IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v242y2024ics0951832023006257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model cascading overload failure and dynamic vulnerability analysis of facility network of metro station

Author

Listed:
  • Shen, Yi
  • Yang, Huang
  • Ren, Gang
  • Ran, Bin

Abstract

The existing studies mainly focused on the cascading failure of the whole metro but rarely on stations. In this paper, we map a metro station into a directed and hierarchical network, and propose a cascading overload failure model to study the network dynamic vulnerability. The passenger behavior and node load update are considered based on impedance function and mutual flow redistribution. Without changing the network topology, a flow optimization strategy is proposed to improve the network performance against cascading failure. Yuantong station of Nanjing Metro is studied. The results show the network is vulnerable and global failure occurs easily under small node tolerance. When the node tolerance excesses a critical value, the network can transit abruptly from global failure to balance state. We obtain that the critical node tolerances are 0.17 for the largest degree-based attack(LDA) and 0.19 for the largest load-based attack(LLA). The ranges of the optimal flow redistribution coefficient are identified by the flow optimization strategy, which are [0.15 0.2] for LDA and [0.2 0.25] for LLA. The result indicates that a proper guidance of passenger flow can be beneficial to the network performance while a strong intervention to passenger flow can instead increase the cascading failure risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Yi & Yang, Huang & Ren, Gang & Ran, Bin, 2024. "Model cascading overload failure and dynamic vulnerability analysis of facility network of metro station," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023006257
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023006257
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023006257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.