IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v575y2019i7781d10.1038_s41586-019-1720-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

California’s methane super-emitters

Author

Listed:
  • Riley M. Duren

    (California Institute of Technology
    University of Arizona)

  • Andrew K. Thorpe

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Kelsey T. Foster

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Talha Rafiq

    (University of California Riverside)

  • Francesca M. Hopkins

    (University of California Riverside)

  • Vineet Yadav

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Brian D. Bue

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • David R. Thompson

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Stephen Conley

    (Scientific Aviation)

  • Nadia K. Colombi

    (University of California Los Angeles)

  • Christian Frankenberg

    (California Institute of Technology
    California Institute of Technology)

  • Ian B. McCubbin

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Michael L. Eastwood

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Matthias Falk

    (California Air Resources Board)

  • Jorn D. Herner

    (California Air Resources Board)

  • Bart E. Croes

    (California Air Resources Board)

  • Robert O. Green

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Charles E. Miller

    (California Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas and is targeted for emissions mitigation by the US state of California and other jurisdictions worldwide1,2. Unique opportunities for mitigation are presented by point-source emitters—surface features or infrastructure components that are typically less than 10 metres in diameter and emit plumes of highly concentrated methane3. However, data on point-source emissions are sparse and typically lack sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to guide their mitigation and to accurately assess their magnitude4. Here we survey more than 272,000 infrastructure elements in California using an airborne imaging spectrometer that can rapidly map methane plumes5–7. We conduct five campaigns over several months from 2016 to 2018, spanning the oil and gas, manure-management and waste-management sectors, resulting in the detection, geolocation and quantification of emissions from 564 strong methane point sources. Our remote sensing approach enables the rapid and repeated assessment of large areas at high spatial resolution for a poorly characterized population of methane emitters that often appear intermittently and stochastically. We estimate net methane point-source emissions in California to be 0.618 teragrams per year (95 per cent confidence interval 0.523–0.725), equivalent to 34–46 per cent of the state’s methane inventory8 for 2016. Methane ‘super-emitter’ activity occurs in every sector surveyed, with 10 per cent of point sources contributing roughly 60 per cent of point-source emissions—consistent with a study of the US Four Corners region that had a different sectoral mix9. The largest methane emitters in California are a subset of landfills, which exhibit persistent anomalous activity. Methane point-source emissions in California are dominated by landfills (41 per cent), followed by dairies (26 per cent) and the oil and gas sector (26 per cent). Our data have enabled the identification of the 0.2 per cent of California’s infrastructure that is responsible for these emissions. Sharing these data with collaborating infrastructure operators has led to the mitigation of anomalous methane-emission activity10.

Suggested Citation

  • Riley M. Duren & Andrew K. Thorpe & Kelsey T. Foster & Talha Rafiq & Francesca M. Hopkins & Vineet Yadav & Brian D. Bue & David R. Thompson & Stephen Conley & Nadia K. Colombi & Christian Frankenberg , 2019. "California’s methane super-emitters," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 180-184, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:575:y:2019:i:7781:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1720-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1720-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1720-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1720-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongxue Liu & Yuling Pu & Xueying Hu & Yanzhu Dong & Wei Wu & Chuanmin Hu & Yuzhong Zhang & Songhan Wang, 2023. "Global declines of offshore gas flaring inadequate to meet the 2030 goal," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 1095-1102, September.
    2. Malak Anshassi & Timothy G. Townsend, 2023. "The hidden economic and environmental costs of eliminating kerb-side recycling," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(8), pages 919-928, August.
    3. Esparza, Ángel E. & Rowan, Gillian & Newhook, Ashley & Deglint, Hanford J. & Garrison, Billy & Orth-Lashley, Bryn & Girard, Marianne & Shaw, Warren, 2023. "Analysis of a tiered top-down approach using satellite and aircraft platforms to monitor oil and gas facilities in the Permian basin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Mark Omara & Daniel Zavala-Araiza & David R. Lyon & Benjamin Hmiel & Katherine A. Roberts & Steven P. Hamburg, 2022. "Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:575:y:2019:i:7781:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1720-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.