IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v168y2017icp189-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new algorithm for prognostics using Subset Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Chiachío, Manuel
  • Chiachío, Juan
  • Sankararaman, Shankar
  • Goebel, Kai
  • Andrews, John

Abstract

This work presents an efficient computational framework for prognostics by combining the particle filter-based prognostics principles with the technique of Subset Simulation, first developed in S.K. Au and J.L. Beck [Probabilistic Engrg. Mech., 16 (2001), pp. 263-277], which has been named PFP-SubSim. The idea behind PFP-SubSim algorithm is to split the multi-step-ahead predicted trajectories into multiple branches of selected samples at various stages of the process, which correspond to increasingly closer approximations of the critical threshold. Following theoretical development, discussion and an illustrative example to demonstrate its efficacy, we report on experience using the algorithm for making predictions for the end-of-life and remaining useful life in the challenging application of fatigue damage propagation of carbon-fibre composite coupons using structural health monitoring data. Results show that PFP-SubSim algorithm outperforms the traditional particle filter-based prognostics approach in terms of computational efficiency, while achieving the same, or better, measure of accuracy in the prognostics estimates. It is also shown that PFP-SubSim algorithm gets its highest efficiency when dealing with rare-event simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiachío, Manuel & Chiachío, Juan & Sankararaman, Shankar & Goebel, Kai & Andrews, John, 2017. "A new algorithm for prognostics using Subset Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 189-199.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:168:y:2017:i:c:p:189-199
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016307335
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baraldi, Piero & Mangili, Francesca & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "Investigation of uncertainty treatment capability of model-based and data-driven prognostic methods using simulated data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 94-108.
    2. Cadini, F. & Zio, E. & Avram, D., 2009. "Model-based Monte Carlo state estimation for condition-based component replacement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 752-758.
    3. An, Dawn & Kim, Nam H. & Choi, Joo-Ho, 2015. "Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 223-236.
    4. Zio, Enrico & Peloni, Giovanni, 2011. "Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 403-409.
    5. Chiachío, Juan & Chiachío, Manuel & Sankararaman, Shankar & Saxena, Abhinav & Goebel, Kai, 2015. "Condition-based prediction of time-dependent reliability in composites," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 134-147.
    6. Jouin, Marine & Gouriveau, Rafael & Hissel, Daniel & Péra, Marie-Cécile & Zerhouni, Noureddine, 2016. "Degradations analysis and aging modeling for health assessment and prognostics of PEMFC," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 78-95.
    7. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    8. Myötyri, E. & Pulkkinen, U. & Simola, K., 2006. "Application of stochastic filtering for lifetime prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 200-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blancke, Olivier & Tahan, Antoine & Komljenovic, Dragan & Amyot, Normand & Lévesque, Mélanie & Hudon, Claude, 2018. "A holistic multi-failure mode prognosis approach for complex equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 136-151.
    2. Chiachío, Juan & Jalón, María L. & Chiachío, Manuel & Kolios, Athanasios, 2020. "A Markov chains prognostics framework for complex degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Chiachío, Juan & Chiachío, Manuel & Prescott, Darren & Andrews, John, 2019. "A knowledge-based prognostics framework for railway track geometry degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 127-141.
    4. Wu, Shaomin & Do, Phuc, 2017. "Editorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-3.
    5. Kim, Hyeonmin & Kim, Jung Taek & Heo, Gyunyoung, 2018. "Failure rate updates using condition-based prognostics in probabilistic safety assessments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 225-233.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Hyeonmin & Kim, Jung Taek & Heo, Gyunyoung, 2018. "Failure rate updates using condition-based prognostics in probabilistic safety assessments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 225-233.
    2. Fang, Xiaolei & Zhou, Rensheng & Gebraeel, Nagi, 2015. "An adaptive functional regression-based prognostic model for applications with missing data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 266-274.
    3. Tamilselvan, Prasanna & Wang, Pingfeng, 2013. "Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 124-135.
    4. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    5. Zio, Enrico & Compare, Michele, 2013. "Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 53-65.
    6. Chiachío, Juan & Chiachío, Manuel & Sankararaman, Shankar & Saxena, Abhinav & Goebel, Kai, 2015. "Condition-based prediction of time-dependent reliability in composites," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 134-147.
    7. Wang, Hai-Kun & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Jin, Tongdan, 2017. "Near-extreme system condition and near-extreme remaining useful time for a group of products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 103-110.
    8. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Wang, Pingfeng & Taek Yoon, Joung, 2012. "Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 120-135.
    9. Baraldi, Piero & Mangili, Francesca & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "Investigation of uncertainty treatment capability of model-based and data-driven prognostic methods using simulated data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 94-108.
    10. Khac Tuan Huynh & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer, 2012. "Adaptive condition-based maintenance decision framework for deteriorating systems operating under variable environment and uncertain condition monitoring," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(6), pages 602-623, December.
    11. Hu, Yang & Baraldi, Piero & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2015. "A particle filtering and kernel smoothing-based approach for new design component prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-31.
    12. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    13. Xiangang Cao & Pengfei Li & Song Ming, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction-Based Maintenance Decision Model for Stochastic Deterioration Equipment under Data-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Mishra, Madhav & Martinsson, Jesper & Rantatalo, Matti & Goebel, Kai, 2018. "Bayesian hierarchical model-based prognostics for lithium-ion batteries," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 25-35.
    15. Prakash, Om & Samantaray, Arun Kumar, 2021. "Prognosis of Dynamical System Components with Varying Degradation Patterns using model–data–fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Wang, Yiwei & Gogu, Christian & Kim, Nam H. & Haftka, Raphael T. & Binaud, Nicolas & Bes, Christian, 2019. "Noise-dependent ranking of prognostics algorithms based on discrepancy without true damage information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 86-100.
    17. Zhao, Zeqi & Bin Liang, & Wang, Xueqian & Lu, Weining, 2017. "Remaining useful life prediction of aircraft engine based on degradation pattern learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 74-83.
    18. Chiachío, Juan & Chiachío, Manuel & Prescott, Darren & Andrews, John, 2019. "A knowledge-based prognostics framework for railway track geometry degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 127-141.
    19. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    20. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:168:y:2017:i:c:p:189-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.