. Zabed, H. & Sahu, J.N. & Boyce, A.N. & Faruq, G., 2016. "Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: An overview on feedstocks and technological approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 751-774.
    5. Shen-Tsu Wang, 2016. "Integrating grey sequencing with the genetic algorithm--immune algorithm to optimise touch panel cover glass polishing process parameter design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4882-4893, August.
    6. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Bayrakci, Asiye Gül & Koçar, Günnur, 2014. "Second-generation bioethanol production from water hyacinth and duckweed in Izmir: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 306-316.
    8. Qin, Caiyan & Kim, Joong Bae & Lee, Bong Jae, 2019. "Performance analysis of a direct-absorption parabolic-trough solar collector using plasmonic nanofluids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 24-33.
    9. Kaushik, Lav Kumar & Muthukumar, P., 2020. "Thermal and economic performance assessments of waste cooking oil /kerosene blend operated pressure cook-stove with porous radiant burner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Yaman, Hayri & Yesilyurt, Murat Kadir & Uslu, Samet, 2022. "Simultaneous optimization of multiple engine parameters of a 1-heptanol / gasoline fuel blends operated a port-fuel injection spark-ignition engine using response surface methodology approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    11. Visva Bharati Barua & Mariya Munir, 2021. "A Review on Synchronous Microalgal Lipid Enhancement and Wastewater Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    13. D. M. D. Rasika & Janak K. Vidanarachchi & Selma F. Luiz & Denise Rosane Perdomo Azeredo & Adriano G. Cruz & Chaminda Senaka Ranadheera, 2021. "Probiotic Delivery through Non-Dairy Plant-Based Food Matrices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Motevali, Ali & Ghobadian, Barat, 2019. "Ethanol production from date wastes: Adapted technologies, challenges, and global potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1094-1110.
    15. Muhammad, Gul & Potchamyou Ngatcha, Ange Douglas & Lv, Yongkun & Xiong, Wenlong & El-Badry, Yaser A. & Asmatulu, Eylem & Xu, Jingliang & Alam, Md Asraful, 2022. "Enhanced biodiesel production from wet microalgae biomass optimized via response surface methodology and artificial neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 753-764.
    16. Renzi, Massimiliano & Bietresato, Marco & Mazzetto, Fabrizio, 2016. "An experimental evaluation of the performance of a SI internal combustion engine for agricultural purposes fuelled with different bioethanol blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1069-1080.
    17. Chamberlin Stéphane Azebaze Mboving & Zbigniew Hanzelka & Andrzej Firlit, 2022. "Analysis of the Factors Having an Influence on the LC Passive Harmonic Filter Work Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-51, March.
    18. Lu Chen & Qincheng Chen & Pinhua Rao & Lili Yan & Alghashm Shakib & Guoqing Shen, 2018. "Formulating and Optimizing a Novel Biochar-Based Fertilizer for Simultaneous Slow-Release of Nitrogen and Immobilization of Cadmium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Assar, Hossein Alizadeh & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Potential of biofuel production from pistachio waste in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    20. Biranchi Panda & K. Shankhwar & Akhil Garg & M. M. Savalani, 2019. "Evaluation of genetic programming-based models for simulating bead dimensions in wire and arc additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 809-820, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:60:y:2016:i:c:p:155-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.