IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v274y2024ics0925527324001671.html

Rework in relational engineer-to-order production systems: An ‘error-as-process’ archetype

Author

Listed:
  • Love, Peter E.D.
  • Matthews, Jane
  • Ika, Lavagnon A.

Abstract

While an extensive body of work has examined the dynamics of rework in engineer-to-order (ETO) production systems, and several archetypes to mitigate its occurrence have been produced, the role of error-making has yet to be thoroughly examined. This paper uses the theoretical lens of error-as-process to explain the rework phenomena where errors are viewed as a chain of emergent triggers, adaptive activities, and social interactions that progress and transform over time in an ETO production system. We develop a resilient error-as-process archetype-based emergent best practice to address the following research questions: (1) How and why do errors and rework occur? and (2) How should a project system adapt and respond to errors and manage rework? An inductive case study of a relational ETO production system – an AU$19.8 billion transport infrastructure project procured using a program alliance – is undertaken to examine our research questions. Through various data collection methods (e.g., interviews, documentation, and site dairies), several rework events occurring in construction are identified and analysed using our process-oriented lens. Several latent conditions (e.g., production pressure and procedural drift) and contributory factors (e.g., complacency creep and communication breakdowns) resulting in error-making and rework are unearthed. We also reveal the alliance was able to adapt and respond to errors and its rework by building resilience into its production ecosystem, as this enhanced its team and subcontractors’ adaptive capacity. Our theoretically robust error-as-process archetype is grounded in the actualities of practice. It provides a frame of reference to show how relational ETO production systems should mitigate their rework. Future research is required to validate our resilient error-as-process archetype so that best practices can be identified and drawn upon to contain and reduce errors and mitigate rework in construction and other ETO production systems (e.g. shipbuilding), where relational contracting prevails.

Suggested Citation

  • Love, Peter E.D. & Matthews, Jane & Ika, Lavagnon A., 2024. "Rework in relational engineer-to-order production systems: An ‘error-as-process’ archetype," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:274:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324001671
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324001671
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swapnil Bhalla & Erlend Alfnes & Hans-Henrik Hvolby, 2023. "Tools and practices for tactical delivery date setting in engineer-to-order environments: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(7), pages 2339-2371, April.
    2. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    3. Alfnes, Erlend & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed & Dreyer, Heidi C., 2023. "Rearticulating supply chain design and operation principles to mitigate uncertainty in the Norwegian engineer-to-order shipbuilding sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. John W. Gardner*, 2020. "Managing Production Yields and Rework through Feedback on Speed, Quality, and Quantity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(9), pages 2182-2209, September.
    5. Zhou, Yuxuan & Wang, Xun & Naim, Mohamed M. & Gosling, Jonathan, 2022. "A system dynamics archetype to mitigate rework effects in engineer-to-order supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Anna-Maija Hietajärvi & Kirsi Aaltonen, 2018. "The formation of a collaborative project identity in an infrastructure alliance project," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Li, Lingjia & Shan, Shuo & Dai, Jing & Che, Wen & Shou, Yongyi, 2022. "The impact of green supply chain management on green innovation: A meta-analysis from the inter-organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    8. Mahmoud Efatmaneshnik & Shraga Shoval, 2023. "Stochastic modelling of process scheduling for reduced rework cost and scrap," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(1), pages 219-237, January.
    9. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Jamal, A.M.M. & Mondal, Sanjay, 2008. "Optimal batch sizing in a multi-stage production system with rework consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 915-929, February.
    10. Love, Peter E.D. & Matthews, Jane, 2020. "Quality, requisite imagination and resilience: Managing risk and uncertainty in construction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Chen, Zhenzhen & Zhu, Wanshan & Crama, Pascale, 2023. "Subcontracting and rework cost sharing in engineering–procurement–construction projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    12. P. E. D. Love & H. Li, 2000. "Overcoming the problems associated with quality certification," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 139-149.
    13. Cannas, Violetta Giada & Gosling, Jonathan, 2021. "A decade of engineering-to-order (2010–2020): Progress and emerging themes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    14. Gary J. Young & Martin P. Charns & Stephen M. Shortell, 2001. "Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(10), pages 935-951, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seyoung Park & Eun Ryung Lee & Sungchul Lee & Geonwoo Kim, 2019. "Dantzig Type Optimization Method with Applications to Portfolio Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Pero, Margherita & Stößlein, Martin & Cigolini, Roberto, 2015. "Linking product modularity to supply chain integration in the construction and shipbuilding industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 602-615.
    3. Faridah Djellal & Camal Gallouj & Faïz Gallouj, 2004. "De l'hôpital-fonction de production à l'hôpital service complexe et noeud de réseaux : Les différentes facettes de l'innovation hospitalière," Post-Print halshs-01247786, HAL.
    4. Cavero, Jose V. & Alemany, M.M.E. & Esteso, Ana & Giménez, Alfredo, 2025. "Revenue management optimization for make-to-order and engineering-to-order manufacturing context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Sofia Patsali, 2019. "Opening the black box of university-suppliers' co-invention: some field study evidence," Working Papers of BETA 2019-46, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Sandrin, Enrico & Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano, 2018. "Leveraging high-involvement practices to develop mass customization capability: A contingent configurational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 335-345.
    7. Beber, Caetano Luiz & Carpio, Andres Fabricio Ruales & Almadani, Mohamad Isam & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2019. "Dairy supply chain in Southern Brazil: barriers to competitiveness," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 22(5), July.
    8. Daniela D. Viana & Iris D. Tommelein & Carlos T. Formoso, 2017. "Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Al-Salamah, Muhammad, 2019. "Economic production quantity in an imperfect manufacturing process with synchronous and asynchronous flexible rework rates," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    10. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo & Mohammadi, Babak, 2014. "A deterministic multi product single machine EPQ model with backordering, scraped products, rework and interruption in manufacturing process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 9-27.
    11. W. Pearn & R. Su & M. Weng & C. Hsu, 2011. "Optimal production run time for two-stage production system with imperfect processes and allowable shortages," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(4), pages 533-545, December.
    12. Ilya Okhmatovskiy & Robert J. David, 2012. "Setting Your Own Standards: Internal Corporate Governance Codes as a Response to Institutional Pressure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 155-176, February.
    13. Varun Karamshetty & Harwin De Vries & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Sarah Dewilde & Warnyta Minnaard & Dennis Ongarora & Kennedy Abuga & Prashant Yadav, 2022. "Inventory Management Practices in Private Healthcare Facilities in Nairobi County," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 828-846, February.
    14. Mellat-Parast, Mahour & Digman, Lester A., 2008. "Learning: The interface of quality management and strategic alliances," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 820-829, August.
    15. Mitali Sarkar & Li Pan & Bikash Koli Dey & Biswajit Sarkar, 2020. "Does the Autonomation Policy Really Help in a Smart Production System for Controlling Defective Production?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Mariola Ciszewska-Mlinaric, 2009. "The Adaptive Capabilities of Organizations. Case of Polish Public Hospitals," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 3(3), September.
    17. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2020. "Determinants for order-fulfilment strategies in engineer-to-order companies: Insights from the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Young, Gary J. & Meterko, Mark M. & Mohr, David & Shwartz, Michael & Lin, Hai, 2009. "Congruence in the assessment of service quality between employees and customers: A study of a public health care delivery system," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1127-1135, November.
    19. Liu, Guoli & Li, Feng & Yang, Xianyan & Qiu, Shuang, 2020. "The multi-stage multi-product batch-sizing problem in the steel industry," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    20. Dekkers, Rob & Chang, C.M. & Kreutzfeldt, Jochen, 2013. "The interface between “product design and engineering” and manufacturing: A review of the literature and empirical evidence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 316-333.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:274:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324001671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.