IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v247y2025ics0960148125005890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating bias correction methods for wind power estimation using numerical meteorological models

Author

Listed:
  • Maciel-Tiburcio, A.
  • Martínez-Alvarado, O.
  • Rodríguez-Hernández, O.

Abstract

Enhancing our understanding of the meteorological factors influencing renewable energy is crucial in the energy transition, as inherent biases in widely used meteorological numerical models reduce their reliability in accurately simulating essential variables for electricity modeling. This study examines five bias correction methods for estimating wind power capacity factors, utilizing ERA5 reanalysis, Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) simulations, and experimental data from multiple anemometric towers. Areas influenced by large-scale effects, such as the interaction between large-scale atmospheric circulation and orography, were accurately reproduced; however, regions with complex terrain exhibited larger errors. In some cases, the constraints imposed by large-scale features on near-surface winds are strong enough to make bias correction unnecessary. The Weibull quantile mapping and the quantile percentile method produced the lowest errors, however the latter preserved bi-modality. The mean state, linear scale, and quantile mapping Rayleigh methods produced the highest errors in 72% of the cases examined. Analysis of ERA5 revealed the dependence of its ability to reproduce the capacity factors on the conditions around the site. Bias correction alters the probability distribution’s shape, significantly impacting CF estimates through its interaction with the power curve.

Suggested Citation

  • Maciel-Tiburcio, A. & Martínez-Alvarado, O. & Rodríguez-Hernández, O., 2025. "Evaluating bias correction methods for wind power estimation using numerical meteorological models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:247:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125005890
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.122927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125005890
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gruber, Katharina & Regner, Peter & Wehrle, Sebastian & Zeyringer, Marianne & Schmidt, Johannes, 2022. "Towards global validation of wind power simulations: A multi-country assessment of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the global wind atlas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Vu Dinh, Quang & Doan, Quang-Van & Ngo-Duc, Thanh & Nguyen Dinh, Van & Dinh Duc, Nguyen, 2022. "Offshore wind resource in the context of global climate change over a tropical area," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    3. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2016. "Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1224-1239.
    4. Gruber, Katharina & Klöckl, Claude & Regner, Peter & Baumgartner, Johann & Schmidt, Johannes, 2019. "Assessing the Global Wind Atlas and local measurements for bias correction of wind power generation simulated from MERRA-2 in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Draxl, Caroline & Clifton, Andrew & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & McCaa, Jim, 2015. "The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 355-366.
    6. Olauson, Jon, 2018. "ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 322-331.
    7. Chen, Shu-Hua & Yang, Shu-Chih & Chen, Chih-Ying & van Dam, C.P. & Cooperman, Aubryn & Shiu, Henry & MacDonald, Clinton & Zack, John, 2019. "Application of bias corrections to improve hub-height ensemble wind forecasts over the Tehachapi Wind Resource Area," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 281-291.
    8. Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Carvalho, D. & Arguilé-Pérez, B. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2022. "Combining offshore wind and solar photovoltaic energy to stabilize energy supply under climate change scenarios: A case study on the western Iberian Peninsula," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Henckes, Philipp & Knaut, Andreas & Obermüller, Frank & Frank, Christopher, 2018. "The benefit of long-term high resolution wind data for electricity system analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 934-942.
    11. Costoya, X. & Rocha, A. & Carvalho, D., 2020. "Using bias-correction to improve future projections of offshore wind energy resource: A case study on the Iberian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James M. Wilczak & Elena Akish & Antonietta Capotondi & Gilbert P. Compo, 2024. "Evaluation and Bias Correction of the ERA5 Reanalysis over the United States for Wind and Solar Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-36, March.
    2. Houndekindo, Freddy & Ouarda, Taha B.M.J., 2025. "LSTM and Transformer-based framework for bias correction of ERA5 hourly wind speeds," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Simon, Emanuel & Schaeffer, Roberto & Szklo, Alexandre, 2025. "A solar and wind clustering framework with downscaling and bias correction of reanalysis data using singular value decomposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    5. José Rafael Dorrego Portela & Geovanni Hernández Galvez & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Ricardo Saldaña Flores & Omar Sarracino Martínez & Orlando Lastres Danguillecourt & Pascual López de Paz & A, 2022. "Microscale Wind Assessment, Comparing Mesoscale Information and Observed Wind Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Pflugfelder, Yannik & Kramer, Hendrik & Weber, Christoph, 2024. "A novel approach to generate bias-corrected regional wind infeed timeseries based on reanalysis data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    7. deCastro, M. & Rusu, L. & Arguilé-Pérez, B. & Ribeiro, A. & Costoya, X. & Carvalho, D. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2024. "Different approaches to analyze the impact of future climate change on the exploitation of wave energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Reinhold Lehneis & Daniela Thrän, 2023. "Temporally and Spatially Resolved Simulation of the Wind Power Generation in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Guanying Chen & Zhenming Ji, 2024. "A Review of Solar and Wind Energy Resource Projection Based on the Earth System Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Zhang, Juntao & Cheng, Chuntian & Yu, Shen, 2024. "Recognizing the mapping relationship between wind power output and meteorological information at a province level by coupling GIS and CNN technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    11. de Aquino Ferreira, Saulo Custodio & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & Maçaira, Paula Medina, 2022. "Validation of the representativeness of wind speed time series obtained from reanalysis data for Brazilian territory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    12. Katikas, Loukas & Dimitriadis, Panayiotis & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris & Kontos, Themistoklis & Kyriakidis, Phaedon, 2021. "A stochastic simulation scheme for the long-term persistence, heavy-tailed and double periodic behavior of observational and reanalysis wind time-series," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    13. Murcia, Juan Pablo & Koivisto, Matti Juhani & Luzia, Graziela & Olsen, Bjarke T. & Hahmann, Andrea N. & Sørensen, Poul Ejnar & Als, Magnus, 2022. "Validation of European-scale simulated wind speed and wind generation time series," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    14. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    15. Gruber, Katharina & Regner, Peter & Wehrle, Sebastian & Zeyringer, Marianne & Schmidt, Johannes, 2022. "Towards global validation of wind power simulations: A multi-country assessment of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the global wind atlas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    16. Houndekindo, Freddy & Ouarda, Taha B.M.J., 2024. "Prediction of hourly wind speed time series at unsampled locations using machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    17. Emily Cowin & Changlong Wang & Stuart D. C. Walsh, 2023. "Assessing Predictions of Australian Offshore Wind Energy Resources from Reanalysis Datasets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Kena Likassa Nefabas & Lennart Söder & Mengesha Mamo & Jon Olauson, 2021. "Modeling of Ethiopian Wind Power Production Using ERA5 Reanalysis Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Zhang, Shuangyi & Li, Xichen, 2021. "Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Vu Dinh, Quang & Doan, Quang-Van & Ngo-Duc, Thanh & Nguyen Dinh, Van & Dinh Duc, Nguyen, 2022. "Offshore wind resource in the context of global climate change over a tropical area," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:247:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125005890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.