IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v244y2024ics0951832023008220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic modeling and reasoning of conflict detection effectiveness by tracking systems towards safe urban air mobility operations

Author

Listed:
  • Dai, Wei
  • Quek, Zhi Hao
  • Low, Kin Huat

Abstract

This study targets the scenario where centralized tracking systems provide tactical conflict detection for urban air mobility (UAM) flights. In this scenario, the interaction between airspace design and tracking system performances, and its impact on the effectiveness of conflict detection have not been addressed in the literature. To overcome this gap, this study aims at achieving probabilistic modeling and reasoning analysis, to provide references for stakeholders in the design of urban airspace and the deployment of flight tracking systems. A framework integrating multiple probabilistic methods is established. We formulate the event tree of pair-wise aircraft encounters with conflict detection provided by the tracking system. Then Monte Carlo simulation is performed by using an agent-based tool that we develop, to quantify the probability of event occurrences. Finally, Bayesian Networks models are built to infer the dependencies of conflict detection effectiveness on the airspace design and tracking system performances. The outcomes of this study demonstrate improvement in conflict detection that better tracking system performances can provide, and the impact of airspace design under different tracking configurations. The results can be used in the UAM traffic network planning, and systems standardization for UAM flight tracking, towards safe urban air traffic.

Suggested Citation

  • Dai, Wei & Quek, Zhi Hao & Low, Kin Huat, 2024. "Probabilistic modeling and reasoning of conflict detection effectiveness by tracking systems towards safe urban air mobility operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023008220
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023008220
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109908?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:244:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023008220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.