IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v239y2023ics0951832023004544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated decision model with reliability to support transport safety system analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yaxin
  • Ding, Yuxin
  • Guo, Yuliang
  • Cui, Haizhou
  • Gao, Haiyi
  • Zhou, Ziyu
  • (Aaron) Zhang, Nanbo
  • Zhu, Siyao
  • Chen, Faan

Abstract

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problems necessitate a methodology that is able to produce reliable and defendable decisions. This is especially the case when it comes to safety system analyses. This study constructs an integrated model, CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) – Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) – Spectral Clustering (SC) (i.e., CRITIC–MOORA–SC), which seamlessly incorporates three stages of MCDM (weighting, aggregating, and grouping) with decomposing into one process, with the capacity to deal with decision difficulties while maintaining a high level of reliability. The model is designed to support the transport safety analyses of 10 member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as Timor-Leste, including measuring road safety development, ranking and grouping safety performances, deconstructing safety performance indicators, decomposing overall achievement, quantifying safety changes over the past decade, and benchmarking approved practices. Enhanced comparisons of the results indicate the reliability and practicability of the proposed model, verifying its applicability for real-world decision activities. By doing so, this study provides policymakers and managers in the ASEAN region, as well as other parts of the world, with a support tool for creditable analyses in transport safety, strengthening their institutional capacity in decision-making activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yaxin & Ding, Yuxin & Guo, Yuliang & Cui, Haizhou & Gao, Haiyi & Zhou, Ziyu & (Aaron) Zhang, Nanbo & Zhu, Siyao & Chen, Faan, 2023. "An integrated decision model with reliability to support transport safety system analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:239:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023004544
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023004544
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braga, Joaquim A.P. & Andrade, António R., 2021. "Multivariate statistical aggregation and dimensionality reduction techniques to improve monitoring and maintenance in railways: The wheelset component," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Chou, Shuo-Yan & Chang, Yao-Hui & Shen, Chun-Ying, 2008. "A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 132-145, August.
    3. Daniel D. Lee & H. Sebastian Seung, 1999. "Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6755), pages 788-791, October.
    4. Louis Guttman, 1952. "Multiple group methods for common-factor analysis: Their basis, computation, and interpretation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(2), pages 209-222, June.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. Ganji, Seyedreza Seyedalizadeh & Rassafi, Amir Abbas & Bandari, Samaneh Jamshidi, 2020. "Application of evidential reasoning approach and OWA operator weights in road safety evaluation considering the best and worst practice frontiers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella & Izquierdo, Joaquín & La Fata, Concetta Manuela, 2018. "A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 394-402.
    8. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    9. Huang, Jia & Li, Zhaojun(Steven) & Liu, Hu-Chen, 2017. "New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 302-309.
    10. Edwards, Ward & Barron, F. Hutton, 1994. "SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 306-325, December.
    11. Aarts, L.T. & Houwing, S., 2015. "Benchmarking road safety performance by grouping local territories: A study in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 174-185.
    12. Belmansour, Ahmed-Tidjani & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2010. "An aggregation method for performance evaluation of a tandem homogenous production line with machines having multiple failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1193-1201.
    13. Chen, Faan & Zhu, Yilin & Zu, Jiacheng & Lyu, Jingyang & Yang, Junfeng, 2022. "Appraising road safety attainment by CRITIC-ELECTRE-FCM: A policymaking support for Southeast Asia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 104-118.
    14. Willem K. Brauers, 2004. "Multi‐objective optimization for facilities management," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 173-182, November.
    15. Hermans, Elke & Van den Bossche, Filip & Wets, Geert, 2009. "Uncertainty assessment of the road safety index," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1220-1228.
    16. Norman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer, 1963. "An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 458-467, April.
    17. Ahmed, Umair & Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella, 2021. "An integrated methodological approach for optimising complex systems subjected to predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Rungskunroch, Panrawee & Jack, Anson & Kaewunruen, Sakdirat, 2021. "Benchmarking on railway safety performance using Bayesian inference, decision tree and petri-net techniques based on long-term accidental data sets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Dragisa STANUJKIC & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Florentin SMARANDACHE & Zenonas TURSKIS, 2017. "The Use Of The Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment Method For Determining The Weights Of Criteria," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 116-133, December.
    20. Eggstaff, Justin W. & Mazzuchi, Thomas A. & Sarkani, Shahram, 2014. "The effect of the number of seed variables on the performance of Cooke′s classical model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 72-82.
    21. Michael Sheret, 1984. "The coefficient of variation: Weighting considerations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 289-295, October.
    22. Doyle, John R. & Green, Rodney H. & Bottomley, Paul A., 1997. "Judging Relative Importance: Direct Rating and Point Allocation Are Not Equivalent," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 65-72, April.
    23. Dhalmahapatra, Krantiraditya & Garg, Ashish & Singh, Kritika & Xavier, Nirmal Francis & Maiti, J., 2022. "An integrated RFUCOM – RTOPSIS approach for failure modes and effects analysis: A case of manufacturing industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    24. Bottomley, Paul A. & Doyle, John R., 2001. "A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 553-560, December.
    25. Ramos-Salgado, Cristóbal & Muñuzuri, Jesús & Aparicio-Ruiz, Pablo & Onieva, Luis, 2021. "A decision support system to design water supply and sewer pipes replacement intervention programs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger Chapman Burk & Richard M. Nehring, 2023. "An Empirical Comparison of Rank-Based Surrogate Weights in Additive Multiattribute Decision Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 55-72, March.
    2. Rađenović Žarko & Veselinović Ivana, 2017. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Method for the Assessment of Health Management Information Systems Efficiency," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 55(1), pages 121-142, March.
    3. Iwaro, Joseph & Mwasha, Abrahams & Williams, Rupert G. & Zico, Ricardo, 2014. "An Integrated Criteria Weighting Framework for the sustainable performance assessment and design of building envelope," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 417-434.
    4. Tom Pape, 2020. "Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources," Papers 2012.13813, arXiv.org.
    5. Zhang, Jingshun & Hu, Jiayi & Wang, Xitong & Fang, Lien & Jin, Yi & Li, Muyang & Liu, Yangqing & Wu, Anna & Wang, Libin & Liu, Ruining & Zhang, Yi & Chen, Faan, 2023. "Quantifying transport safety success at the regional level: A guide to policy and practice on investment for G20," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Ewa Roszkowska, 2020. "The extention rank ordering criteria weighting methods in fuzzy enviroment," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 30(2), pages 91-114.
    7. Dong, Yucheng & Liu, Yating & Liang, Haiming & Chiclana, Francisco & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2018. "Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 154-164.
    8. Yang, Guo-liang & Yang, Jian-Bo & Xu, Dong-Ling & Khoveyni, Mohammad, 2017. "A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in MADM," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 93-105.
    9. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Xinxin Liu & Xiaosheng Wang & Haiying Guo & Xiaojie An, 2021. "Benefit Allocation in Shared Water-Saving Management Contract Projects Based on Modified Expected Shapley Value," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 39-62, January.
    11. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Waste Segregation FMEA Model Integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and the PAPRIKA Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    12. Sadeghi, Aliasghar & Mohammadzadeh Moghaddam, Abolfazl, 2016. "Uncertainty-based prioritization of road safety projects: An application of data envelopment analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 28-36.
    13. Ti-An Chen, 2022. "Business Performance Evaluation for Tourism Factory: Using DEA Approach and Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    14. P P Sutton & R H Green, 2007. "Choice is a value statement. On inferring optimal multiple attribute portfolios from non-optimal nominations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(11), pages 1526-1533, November.
    15. Yasir Ahmed Solangi & Qingmei Tan & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Ifzal Ahmed, 2018. "The Selection of Wind Power Project Location in the Southeastern Corridor of Pakistan: A Factor Analysis, AHP, and Fuzzy-TOPSIS Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Yael Grushka-Cockayne & Bert De Reyck & Zeger Degraeve, 2008. "An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Improving European Air Traffic Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(8), pages 1395-1409, August.
    17. Feng Li & Han Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang & Gang Kou, 2021. "Data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation with reciprocal behaviors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 173-210, July.
    18. Petr Fiala, 2018. "Project portfolio designing using data envelopment analysis and De Novo optimisation," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(4), pages 847-859, December.
    19. Scholz, Michael & Pfeiffer, Jella & Rothlauf, Franz, 2017. "Using PageRank for non-personalized default rankings in dynamic markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 388-401.
    20. R. Pelissari & M. C. Oliveira & S. Ben Amor & A. Kandakoglu & A. L. Helleno, 2020. "SMAA methods and their applications: a literature review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 433-493, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:239:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023004544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.