IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v124y2014icp117-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error

Author

Listed:
  • Asadzadeh, S.M.
  • Azadeh, A.

Abstract

This paper proposes an integrated systemic model for the integration of human reliability model with condition based maintenance (CBM) optimization. The problem of CBM optimization is formulated as finding the optimum parameters of a function for condition monitoring (CM) scheduling so that the average unit cost (AUC) of CBM system is minimized. The concept of functional resonance is employed to analyze human-induced failure scenarios emergent from erroneous functional dependencies. To quantify human reliability in CBM, the functional characteristics of human error in CBM as well as the main performance influencing factors (PIFs) are identified. The algorithms of diagnostics and prognostics are integrated in the simulation model of CBM. Then an exact simulation-optimization algorithm based on the use of two joint Fibonacci algorithms is proposed for global optimization of CM scheduling with human error. A sensitivity analysis has been performed based on the newly developed model considering multiple levels of human errors in CBM functions to observe the effects of human errors on overall system cost. The model is also useful in demonstrating the importance and effects of improving human and organizational aspects as well as technical aspects such as the accuracy and relevance of CM technology and the accuracy of prognostics algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:124:y:2014:i:c:p:117-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013003050
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cadini, F. & Zio, E. & Avram, D., 2009. "Model-based Monte Carlo state estimation for condition-based component replacement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 752-758.
    2. M J Carr & A H Christer, 2003. "Incorporating the potential for human error in maintenance models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(12), pages 1249-1253, December.
    3. van der Weide, J.A.M. & Pandey, M.D. & van Noortwijk, J.M., 2010. "Discounted cost model for condition-based maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 236-246.
    4. An, Dawn & Choi, Joo-Ho & Kim, Nam Ho, 2013. "Prognostics 101: A tutorial for particle filter-based prognostics algorithm using Matlab," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 161-169.
    5. J E Vinnem & J Seljelid & S Haugen & S Sklet & T Aven, 2009. "Generalized methodology for operational risk analysis of offshore installations," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 223(1), pages 87-97, March.
    6. Zio, E., 2009. "Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 125-141.
    7. Hongzhou Wang & Hoang Pham, 2006. "Reliability and Optimal Maintenance," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-325-3, January.
    8. Groth, Katrina M. & Mosleh, Ali, 2012. "A data-informed PIF hierarchy for model-based Human Reliability Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-174.
    9. Flage, Roger & Coit, David W. & Luxhøj, James T. & Aven, Terje, 2012. "Safety constraints applied to an adaptive Bayesian condition-based maintenance optimization model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 16-26.
    10. Noroozi, Alireza & Khakzad, Nima & Khan, Faisal & MacKinnon, Scott & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2013. "The role of human error in risk analysis: Application to pre- and post-maintenance procedures of process facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 251-258.
    11. Heo, Gyunyoung & Park, Jinkyun, 2010. "A framework for evaluating the effects of maintenance-related human errors in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 797-805.
    12. Tian, Zhigang & Jin, Tongdan & Wu, Bairong & Ding, Fangfang, 2011. "Condition based maintenance optimization for wind power generation systems under continuous monitoring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1502-1509.
    13. Zio, Enrico & Compare, Michele, 2013. "Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 53-65.
    14. Curcurù, Giuseppe & Galante, Giacomo & Lombardo, Alberto, 2010. "A predictive maintenance policy with imperfect monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 989-997.
    15. Tian, Zhigang & Liao, Haitao, 2011. "Condition based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems using proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 581-589.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    3. Caballé, N.C. & Castro, I.T. & Pérez, C.J. & Lanza-Gutiérrez, J.M., 2015. "A condition-based maintenance of a dependent degradation-threshold-shock model in a system with multiple degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 98-109.
    4. Xanthopoulos, A.S. & Koulouriotis, D.E. & Botsaris, P.N., 2015. "Single-stage Kanban system with deterioration failures and condition-based preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 111-122.
    5. Justin Pence & Zahra Mohaghegh, 2020. "A Discourse on the Incorporation of Organizational Factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Key Questions and Categorical Review," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(6), pages 1183-1211, June.
    6. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    7. Azadeh, A. & Asadzadeh, S.M. & Salehi, N. & Firoozi, M., 2015. "Condition-based maintenance effectiveness for series–parallel power generation system—A combined Markovian simulation model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 357-368.
    8. Vališ, David & Žák, Libor & Pokora, Ondřej & Lánský, Petr, 2016. "Perspective analysis outcomes of selected tribodiagnostic data used as input for condition based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 231-242.
    9. Hesabi, Hadis & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hajji, Adnène, 2022. "A deep learning predictive model for selective maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    10. Zhou, Dengji & Yu, Ziqiang & Zhang, Huisheng & Weng, Shilie, 2016. "A novel grey prognostic model based on Markov process and grey incidence analysis for energy conversion equipment degradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 420-429.
    11. Juan Zhao & Ehmet Kasim, 2023. "Study of Dynamic Solutions for Human–Machine System with Human Error and Common-Cause Failure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, June.
    12. Alrabghi, Abdullah & Tiwari, Ashutosh, 2016. "A novel approach for modelling complex maintenance systems using discrete event simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 160-170.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    3. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Tamilselvan, Prasanna & Wang, Pingfeng, 2013. "Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 124-135.
    5. He, Rui & Tian, Zhigang & Wang, Yifei & Zuo, Mingjian & Guo, Ziwei, 2023. "Condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems considering prognostic information and degraded working efficiency," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Wang, Pingfeng & Taek Yoon, Joung, 2012. "Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 120-135.
    7. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan Van Houtum, 2022. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," DEM Discussion Paper Series 22-01, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    8. Shengjin Tang & Xiaosong Guo & Zhijie Zhou, 2014. "Mis-specification analysis of linear Wiener process–based degradation models for the remaining useful life estimation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(5), pages 478-487, October.
    9. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    10. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    11. Abrishami, Shokoufeh & Khakzad, Nima & Hosseini, Seyed Mahmoud, 2020. "A data-based comparison of BN-HRA models in assessing human error probability: An offshore evacuation case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. Vega, Manuel A. & Hu, Zhen & Todd, Michael D., 2020. "Optimal maintenance decisions for deteriorating quoin blocks in miter gates subject to uncertainty in the condition rating protocol," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    13. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    14. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    15. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2017. "Joint predictive maintenance and inventory strategy for multi-component systems using Birnbaum’s structural importance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 249-261.
    16. Wei Teng & Xiaolong Zhang & Yibing Liu & Andrew Kusiak & Zhiyong Ma, 2016. "Prognosis of the Remaining Useful Life of Bearings in a Wind Turbine Gearbox," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Zio, Enrico & Compare, Michele, 2013. "Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 53-65.
    18. Truong-Ba, Huy & Cholette, Michael E. & Borghesani, Pietro & Ma, Lin & Kent, Geoff, 2021. "Condition-based inspection policies for boiler heat exchangers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 232-243.
    19. Juan Izquierdo & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Jone Uribetxebarria & Asier Erguido, 2019. "Framework for Managing Maintenance of Wind Farms Based on a Clustering Approach and Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:124:y:2014:i:c:p:117-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.