IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v211y2025ics1364032124010499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modeling framework for biodiversity assessment in renewable energy development: A case study on European bats and wind turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Froidevaux, Jérémy S.P.
  • Le Viol, Isabelle
  • Barré, Kévin
  • Bas, Yves
  • Kerbiriou, Christian

Abstract

Combining renewable energy planning and biodiversity conservation is urgently needed to address the interconnected climate change and biodiversity loss crisis and meet the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals 7,13, and 15. However, in many countries such as France, current strategies to limit the negative effects of renewable energy on biodiversity still hold major limitations during the planning process that could be overcome with modeling approaches. Here we propose a new modeling-based framework which aims to determine potential threats posed by projects to biodiversity. By capitalizing on large-scale standardized citizen science biodiversity data to create biodiversity benchmarks, this approach aims to better inform the Ecological Impact Assessment (EIA) process at different stages pre- and post-project construction. We demonstrate the practical application of the framework using bats and onshore wind energy development in France as a case study. We reveal that current approaches in renewable energy planning in France failed to identify sites of biodiversity significance with >90 % of wind turbines approved for construction to be placed in sites of high significance for bats. The risks posed by future wind turbines to bats concern all taxa (all protected in the EU), including species with higher collision risks. We highlight how the proposed modeling-based framework could contribute to a more objective evaluation of pre- and post-construction impacts on biodiversity and become a prevalent component of the EIA process. Its implementation could promote a more biodiversity-friendly approach to renewable energy planning, aligning with the Global Biodiversity Framework's target of halting biodiversity loss by 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Froidevaux, Jérémy S.P. & Le Viol, Isabelle & Barré, Kévin & Bas, Yves & Kerbiriou, Christian, 2025. "A modeling framework for biodiversity assessment in renewable energy development: A case study on European bats and wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124010499
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124010499
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taber Allison & Terry Root & Peter Frumhoff, 2014. "Thinking globally and siting locally – renewable energy and biodiversity in a rapidly warming world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 1-6, September.
    2. Christophe Giraud & Clément Calenge & Camille Coron & Romain Julliard, 2016. "Capitalizing on opportunistic data for monitoring relative abundances of species," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 649-658, June.
    3. Gasparatos, Alexandros & Doll, Christopher N.H. & Esteban, Miguel & Ahmed, Abubakari & Olang, Tabitha A., 2017. "Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 161-184.
    4. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2016. "Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean horizontal diffuse solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 246-260.
    5. Paul A Rabie & Brandi Welch-Acosta & Kristen Nasman & Susan Schumacher & Steve Schueller & Jeffery Gruver, 2022. "Efficacy and cost of acoustic-informed and wind speed-only turbine curtailment to reduce bat fatalities at a wind energy facility in Wisconsin," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Cribari-Neto, Francisco & Zeileis, Achim, 2010. "Beta Regression in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 34(i02).
    7. Georgina M. Mace & Mike Barrett & Neil D. Burgess & Sarah E. Cornell & Robin Freeman & Monique Grooten & Andy Purvis, 2018. "Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(9), pages 448-451, September.
    8. Dai, Kaoshan & Bergot, Anthony & Liang, Chao & Xiang, Wei-Ning & Huang, Zhenhua, 2015. "Environmental issues associated with wind energy – A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 911-921.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire Burch & Rebecca Loraamm & Travis Gliedt, 2020. "The “Green on Green” Conflict in Wind Energy Development: A Case Study of Environmentally Conscious Individuals in Oklahoma, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Willsteed, Edward A. & Jude, Simon & Gill, Andrew B. & Birchenough, Silvana N.R., 2018. "Obligations and aspirations: A critical evaluation of offshore wind farm cumulative impact assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2332-2345.
    3. Feuerbacher, Arndt & Herrmann, Tristan & Neuenfeldt, Sebastian & Laub, Moritz & Gocht, Alexander, 2022. "Estimating the economics and adoption potential of agrivoltaics in Germany using a farm-level bottom-up approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Yang Shen & Xiuwu Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Ameztegui, Aitor & Coll, Lluís & Messier, Christian, 2015. "Modelling the effect of climate-induced changes in recruitment and juvenile growth on mixed-forest dynamics: The case of montane–subalpine Pyrenean ecotones," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 84-93.
    6. Kieu Anh Nguyen & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang, 2020. "Using Machine Learning-Based Algorithms to Analyze Erosion Rates of a Watershed in Northern Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Tariq Ullah & Krzysztof Sobczak & Grzegorz Liśkiewicz & Amjid Khan, 2022. "Two-Dimensional URANS Numerical Investigation of Critical Parameters on a Pitch Oscillating VAWT Airfoil under Dynamic Stall," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Grün, Bettina & Kosmidis, Ioannis & Zeileis, Achim, 2012. "Extended Beta Regression in R: Shaken, Stirred, Mixed, and Partitioned," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i11).
    9. Martínez-Martínez, Yenisleidy & Dewulf, Jo & Casas-Ledón, Yannay, 2022. "GIS-based site suitability analysis and ecosystem services approach for supporting renewable energy development in south-central Chile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 363-376.
    10. Schumacher, Kim & Yang, Zhuoxiang, 2018. "The determinants of wind energy growth in the United States: Drivers and barriers to state-level development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Lee, Kyung-Sook & Kim, Ju-Hee & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2021. "Would people pay a price premium for electricity from domestic wind power facilities? The case of South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. A. G. Olabi & Khaled Obaideen & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Maryam Nooman AlMallahi & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Ayman Mdallal & Asma Ali Murah Hassan & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Salomon, Hannes & Drechsler, Martin & Reutter, Felix, 2020. "Minimum distances for wind turbines: A robustness analysis of policies for a sustainable wind power deployment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    14. Moravec, David & Barták, Vojtěch & Puš, Vladimír & Wild, Jan, 2018. "Wind turbine impact on near-ground air temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 627-633.
    15. Zhang, Dengjun & Xie, Yifan, 2022. "Customer environmental concerns and profit margin: Evidence from manufacturing firms," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    17. Eitan, Avri, 2025. "Navigating sustainability trade-offs in wind energy governance: The role of environmental regulators," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Luo, Laipeng & Zhang, Zhiyi & Li, Chong & Nishu, & He, Fang & Zhang, Xingguang & Cai, Junmeng, 2021. "Insight into master plots method for kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Yukako Sado-Inamura & Kensuke Fukushi, 2018. "Considering Water Quality of Urban Rivers from the Perspectives of Unpleasant Odor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Aarón Garavito & Ana Mar�a Iregui & Mar�a Teresa Ram�rez, 2014. "An Empirical Examination of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Firm-Level Analysis for the Colombian Economy," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124010499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.