IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v229y2026ics1364032125012328.html

A literature review based on density forecasting and uncertainty quantification of wind power generation

Author

Listed:
  • Rathod, Deepak
  • Gidwani, Lata

Abstract

Accurate density forecasting and uncertainty quantification of wind power generation are critical to the reliable integration of wind power energy into reality. These methods are used to provide the full probability distribution of wind power production while accounting for uncertainties and variability. Despite approaches to density forecasting and uncertainty quantification, forecasting wind power generation remains challenging with definitive boundaries due to inherent limitations of weather forecasts, difficulties in modeling wind, and a lack of high-quality historical data. This study reviews the literature to summarize and highlight the newest developments in wind power forecasting. Specifically, this review compiles 127 largely peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2025 and analyzes available information on density forecasting for wind energy production. In this review, the methods summarized and discussed can be categorized into deterministic and probabilistic forecasting methods, focusing on short- and long-term forecasting methods. This review highlights the key advantages, disadvantages, and potential drawbacks with recommendations provided to enhance wind power generation and use of density forecasting and uncertainty quantification methods, as well as advanced data preprocessing techniques and deep learning networks (e.g., Deep Neural Network (DNN), Deep Belief Network (DBN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Spiking Neural Networks (SNN)) including model configurations with the assistance of metaheuristics (e.g., Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Cuckoo Search (CS)). Furthermore, this study highlights the emerging role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques—including SHAP, LIME, and attention mechanisms—for improving model interpretability and transparency, which are vital for operational trust and decision-making in wind power systems. After thorough analysis, this paper articulates the limitations of current forecasting models and methods for wind energy production and seeks to use density forecasting frameworks and uncertainty quantification methods to improve the accuracy, reliability, and robustness of wind power forecasting systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Rathod, Deepak & Gidwani, Lata, 2026. "A literature review based on density forecasting and uncertainty quantification of wind power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:229:y:2026:i:c:s1364032125012328
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.116559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125012328
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:229:y:2026:i:c:s1364032125012328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.