IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v242y2024ics095183202300652x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demarcation method of safety separations for sUAV based on collision risk estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhong, Gang
  • Du, Sen
  • Zhang, Honghai
  • Zhou, Jiangying
  • Liu, Hao

Abstract

Maintaining safe separations is essential to achieve reliable operations for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Given the escalating severity of collision risks associated with UAVs, separation criteria have emerged as foundational to both airspace design and collision avoidance strategies. However, without adequate consideration of the characteristics of small-UAV (sUAV) encounters and airspace structure, most of the existing models focus on assessing uniform separation volume with manned aircraft. This paper proposes a demarcation method of safety separation for sUAVs based on collision risk estimation. Firstly, five collision zones are developed for collision determination by considering the shape characteristics. Then, the collision risk model is established from the 3-D probability density function (PDF) with the supremum of total system error (TSE). Finally, the minimum safe separations for different encountering scenarios are demarcated by setting the threshold of risk. Simulation results testify that the selection of the collision zones and crossing angles affect the collision risk apparently. The results also demonstrate the effectiveness of separation criteria demarcated by ‘Equivalent Level of Safety’ (ELoS). Statistical analysis for 100 sampled environments shows the reliability of the proposed method, which captured the characteristics of sUAVs and could be utilized for elaborative separation framework in structured low-altitude airspace.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhong, Gang & Du, Sen & Zhang, Honghai & Zhou, Jiangying & Liu, Hao, 2024. "Demarcation method of safety separations for sUAV based on collision risk estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s095183202300652x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202300652X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei Yang & Wenbo Li & Simin Wang & Zheng Zhao, 2021. "Multi-Attributes Decision-Making for CDO Trajectory Planning in a Novel Terminal Airspace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Subramanian, Abhinav & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2022. "Importance sampling for probabilistic prognosis of sector-wide flight separation safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Blom, Henk A.P. & Jiang, Chenpeng & Grimme, Wouter B.A. & Mitici, Mihaela & Cheung, Yuk S., 2021. "Third party risk modelling of Unmanned Aircraft System operations, with application to parcel delivery service," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    4. Pang, Bizhao & Hu, Xinting & Dai, Wei & Low, Kin Huat, 2022. "UAV path optimization with an integrated cost assessment model considering third-party risks in metropolitan environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Cohen, Adam P & Shaheen, Susan A PhD & Farrar, Emily M, 2021. "Urban Air Mobility: History, Ecosystem, Market Potential, and Challenges," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8nh0s83q, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Liu, Lujie & Yang, Jun, 2023. "A dynamic mission abort policy for the swarm executing missions and its solution method by tailored deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Waheed Siddiqee, 1973. "A Mathematical Model for Predicting the Number of Potential Conflict Situations at Intersecting Air Routes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 158-167, May.
    8. Zhang, Yimin & Shortle, John & Sherry, Lance, 2015. "Methodology for collision risk assessment of an airspace flow corridor concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 444-455.
    9. Zou, Yiyuan & Zhang, Honghai & Zhong, Gang & Liu, Hao & Feng, Dikun, 2021. "Collision probability estimation for small unmanned aircraft systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dai, Wei & Quek, Zhi Hao & Low, Kin Huat, 2024. "Probabilistic modeling and reasoning of conflict detection effectiveness by tracking systems towards safe urban air mobility operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Wu, Pengcheng & Chen, Jun, 2024. "Data-driven zonotopic approximation for n-dimensional probabilistic geofencing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    3. Pang, Bizhao & Hu, Xinting & Dai, Wei & Low, Kin Huat, 2022. "UAV path optimization with an integrated cost assessment model considering third-party risks in metropolitan environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Liu, Tao & Bai, Guanghan & Tao, Junyong & Zhang, Yun-An & Fang, Yining, 2024. "A Multistate Network Approach for Resilience Analysis of UAV Swarm considering Information Exchange Capacity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Zhao, Xian & Wang, Xinlei & Dai, Ying & Qiu, Qingan, 2024. "Joint optimization of loading, mission abort and rescue site selection policies for UAV," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Ljubica Radovanović, 2024. "Assessing Strategies to Overcome Barriers for Drone Usage in Last-Mile Logistics: A Novel Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Fang, Chen & Chen, Jianhui & Qiu, Daizhen, 2024. "Reliability modeling for balanced systems considering mission abort policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Dui, Hongyan & Lu, Yaohui & Chen, Liwei, 2024. "Importance-based system cost management and failure risk analysis for different phases in life cycle," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Ariza-Montes, Antonio & Quan, Wei & Radic, Aleksandar & Koo, Bonhak & Kim, Jinkyung Jenny & Chua, Bee-Lia & Han, Heesup, 2023. "Understanding the behavioral intention to use urban air autonomous vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Chiara Caterina Ditta & Maria Nadia Postorino, 2023. "Three-Dimensional Urban Air Networks for Future Urban Air Transport Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Meng, Sa & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2024. "Optimizing component activation and operation aborting in missions with consecutive attempts and common abort command," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    12. Honghai Zhang & Yuhan Fei & Jingyu Li & Bowen Li & Hao Liu, 2022. "Method of Vertiport Capacity Assessment Based on Queuing Theory of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Jaeho Yoo & Yunseon Choe & Soo-i Rim, 2022. "Risk Perceptions Using Urban and Advanced Air Mobility (UAM/AAM) by Applying a Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam & Broader, Jacquelyn, 2022. "Shared Mobility in Low- and High-Income Regions," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8kt9q81w, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Mingkai Wang & Saulo O. D. Luiz & Shuguang Zhang & Antonio M. N. Lima, 2023. "Electric Flight in Extreme and Uncertain Urban Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Friedman, Moshe F., 1986. "On the properties of the sum of durations of perceived conflicts in air traffic control," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 317-324.
    17. Rohit Goyal & Colleen Reiche & Chris Fernando & Adam Cohen, 2021. "Advanced Air Mobility: Demand Analysis and Market Potential of the Airport Shuttle and Air Taxi Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Bridgelall, Raj & Askarzadeh, Taraneh & Tolliver, Denver D., 2023. "Introducing an efficiency index to evaluate eVTOL designs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Pan-Yang Su & Chinmay Maheshwari & Victoria Tuck & Shankar Sastry, 2024. "Incentive-Compatible Vertiport Reservation in Advanced Air Mobility: An Auction-Based Approach," Papers 2403.18166, arXiv.org.
    20. Pons-Prats, Jordi & Živojinović, Tanja & Kuljanin, Jovana, 2022. "On the understanding of the current status of urban air mobility development and its future prospects: Commuting in a flying vehicle as a new paradigm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s095183202300652x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.