IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v178y2023ics1364032123001211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of a tiered top-down approach using satellite and aircraft platforms to monitor oil and gas facilities in the Permian basin

Author

Listed:
  • Esparza, Ángel E.
  • Rowan, Gillian
  • Newhook, Ashley
  • Deglint, Hanford J.
  • Garrison, Billy
  • Orth-Lashley, Bryn
  • Girard, Marianne
  • Shaw, Warren

Abstract

As energy systems transition towards decarbonization, natural gas is expected to play an important role as a cleaner hydrocarbon fuel source to bridge the gap between renewable energy production and increasing energy demand. Regulations aim to reduce methane emissions from natural gas systems to ensure the total environmental impacts of natural gas production and consumption are indeed lesser than for other fossil fuels. GHGSat Inc., has developed a tiered top-down remote sensing approach utilizing satellite and airborne instruments to monitor methane emissions from industrial sites globally. This satellite-aircraft hybrid system was demonstrated in the Permian basin for detecting and quantifying methane emissions from oil and gas (O&G) facilities. A heavy-tail distribution of methane emissions was observed, with 12% of emitting targets (total sample size of 106) accounting for over 50% of total detected methane emissions. Traditional leak detection and repair (LDAR) programs often incorporate multiple annual screening campaigns with ground-based optical gas imaging (OGI) technologies to detect methane leaks from O&G infrastructure. Three alternative LDAR programs incorporating GHGSat's satellite and airborne monitoring technologies were modelled using the Arolytics AroFEMP methane model. Model parameters were derived from GHGSat's 2021 Permian basin data to evaluate their equivalency and costs against traditional LDAR monitoring. When compared to the required practice of performing OGI surveys four times per year, the proposed alternative LDAR programs were modelled to have at least equivalent methane reduction performance while being substantially more cost-effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Esparza, Ángel E. & Rowan, Gillian & Newhook, Ashley & Deglint, Hanford J. & Garrison, Billy & Orth-Lashley, Bryn & Girard, Marianne & Shaw, Warren, 2023. "Analysis of a tiered top-down approach using satellite and aircraft platforms to monitor oil and gas facilities in the Permian basin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:178:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123001211
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123001211
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto F. Aguilera & Roberto Aguilera, 2020. "Revisiting the role of natural gas as a transition fuel," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 33(1), pages 73-80, July.
    2. Aguilera, Roberto F. & Aguilera, Roberto, 2012. "World natural gas endowment as a bridge towards zero carbon emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 579-586.
    3. Gürsan, C. & de Gooyert, V., 2021. "The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Mier, Mathias & Weissbart, Christoph, 2020. "Power markets in transition: Decarbonization, energy efficiency, and short-term demand response," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    5. Riley M. Duren & Andrew K. Thorpe & Kelsey T. Foster & Talha Rafiq & Francesca M. Hopkins & Vineet Yadav & Brian D. Bue & David R. Thompson & Stephen Conley & Nadia K. Colombi & Christian Frankenberg , 2019. "California’s methane super-emitters," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 180-184, November.
    6. Anukoolthamchote, Pam Chasuta & Assané, Djeto & Konan, Denise Eby, 2020. "Net electricity load profiles: Shape and variability considering customer-mix at transformers on the island of Oahu, Hawai'i," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy & Shahzad, Umer & Doğan, Buhari, 2022. "The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santillán Vera, Mónica & García Manrique, Lilia & Rodríguez Peña, Isabel & De La Vega Navarro, Angel, 2023. "Drivers of electricity GHG emissions and the role of natural gas in mexican energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Monica Santillan Vera & Lilia Garcia Manrique & Isabel Rodriguez Pena & Angel de la Vega Navarro, 2021. "Drivers of Electricity GHG Emissions and the Role of Natural Gas in Mexican Energy Transition," Working Paper Series 1021, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    3. Wang, Delu & Gan, Jun & Mao, Jinqi & Chen, Fan & Yu, Lan, 2023. "Forecasting power demand in China with a CNN-LSTM model including multimodal information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    4. Ravago, Majah-Leah V. & Fabella, Raul V. & Jandoc, Karl Robert L. & Frias, Renzi G. & Magadia, J. Kathleen P., 2021. "Gauging the market potential for natural gas among Philippine manufacturing firms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Shuguang Liu & Jiayi Wang & Yin Long, 2023. "Research into the Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Technological Innovation in China’s Natural Gas Industry from the Perspective of Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    6. Salman, Muhammad & Long, Xingle & Wang, Guimei & Zha, Donglan, 2022. "Paris climate agreement and global environmental efficiency: New evidence from fuzzy regression discontinuity design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Roberto F. Aguilera & Roberto Aguilera, 2020. "Revisiting the role of natural gas as a transition fuel," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 33(1), pages 73-80, July.
    8. Gürsan, C. & de Gooyert, V., 2021. "The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Gozgor, Giray & Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy, 2022. "Does energy diversification cause an economic slowdown? Evidence from a newly constructed energy diversification index," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Sen, Suphi & von Schickfus, Marie-Theres, 2020. "Climate policy, stranded assets, and investors’ expectations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Malak Anshassi & Timothy G. Townsend, 2023. "The hidden economic and environmental costs of eliminating kerb-side recycling," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(8), pages 919-928, August.
    12. Zhou, Zhongbing & Qin, Quande, 2020. "Decoding China's natural gas development: A critical discourse analysis of the five-year plans," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Zheng, Li & Yuan, Ling & Khan, Zeeshan & Badeeb, Ramez Abubakr & Zhang, Leilei, 2023. "How G-7 countries are paving the way for net-zero emissions through energy efficient ecosystem?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Guan, Zepeng & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Sheikh, Muhammad Ramzan & Khan, Zeeshan & Gu, Xiao, 2023. "Unveiling the interconnectedness between energy-related GHGs and pro-environmental energy technology: Lessons from G-7 economies with MMQR approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    15. Wang, Bin & Liu, Shuyang & Wang, Pengfei, 2022. "Microwave-assisted high-efficient gas production of depressurization-induced methane hydrate exploitation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    16. Prokop, Viktor & Gerstlberger, Wolfgang & Zapletal, David & Gyamfi, Solomon, 2023. "Do we need human capital heterogeneity for energy efficiency and innovativeness? Insights from European catching-up territories," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Fotio, Herve Kaffo & Nchofoung, Tii N. & Asongu, Simplice A., 2022. "Financing renewable energy generation in SSA: Does financial integration matter?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 47-59.
    18. Yadong Pei & Chiou-Jye Huang & Yamin Shen & Mingyue Wang, 2023. "A Novel Model for Spot Price Forecast of Natural Gas Based on Temporal Convolutional Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Tan, Xiujie & Xiao, Ziwei & Liu, Yishuang & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Wang, Banban & Dong, Hanmin, 2022. "The effect of green credit policy on energy efficiency: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Liu, Qiang & Zhao, Zhongwei & Liu, Yiran & He, Yao, 2022. "Natural resources commodity prices volatility, economic performance and environment: Evaluating the role of oil rents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:178:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123001211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.