IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v167y2022ics1364032122006037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of fuel ethanol production via bio-oil fermentation based on a centralized-distribution model

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Ji-Lu
  • Zhu, Ya-Hong
  • Su, Hong-Yu
  • Sun, Guo-Tao
  • Kang, Fu-Ren
  • Zhu, Ming-Qiang

Abstract

Fuel ethanol from biomass resources has been gaining attention. Fuel ethanol production via a regional bio-oil production and a central bio-oil direct or indirect fermentation appears interesting and innovative. Techno-economic-environmental analysis is used to evaluate the economic feasibility and environmental impacts of this production process at the industrial scale. The rigorous process models for the fuel ethanol production via bio-oil fermentation are developed using R software. The internal rates of return and the minimum selling price are estimated based on techno-economic analysis; global warming potential 100a, cumulative energy demand, and eco-indicator 99 methods are used using three allocation methods based on life cycle assessment. A sensitivity analysis and an uncertain analysis of the techno-economic-environmental indicators are also conducted. For the direct and indirect fermentation pathway, the internal rates of return is separately 25.6% and 41.5%, and the minimum selling price is $218/metric ton ethanol ($0.98/gge) and $264/metric ton ethanol ($1.19/gge), respectively. According to economic value-based allocation methods, the life cycle assessment indicates the global warming potential (GWP100a) of the production of 1 kg of ethanol via the bio-oil direct fermentation pathway and the bio-oil indirect fermentation pathway is 0.729 kg CO2-eq/kg ethanol and 0.718 CO2-eq/kg ethanol, respectively. The calculation and analysis results show that fuel ethanol production by the indirect bio-oil fermentation pathway is more economically feasible and environmentally friendly and could be attractive to capital markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Ji-Lu & Zhu, Ya-Hong & Su, Hong-Yu & Sun, Guo-Tao & Kang, Fu-Ren & Zhu, Ming-Qiang, 2022. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of fuel ethanol production via bio-oil fermentation based on a centralized-distribution model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:167:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122006037
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122006037
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chovau, Simon & Degrauwe, David & Van der Bruggen, Bart, 2013. "Critical analysis of techno-economic estimates for the production cost of lignocellulosic bio-ethanol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 307-321.
    2. Jiang, Li-Qun & Fang, Zhen & Zhao, Zeng-Li & Zheng, An-Qing & Wang, Xiao-Bo & Li, Hai-Bin, 2019. "Levoglucosan and its hydrolysates via fast pyrolysis of lignocellulose for microbial biofuels: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 215-229.
    3. Mupondwa, Edmund & Li, Xue & Tabil, Lope & Sokhansanj, Shahab & Adapa, Phani, 2017. "Status of Canada's lignocellulosic ethanol: Part I: Pretreatment technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 178-190.
    4. Ardolino, F. & Cardamone, G.F. & Parrillo, F. & Arena, U., 2021. "Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. González-García, Sara & Moreira, M. Teresa & Feijoo, Gumersindo, 2010. "Comparative environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol from different feedstocks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 2077-2085, September.
    6. Taylor-de-Lima, Reynaldo L.N. & Gerbasi da Silva, Arthur José & Legey, Luiz F.L. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2018. "Evaluation of economic feasibility under uncertainty of a thermochemical route for ethanol production in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 363-376.
    7. Zheng, Ji-Lu & Zhu, Ya-Hong & Zhu, Ming-Qiang & Wu, Hai-Tang & Sun, Run-Cang, 2018. "Bio-oil gasification using air - Steam as gasifying agents in an entrained flow gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 426-435.
    8. Fakayode, Olugbenga Abiola & Akpabli-Tsigbe, Nelson Dzidzorgbe Kwaku & Wahia, Hafida & Tu, Shanshan & Ren, Manni & Zhou, Cunshan & Ma, Haile, 2021. "Integrated bioprocess for bio-ethanol production from watermelon rind biomass: Ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvent pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 258-270.
    9. Kumar, R. & Strezov, V., 2021. "Thermochemical production of bio-oil: A review of downstream processing technologies for bio-oil upgrading, production of hydrogen and high value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Hu, Xun & Gholizadeh, Mortaza, 2020. "Progress of the applications of bio-oil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Li, Qi & Hu, Guiping, 2014. "Supply chain design under uncertainty for advanced biofuel production based on bio-oil gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 576-584.
    12. Wu, Bo & Wang, Yan-Wei & Dai, Yong-Hua & Song, Chao & Zhu, Qi-Li & Qin, Han & Tan, Fu-Rong & Chen, Han-Cheng & Dai, Li-Chun & Hu, Guo-Quan & He, Ming-Xiong, 2021. "Current status and future prospective of bio-ethanol industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Mupondwa, Edmund & Li, Xue & Tabil, Lope & Sokhansanj, Shahab & Adapa, Phani, 2017. "Status of Canada's lignocellulosic ethanol: Part II: Hydrolysis and fermentation technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1535-1555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Qipeng & Zhao, Liang, 2023. "Data-driven stochastic robust optimization of sustainable utility system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Baral, Nawa Raj & Mishra, Shruti K. & George, Anthe & Gautam, Sagar & Mishra, Umakant & Scown, Corinne D., 2022. "Multifunctional landscapes for dedicated bioenergy crops lead to low-carbon market-competitive biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Ji-Lu & Zhu, Ya-Hong & Dong, Yan-Yan & Zhu, Ming-Qiang, 2023. "Life cycle water consumption of bio-oil fermentation for bio-ethanol production based on a distributed-centralized model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Lauermann, Carlos H. & Hayashi, Thamy C. & Mariños, Diego J. & Rodrigues da Costa, Roberto Berlini & Coronado, Christian J.R. & Roberts, Justo J. & de Carvalho, João A., 2022. "Ethanol as a renewable biofuel: Combustion characteristics and application in engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Daylan, B. & Ciliz, N., 2016. "Life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing analysis of lignocellulosic bioethanol as an alternative transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 578-587.
    4. Li, Xue & Mupondwa, Edmund, 2021. "Empirical analysis of large-scale bio-succinic acid commercialization from a technoeconomic and innovation value chain perspective: BioAmber biorefinery case study in Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Guo, Tianyu & Yu, Yan & Wan, Zhangmin & Zargar, Shiva & Wu, Jie & Bi, Ran & Sokhansanj, Shahabaddine & Tu, Qingshi & Rojas, Orlando J., 2022. "Energy pellets from whole-wheat straw processed with a deep eutectic solvent: A comprehensive thermal, molecular and environmental evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 902-911.
    7. Rocha-Meneses, Lisandra & Raud, Merlin & Orupõld, Kaja & Kikas, Timo, 2019. "Potential of bioethanol production waste for methane recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 133-139.
    8. Radhakumari, Muktham & Taha, Mohamed & Shahsavari, Esmaeil & Bhargava, Suresh K. & Satyavathi, Bankupalli & Ball, Andrew S., 2017. "Pongamia pinnata seed residue – A low cost inedible resource for on-site/in-house lignocellulases and sustainable ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 682-687.
    9. Zhong, Hanbin & Xiong, Qingang & Yin, Lina & Zhang, Juntao & Zhu, Yuqin & Liang, Shengrong & Niu, Ben & Zhang, Xinyu, 2020. "CFD-based reduced-order modeling of fluidized-bed biomass fast pyrolysis using artificial neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 613-626.
    10. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Motevali, Ali & Ghobadian, Barat, 2019. "Ethanol production from date wastes: Adapted technologies, challenges, and global potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1094-1110.
    11. Johannes Full & Silja Hohmann & Sonja Ziehn & Edgar Gamero & Tobias Schließ & Hans-Peter Schmid & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2023. "Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    13. Hu, Hangli & Luo, Yanru & Zou, Jianfeng & Zhang, Shukai & Yellezuome, Dominic & Rahman, Md Maksudur & Li, Yingkai & Li, Chong & Cai, Junmeng, 2022. "Exploring aging kinetic mechanisms of bio-oil from biomass pyrolysis based on change in carbonyl content," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 782-790.
    14. Benim, Ali Cemal & Pfeiffelmann, Björn & Ocłoń, Paweł & Taler, Jan, 2019. "Computational investigation of a lifted hydrogen flame with LES and FGM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1172-1181.
    15. Tahereh Soleymani Angili & Katarzyna Grzesik & Anne Rödl & Martin Kaltschmitt, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Bioethanol Production: A Review of Feedstock, Technology and Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Alessia Amato & Konstantina Tsigkou & Alessandro Becci & Francesca Beolchini & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Francesco Ferella, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane vs. Fossil Methane Production and Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Ribeiro, Barbara E. & Quintanilla, Miguel A., 2015. "Transitions in biofuel technologies: An appraisal of the social impacts of cellulosic ethanol using the Delphi method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 53-68.
    18. Alberto Benato & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alarico Macor, 2022. "Possible Ways of Extending the Biogas Plants Lifespan after the Feed-In Tariff Expiration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Singh, Piyush Pratap & Jaswal, Anurag & Nirmalkar, Neelkanth & Mondal, Tarak, 2023. "Synergistic effect of transition metals substitution on the catalytic activity of LaNi0.5M0.5O3 (M = Co, Cu, and Fe) perovskite catalyst for steam reforming of simulated bio-oil for green hydrogen pro," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 575-587.
    20. Liu, Shasha & Wu, Gang & Gao, Yi & Li, Bin & Feng, Yu & Zhou, Jianbin & Hu, Xun & Huang, Yong & Zhang, Shu & Zhang, Hong, 2021. "Understanding the catalytic upgrading of bio-oil from pine pyrolysis over CO2-activated biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 538-546.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:167:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122006037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.