IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v133y2011i2p496-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do it separately or simultaneously--An empirical analysis of a conjoint implementation of TQM and TPM on plant performance

Author

Listed:
  • Konecny, Philipp A.
  • Thun, Jörn-Henrik

Abstract

Over the last decades, Total Quality Management (TQM) and Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) have become key concepts for improving production. The majority of modern manufacturing companies has implemented at least one of these improvement programs or even both of them. The common ground of TQM and TPM is the focus on human resources. In this paper, the impact of TQM and TPM on plant performance and especially the supporting role of employee involvement practices is investigated empirically using multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling. The data used for conducting the analyses is taken from the international research project High Performance Manufacturing that contains the data of 238 plants. The results indicate that TQM and TPM, supported by HR practices, have a significant potential to improve plant performance. However, a simultaneous implementation of both concepts does not necessarily lead to superior performance. As potential reason for this, human resources are regarded as limiting factor both improvement programs draw on. Accordingly, this scarce resource is identified as crucial element with respect to performance when implementing TQM and TPM simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Konecny, Philipp A. & Thun, Jörn-Henrik, 2011. "Do it separately or simultaneously--An empirical analysis of a conjoint implementation of TQM and TPM on plant performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 496-507, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:133:y:2011:i:2:p:496-507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527310004780
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, F. T. S. & Lau, H. C. W. & Ip, R. W. L. & Chan, H. K. & Kong, S., 2005. "Implementation of total productive maintenance: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 71-94, January.
    2. Kevin B. Hendricks & Vinod R. Singhal, 1997. "Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms That Have Won Quality Awards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(9), pages 1258-1274, September.
    3. Thomas C. Powell, 1995. "Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 15-37.
    4. Linderman, Kevin & McKone-Sweet, Kathleen E. & Anderson, John C., 2005. "An integrated systems approach to process control and maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 324-340, July.
    5. Sadao Sakakibara & Barbara B. Flynn & Roger G. Schroeder & William T. Morris, 1997. "The Impact of Just-in-Time Manufacturing and Its Infrastructure on Manufacturing Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(9), pages 1246-1257, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valmohammadi, Changiz & Roshanzamir, Shervin, 2015. "The guidelines of improvement: Relations among organizational culture, TQM and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 167-178.
    2. Ifeoluwa Elemure & Hom Nath Dhakal & Michel Leseure & Jovana Radulovic, 2023. "Integration of Lean Green and Sustainability in Manufacturing: A Review on Current State and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Bortolotti, Thomas & Danese, Pamela & Flynn, Barbara B. & Romano, Pietro, 2015. "Leveraging fitness and lean bundles to build the cumulative performance sand cone model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 227-241.
    4. Vishal Singh Patyal & K. Maddulety, 2015. "Interrelationship between Total Quality Management and Six Sigma: A Review," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(6), pages 1025-1060, December.
    5. Oluwaseun Niyi Anifowose & Matina Ghasemi & Banji Rildwan Olaleye, 2022. "Total Quality Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ (SMEs) Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation Speed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Ortega Jimenez, Cesar H. & Machuca, Jose A.D. & Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Filippini, Roberto, 2015. "The pursuit of responsiveness in production environments: From flexibility to reconfigurability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 157-172.
    7. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande & Zhu, Kaihang, 2019. "Supply chain quality integration: A taxonomy perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 236-246.
    8. Abreu-Ledón, René & Luján-García, Darkys E. & Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Escobar-Pérez, Bernabé, 2018. "A meta-analytic study of the impact of Lean Production on business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 83-102.
    9. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2022. "Insight into the Critical Success Factors of Performance-Based Budgeting Implementation in the Public Sector for Sustainable Development in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-37, October.
    10. Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Kumar, Vikas & Chaikittisilp, Sariya & Tan, Kim Hua, 2018. "The effect of lean methods and tools on the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 170-180.
    11. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Fogliatto, Flavio S. & Cauchick-Miguel, Paulo A. & Kurnia, Sherah & Jurburg, Daniel, 2021. "Integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into Total Productive Maintenance practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    12. Minh Hue Nguyen & Anh Chi Phan & Yoshiki Matsui, 2018. "Contribution of Quality Management Practices to Sustainability Performance of Vietnamese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, January.
    13. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2023. "The relationships between soft and hard factors of the Toyota way: a socio-technical perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 768-779, June.
    14. Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela & Machuca, José A.D. & Marin-Garcia, Juan A., 2018. "Triple-A and competitive advantage in supply chains: Empirical research in developed countries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 48-61.
    15. Hung, Yick-Hin & Li, Leon Y.O. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Uncovering hidden capacity in overall equipment effectiveness management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krohmer, Harley & Homburg, Christian & Workman, John P., 2002. "Should marketing be cross-functional? Conceptual development and international empirical evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 451-465, June.
    2. Charles J. Corbett & María J. Montes-Sancho & David A. Kirsch, 2005. "The Financial Impact of ISO 9000 Certification in the United States: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1046-1059, July.
    3. Ana Kundid Novokmet & Andrijana Rogošiæ, 2017. "Long-Term Financial Effects of Quality Management System Maturity Based on ISO 9001 Principles," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(S11), pages 1003-1003.
    4. Victoria Pekka Economou & Pantelis G. Chatzikonstantinou, 2009. "Gaining Company’s Sustained Competitive Advantage, Is Really a Necessary Precondition for Improved Organizational Performance? The Case of TQM," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 83-100.
    5. Sadikoglu, Esin & Zehir, Cemal, 2010. "Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 13-26, September.
    6. Cho, Young Sik & Linderman, Kevin, 2019. "Metacognition-based process improvement practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 132-144.
    7. Edelcio Koitiro Nisiyama & José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari & Chen Yen-Tsang & Andson Braga de Aguiar, 2016. "The Use of Management Control Systems and Operations Management Techniques," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(2), pages 56-81, March.
    8. Tari, Juan Jose & Molina, Jose Francisco & Castejon, Juan Luis, 2007. "The relationship between quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 483-501, December.
    9. Manthos D. Delis & Pantelis Kazakis & Constantin Zopounidis, 2021. "Management Practices and Takeover Decisions," Working Papers 2021_10, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    10. Andy C. L. Yeung & Chris K. Y. Lo & T. C. E. Cheng, 2011. "Behind the Iron Cage: An Institutional Perspective on ISO 9000 Adoption and CEO Compensation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1600-1612, December.
    11. Joshua G. Rosett & Richard N. Rosett, 1999. "Characteristics of TQM: Evidence from the RIT/USA Today Quality Cup Competition," NBER Working Papers 7241, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Banker, Rajiv D. & Bardhan, Indranil R. & Chen, Tai-Yuan, 2008. "The role of manufacturing practices in mediating the impact of activity-based costing on plant performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Voros, Jozsef, 2002. "Product balancing under conditions of quality inflation, cost pressures and growth strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 153-166, August.
    14. Irina I. Frolova & Emma N. Gilyazeva, 2018. "Foreign Experience of TQM Application in Practice," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 36-49, April.
    15. L. M. Daphne Yiu & Hugo K. S. Lam & Andy C. L. Yeung & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Enhancing the Financial Returns of R&D Investments through Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1658-1678, July.
    16. Vörös, József, 2003. "A minőség figyelembevételének szükségessége az egyensúlyi állapot meghatározásában [The need to consider quality when determining a state of equilibrium]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 6-21.
    17. Lai, Kee-hung & Cheng, T. C. Edwin, 2005. "Effects of quality management and marketing on organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 446-456, April.
    18. Vera Ferrón Vílchez & Nicole Darnall, 2016. "Two are Better Than One: The Link Between Management Systems and Business Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 221-240, May.
    19. Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2010. "An empirical study of employee loyalty, service quality and firm performance in the service industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 109-120, March.
    20. Prodan Igor & Ahlin Branka, 2008. "A Best Practice Model for Useful Suggestions Management," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 41(2), pages 50-61, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:133:y:2011:i:2:p:496-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.