IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v295y2021ics0306261921003627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic simulation scheme for the long-term persistence, heavy-tailed and double periodic behavior of observational and reanalysis wind time-series

Author

Listed:
  • Katikas, Loukas
  • Dimitriadis, Panayiotis
  • Koutsoyiannis, Demetris
  • Kontos, Themistoklis
  • Kyriakidis, Phaedon

Abstract

Lacking coastal and offshore wind speed time series of sufficient length, reanalysis data and wind speed models serve as the primary sources of valuable information for wind power management. In this study, long-length observational records and modelled data from Uncertainties in Ensembles of Regional Re-Analyses system are collected, analyzed and modelled. The first stage refers to the statistical analysis of the time series marginal structure in terms of the fitting accuracy, the distributions’ tails behavior, extremes response and the power output errors, using Weibull distribution and three parameter Weibull-related distributions (Burr Type III and XII, Generalized Gamma). In the second stage, the co-located samples in time and space are compared in order to investigate the reanalysis data performance. In the last stage, the stochastic generation mathematical framework is applied based on a Generalized Hurst-Kolmogorov process embedded in a Symmetric-Moving-Average scheme, which is used for the simulation of a wind process while preserving explicitly the marginal moments, wind’s intermittency and long-term persistence. Results indicate that Burr and Generalized Gamma distribution could be successfully used for wind resource assessment, although, the latter emerged enhanced performance in most of the statistical tests. Moreover, the credibility of the reanalysis data is questionable due to increased bias and root mean squared errors, however, high-order statistics along with the long-term persistence are thoroughly preserved. Eventually, the simplicity and the flexibility of the stochastic generation scheme to reproduce the seasonal and diurnal wind characteristics by preserving the long-term dependence structure are highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Katikas, Loukas & Dimitriadis, Panayiotis & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris & Kontos, Themistoklis & Kyriakidis, Phaedon, 2021. "A stochastic simulation scheme for the long-term persistence, heavy-tailed and double periodic behavior of observational and reanalysis wind time-series," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:295:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921003627
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921003627
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianxing Yu & Yiqin Fu & Yang Yu & Shibo Wu & Yuanda Wu & Minjie You & Shuai Guo & Mu Li, 2019. "Assessment of Offshore Wind Characteristics and Wind Energy Potential in Bohai Bay, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena, 2013. "A methodology for the synthetic generation of hourly wind speed time series based on some known aggregate input data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 541-550.
    3. Kiche J & Oscar Ngesa & George Orwa, 2019. "On Generalized Gamma Distribution and Its Application to Survival Data," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 85-102, September.
    4. Christoffer Hallgren & Johan Arnqvist & Stefan Ivanell & Heiner Körnich & Ville Vakkari & Erik Sahlée, 2020. "Looking for an Offshore Low-Level Jet Champion among Recent Reanalyses: A Tight Race over the Baltic Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Kotroni, V. & Lagouvardos, K. & Lykoudis, S., 2014. "High-resolution model-based wind atlas for Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 479-489.
    6. Lo Brano, Valerio & Orioli, Aldo & Ciulla, Giuseppina & Culotta, Simona, 2011. "Quality of wind speed fitting distributions for the urban area of Palermo, Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1026-1039.
    7. Zárate-Miñano, Rafael & Anghel, Marian & Milano, Federico, 2013. "Continuous wind speed models based on stochastic differential equations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 42-49.
    8. Scholz, Teresa & Lopes, Vitor V. & Estanqueiro, Ana, 2014. "A cyclic time-dependent Markov process to model daily patterns in wind turbine power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 557-568.
    9. Ephrath, J. E. & Goudriaan, J. & Marani, A., 1996. "Modelling diurnal patterns of air temperature, radiation wind speed and relative humidity by equations from daily characteristics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 377-393, August.
    10. Soukissian, Takvor H. & Papadopoulos, Anastasios, 2015. "Effects of different wind data sources in offshore wind power assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 101-114.
    11. Aksoy, Hafzullah & Fuat Toprak, Z & Aytek, Ali & Erdem Ünal, N, 2004. "Stochastic generation of hourly mean wind speed data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(14), pages 2111-2131.
    12. Hu, Qinghua & Wang, Yun & Xie, Zongxia & Zhu, Pengfei & Yu, Daren, 2016. "On estimating uncertainty of wind energy with mixture of distributions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 935-962.
    13. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2016. "Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1224-1239.
    14. Gruber, Katharina & Klöckl, Claude & Regner, Peter & Baumgartner, Johann & Schmidt, Johannes, 2019. "Assessing the Global Wind Atlas and local measurements for bias correction of wind power generation simulated from MERRA-2 in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Giannaros, Theodore M. & Melas, Dimitrios & Ziomas, Ioannis, 2017. "Performance evaluation of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for assessing wind resource in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 190-198.
    16. Wang, Yi-Hui & Walter, Ryan K. & White, Crow & Farr, Hayley & Ruttenberg, Benjamin I., 2019. "Assessment of surface wind datasets for estimating offshore wind energy along the Central California Coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 343-353.
    17. Olauson, Jon, 2018. "ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 322-331.
    18. Shu, Z.R. & Li, Q.S. & Chan, P.W., 2015. "Investigation of offshore wind energy potential in Hong Kong based on Weibull distribution function," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 362-373.
    19. Campisi-Pinto, Salvatore & Gianchandani, Kaushal & Ashkenazy, Yosef, 2020. "Statistical tests for the distribution of surface wind and current speeds across the globe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 861-876.
    20. Carta, J.A. & Ramírez, P. & Velázquez, S., 2009. "A review of wind speed probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the Canary Islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 933-955, June.
    21. Rose, Stephen & Apt, Jay, 2016. "Quantifying sources of uncertainty in reanalysis derived wind speed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 157-165.
    22. Steven Knoop & Pooja Ramakrishnan & Ine Wijnant, 2020. "Dutch Offshore Wind Atlas Validation against Cabauw Meteomast Wind Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    23. Suomalainen, K. & Silva, C.A. & Ferrão, P. & Connors, S., 2012. "Synthetic wind speed scenarios including diurnal effects: Implications for wind power dimensioning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 41-50.
    24. Loukatou, Angeliki & Howell, Sydney & Johnson, Paul & Duck, Peter, 2018. "Stochastic wind speed modelling for estimation of expected wind power output," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1328-1340.
    25. Birgir Hrafnkelsson & Gudmundur V. Oddsson & Runar Unnthorsson, 2016. "A Method for Estimating Annual Energy Production Using Monte Carlo Wind Speed Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    26. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2014. "Offshore wind energy resource simulation forced by different reanalyses: Comparison with observed data in the Iberian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 57-64.
    27. Soukissian, Takvor, 2013. "Use of multi-parameter distributions for offshore wind speed modeling: The Johnson SB distribution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 982-1000.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bai, Mingliang & Yang, Xusheng & Liu, Jinfu & Liu, Jiao & Yu, Daren, 2021. "Convolutional neural network-based deep transfer learning for fault detection of gas turbine combustion chambers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    2. Renata Rojas Guerra & Fernando A. Peña-Ramírez & Gauss M. Cordeiro, 2023. "The Logistic Burr XII Distribution: Properties and Applications to Income Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Lins, Davi Ribeiro & Guedes, Kevin Santos & Pitombeira-Neto, Anselmo Ramalho & Rocha, Paulo Alexandre Costa & de Andrade, Carla Freitas, 2023. "Comparison of the performance of different wind speed distribution models applied to onshore and offshore wind speed data in the Northeast Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    4. Sakki, G.K. & Tsoukalas, I. & Kossieris, P. & Makropoulos, C. & Efstratiadis, A., 2022. "Stochastic simulation-optimization framework for the design and assessment of renewable energy systems under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2023. "Introducing a new wind speed complementarity model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Athanasios Zisos & Georgia-Konstantina Sakki & Andreas Efstratiadis, 2023. "Mixing Renewable Energy with Pumped Hydropower Storage: Design Optimization under Uncertainty and Other Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Deep, Sneh & Sarkar, Arnab & Ghawat, Mayur & Rajak, Manoj Kumar, 2020. "Estimation of the wind energy potential for coastal locations in India using the Weibull model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 319-339.
    3. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    4. Mazzeo, Domenico & Oliveti, Giuseppe & Labonia, Ester, 2018. "Estimation of wind speed probability density function using a mixture of two truncated normal distributions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1260-1280.
    5. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2019. "Wind speed distribution selection – A review of recent development and progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Wang, Jianzhou & Huang, Xiaojia & Li, Qiwei & Ma, Xuejiao, 2018. "Comparison of seven methods for determining the optimal statistical distribution parameters: A case study of wind energy assessment in the large-scale wind farms of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 432-448.
    8. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2017. "Offshore winds and wind energy production estimates derived from ASCAT, OSCAT, numerical weather prediction models and buoys – A comparative study for the Iberian Peninsula Atlantic coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 433-444.
    9. Ma, Jinrui & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2018. "Flexible wind speed generation model: Markov chain with an embedded diffusion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 316-328.
    10. Rabbani, R. & Zeeshan, M., 2020. "Exploring the suitability of MERRA-2 reanalysis data for wind energy estimation, analysis of wind characteristics and energy potential assessment for selected sites in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1240-1251.
    11. Guedes, Kevin S. & de Andrade, Carla F. & Rocha, Paulo A.C. & Mangueira, Rivanilso dos S. & de Moura, Elineudo P., 2020. "Performance analysis of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in estimating the parameters of several wind speed distributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Kantar, Yeliz Mert & Usta, Ilhan & Arik, Ibrahim & Yenilmez, Ismail, 2018. "Wind speed analysis using the Extended Generalized Lindley Distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1024-1030.
    13. Gruber, Katharina & Regner, Peter & Wehrle, Sebastian & Zeyringer, Marianne & Schmidt, Johannes, 2022. "Towards global validation of wind power simulations: A multi-country assessment of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the global wind atlas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    14. Han, Qinkai & Hao, Zhuolin & Hu, Tao & Chu, Fulei, 2018. "Non-parametric models for joint probabilistic distributions of wind speed and direction data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1032-1042.
    15. Soukissian, Takvor H. & Karathanasi, Flora E., 2017. "On the selection of bivariate parametric models for wind data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 280-304.
    16. Rebecca J. Barthelmie & Kaitlyn E. Dantuono & Emma J. Renner & Frederick L. Letson & Sara C. Pryor, 2021. "Extreme Wind and Waves in U.S. East Coast Offshore Wind Energy Lease Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Alrashidi, Musaed & Rahman, Saifur & Pipattanasomporn, Manisa, 2020. "Metaheuristic optimization algorithms to estimate statistical distribution parameters for characterizing wind speeds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 664-681.
    18. de Aquino Ferreira, Saulo Custodio & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & Maçaira, Paula Medina, 2022. "Validation of the representativeness of wind speed time series obtained from reanalysis data for Brazilian territory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Liu, Fa & Wang, Xunming & Sun, Fubao & Kleidon, Axel, 2023. "Potential impact of global stilling on wind energy production in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    20. Arenas-López, J. Pablo & Badaoui, Mohamed, 2020. "Stochastic modelling of wind speeds based on turbulence intensity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 10-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:295:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921003627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.