IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v255y2025ics0951832024007154.html

Bayesian structural reliability updating using a population track record

Author

Listed:
  • de Vries, R.
  • Steenbergen, R.D.J.M.
  • Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M.

Abstract

In the assessment of existing structures, it is uncommon to consider a track record of the structural performance of the structure itself or similar structures. However, the structure's proven strength in service could play a significant role, along with the performance of similar structures in the population. Because the population track record does not apply in the design of new structures, it is not encountered in design standards. An assessment that does not incorporate the track record may conclude insufficient structural reliability whilst, in reality, the reliability is satisfactory. In the suggested approach, information obtained from laboratory experiments is combined with the track record in a Bayesian way to assess a structure's reliability. As a case study for this article, the reliability of the connection strength between wide slab floor elements is considered. Although laboratory tests indicate poor connection strength, the track record indicates just one failure and many well-performing floors. It is found that considering the time-dependent nature of structural reliability is vital for understanding how proven strength develops from the completion of the structure to its usage today. The number of similar objects in the population that show satisfactory performance is varied and is shown to have a significant effect when its number grows. The presented method and case study show that reliability assessments incorporating a track record enable more accurate structural reliability predictions for existing structures.

Suggested Citation

  • de Vries, R. & Steenbergen, R.D.J.M. & Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M., 2025. "Bayesian structural reliability updating using a population track record," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:255:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024007154
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024007154
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kloek, Tuen & van Dijk, Herman K, 1978. "Bayesian Estimates of Equation System Parameters: An Application of Integration by Monte Carlo," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3222 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Yao & Taotao Cheng & Jiao Luo & Xintian Liu, 2026. "Weibull distribution-based reliability evaluation of cutting tool via improved Bayesian-Bootstrap method," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 240(1), pages 185-199, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Palm, F.C. & Sneek, J.M., 1981. "Some econometric applications of the exact distribution of the ratio of two quadratic forms in normal variates," Serie Research Memoranda 0018, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. James A. Chalfant & Richard S. Gray & Kenneth J. White, 1991. "Evaluating Prior Beliefs in a Demand System: The Case of Meat Demand in Canada," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(2), pages 476-490.
    3. Cranfield, John A.L. & Preckel, Paul V. & Liu, Songquan, 1997. "Approximating Bayesian Posteriors using Multivariate Gaussian Quadrature," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35791, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Ardia, David & Hoogerheide, Lennart F., 2010. "Efficient Bayesian estimation and combination of GARCH-type models," MPRA Paper 22919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Koopman, Siem Jan & Lucas, André, 2008. "A Non-Gaussian Panel Time Series Model for Estimating and Decomposing Default Risk," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 510-525.
    6. Shigeru Iwata & Evan Tanner, 2007. "Pick Your Poison: The Exchange Rate Regime and Capital Account Volatility in Emerging Markets," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 57(7-8), pages 363-381, September.
    7. Babula, Ronald A. & Bessler, David A. & Schluter, Gerald E., 1990. "Poultry-Related Price Transmissions and Structural Change Since the 1950's," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 42(02), pages 1-9.
    8. Unknown, 2006. "Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Volume 2, Number 2, Fall 2006," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 2(2).
    9. Michael A. Kouritzin, 2025. "Markov Observation Models and Deepfakes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Enders, Walter & Lee, Bong-Soo, 1997. "Accounting for real and nominal exchange rate movements in the post-Bretton Woods period," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 233-254, April.
    11. VAN DIJK, Herman K., 1987. "Some advances in Bayesian estimations methods using Monte Carlo Integration," LIDAM Reprints CORE 783, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    12. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    13. Hajivassiliou, Vassilis A. & Ruud, Paul A., 1986. "Classical estimation methods for LDV models using simulation," Handbook of Econometrics, in: R. F. Engle & D. McFadden (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 40, pages 2383-2441, Elsevier.
    14. Feliz, Raúl Aníbal & Vargas, Laura, 1994. "Una prueba econométrica del enfoque moderno de la cuenta corriente en México," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 9(2), pages 189-207.
    15. Lennart F. Hoogerheide & Johan F. Kaashoek, 2004. "Functional Approximations to Likelihoods/Posterior Densities: A Neural Network Approach to Efficient Sampling," Computing in Economics and Finance 2004 74, Society for Computational Economics.
    16. G. Christodoulakis & E. Mamatzakis, 2010. "Return attribution analysis of the UK insurance portfolios," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 405-420, July.
    17. Bauwens, L. & Dijk, H. K., 1989. "Bayesian Limited Information Analysis Revisited," Econometric Institute Archives 272386, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Fok, Dennis & Franses, Philip Hans, 2007. "Modeling the diffusion of scientific publications," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 376-390, August.
    19. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & John Maheu & Didier Nibbering & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2023. "Bayesian Forecasting in the 21st Century: A Modern Review," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 1/23, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:255:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024007154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.