IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v206y2020ics0360544220312093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal and economic performance assessments of waste cooking oil /kerosene blend operated pressure cook-stove with porous radiant burner

Author

Listed:
  • Kaushik, Lav Kumar
  • Muthukumar, P.

Abstract

Present energy and environmental scenario have been driving researchers to find alternative and renewable energy-based cooking sources. Inspection of Waste Cooking Oil (WCO) as alternative cooking fuel in a pressure cook-stove is the main focus of the present work. Comparative performance assessment of Conventional Kerosene Pressure Stove and Porous Radiant Burner (PRB) based Kerosene Pressure Stove fuelled with blends of WCO and kerosene are presented in this article. Three blend samples (volume % of kerosene and WCO) viz., BS1 (90/10), BS2 (75/25) and BS3 (50/50) have been used for investigation. Emissions (CO and NOx) and efficiencies have been measured to learn about the burners thermal performance and to get additional insight, Control Cooking Test and Techno-economic Assessment have also been performed. Experimental results show that both the stoves are operational up to “BS3” blend sample. In the operational input power range of 1.5–3 kW, with maximum WCO blending, thermal efficiency varied in the range of 45.3–37.8% and 36.2–28.6%, for PRB and conventional cook-stove, respectively. In the case of the stove with PRB, the maximum percentage reduction in CO and NOx emissions are 60% and 83%, respectively, which proves the burner ability to mitigate emissions. Saving in cooking time of 49 min and fuel consumption of 59% on daily basis by the use of PRB also shows its superiority. For a life span of 10 years, the economic assessment of the stove shows that annual savings, cumulative present worth of annual savings, Internal Rate of Return and payback period of the newly developed stoves are $29.93, $244.97, 268.5% and less than five months, respectively. The overall performance assessment shows improved results in all three fronts of energy, emissions, and economy, and suggests WCO can be a potential alternative cooking source when used in PRB.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaushik, Lav Kumar & Muthukumar, P., 2020. "Thermal and economic performance assessments of waste cooking oil /kerosene blend operated pressure cook-stove with porous radiant burner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312093
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220312093
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natarajan, R. & Karthikeyan, N.S. & Agarwaal, Avinash & Sathiyanarayanan, K., 2008. "Use of vegetable oil as fuel to improve the efficiency of cooking stove," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2423-2427.
    2. Sharma, Monikankana & Mahanta, P. & Mishra, Subhash C., 2016. "Usability of porous burner in kerosene pressure stove: An experimental investigation aided by energy and exergy analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 251-260.
    3. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Response Surface Methodology," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 81-104, Springer.
    4. Kratzeisen, M. & Müller, J., 2009. "Effect of fatty acid composition of soybean oil on deposit and performance of plant oil pressure stoves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2461-2466.
    5. Dinesha, P. & Kumar, Shiva & Rosen, Marc A., 2019. "Performance and emission analysis of a domestic wick stove using biofuel feedstock derived from waste cooking oil and sesame oil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 342-351.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muthukumar Palanisamy & Lav Kumar Kaushik & Arun Kumar Mahalingam & Sunita Deb & Pratibha Maurya & Sofia Rani Shaik & Muhammad Abdul Mujeebu, 2023. "Evolutions in Gaseous and Liquid Fuel Cook-Stove Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-37, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muthukumar Palanisamy & Lav Kumar Kaushik & Arun Kumar Mahalingam & Sunita Deb & Pratibha Maurya & Sofia Rani Shaik & Muhammad Abdul Mujeebu, 2023. "Evolutions in Gaseous and Liquid Fuel Cook-Stove Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-37, January.
    2. Mustafa, K.F. & Abdullah, S. & Abdullah, M.Z. & Sopian, K. & Ismail, A.K., 2015. "Experimental investigation of the performance of a liquid fuel-fired porous burner operating on kerosene-vegetable cooking oil (VCO) blends for micro-cogeneration of thermoelectric power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 505-516.
    3. Shen-Tsu Wang, 2016. "Integrating grey sequencing with the genetic algorithm--immune algorithm to optimise touch panel cover glass polishing process parameter design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4882-4893, August.
    4. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Qin, Caiyan & Kim, Joong Bae & Lee, Bong Jae, 2019. "Performance analysis of a direct-absorption parabolic-trough solar collector using plasmonic nanofluids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 24-33.
    6. Yaman, Hayri & Yesilyurt, Murat Kadir & Uslu, Samet, 2022. "Simultaneous optimization of multiple engine parameters of a 1-heptanol / gasoline fuel blends operated a port-fuel injection spark-ignition engine using response surface methodology approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    7. Visva Bharati Barua & Mariya Munir, 2021. "A Review on Synchronous Microalgal Lipid Enhancement and Wastewater Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    9. D. M. D. Rasika & Janak K. Vidanarachchi & Selma F. Luiz & Denise Rosane Perdomo Azeredo & Adriano G. Cruz & Chaminda Senaka Ranadheera, 2021. "Probiotic Delivery through Non-Dairy Plant-Based Food Matrices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, June.
    10. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Muhammad, Gul & Potchamyou Ngatcha, Ange Douglas & Lv, Yongkun & Xiong, Wenlong & El-Badry, Yaser A. & Asmatulu, Eylem & Xu, Jingliang & Alam, Md Asraful, 2022. "Enhanced biodiesel production from wet microalgae biomass optimized via response surface methodology and artificial neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 753-764.
    12. Renzi, Massimiliano & Bietresato, Marco & Mazzetto, Fabrizio, 2016. "An experimental evaluation of the performance of a SI internal combustion engine for agricultural purposes fuelled with different bioethanol blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1069-1080.
    13. Chamberlin Stéphane Azebaze Mboving & Zbigniew Hanzelka & Andrzej Firlit, 2022. "Analysis of the Factors Having an Influence on the LC Passive Harmonic Filter Work Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-51, March.
    14. Lu Chen & Qincheng Chen & Pinhua Rao & Lili Yan & Alghashm Shakib & Guoqing Shen, 2018. "Formulating and Optimizing a Novel Biochar-Based Fertilizer for Simultaneous Slow-Release of Nitrogen and Immobilization of Cadmium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Biranchi Panda & K. Shankhwar & Akhil Garg & M. M. Savalani, 2019. "Evaluation of genetic programming-based models for simulating bead dimensions in wire and arc additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 809-820, February.
    16. Hasheminasab, M. & Kermani, M.J. & Nourazar, S.S. & Khodsiani, M.H., 2020. "A novel experimental based statistical study for water management in proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    17. Zahedi, Ali Reza & Mirnezami, Seyed Abolfazl, 2020. "Experimental analysis of biomass to biodiesel conversion using a novel renewable combined cycle system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1177-1194.
    18. Ahmad Abbaszadeh-Mayvan & Barat Ghobadian & Gholamhassan Najafi & Talal Yusaf, 2018. "Intensification of Continuous Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oils Using Shockwave Power Reactor: Process Evaluation and Optimization through Response Surface Methodology (RSM)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Walid Yeddes & Ines Ouerghemmi & Majdi Hammami & Hamza Gadhoumi & Taycir Grati Affes & Salma Nait Mohamed & Wissem Aidi-Wannes & Dorota Witrowa-Rajchert & Moufida Saidani-Tounsi & Małgorzata Nowacka, 2022. "Optimizing the Method of Rosemary Essential Oils Extraction by Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)-Characterization and Toxicological Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Esther Unyime Etim, 2019. "Removal of Methyl Blue Dye from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption unto Ground Nut Waste," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 15(3), pages 11365-11371, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.