IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v262y2025ics0951832025003862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sequential inspection policy optimization for hierarchical multistate systems

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Boyuan
  • Zheng, Yi-Xuan
  • Liu, Zhaoyi
  • Liu, Yu

Abstract

Inspections, aiming at identifying the system’s health status by sensing techniques or experts’ observations, serve a crucial role in health management of engineered systems. In real-world applications, systems often exhibit multistate and hierarchical characteristics, allowing inspections to be implemented across multiple physical levels. Nevertheless, due to the limited inspection resources and the uncertainty associated with the system’s health status, it necessitates planning the multilevel inspection policy sequentially. In this article, a novel sequential inspection policy optimization framework is proposed for hierarchical multistate systems, wherein the optimization problem is captured within a finite-horizon partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). To effectively solve the resulting POMDP, a tailored value iteration algorithm with condensed spaces is developed. The POMDP’s state space is reduced by merging all possible system states, and the POMDP’s action space is cut down by eliminating ineffective inspection actions. Several propositions are provided to validate the algorithm’s effectiveness. A three-component pipeline system, along with an electro-mechanical actuator system, is given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The results indicate that the state and action spaces can be significantly reduced while the sequential inspection policy outperforms the traditional static policy in terms of revealing the system’s health status.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Boyuan & Zheng, Yi-Xuan & Liu, Zhaoyi & Liu, Yu, 2025. "Sequential inspection policy optimization for hierarchical multistate systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003862
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025003862
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:262:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025003862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.