IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v576y2021ics0378437121003149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth network models with random number of attached links

Author

Listed:
  • Sidorov, Sergei
  • Mironov, Sergei

Abstract

In the process of many real networks’ growth, each new node joins a few existing nodes, the number of which is unknown in advance. However, classical network growth models assume that the number of nodes to which each newborn node links is constant. In this regard, the main research question of this paper is as follows: how do structural properties of networks generated in accordance with growth models with random number of attached links, change (in comparison with networks with a constant number of attached links)? In this paper, we restrict our analysis to the two growth network models: the Barabási–Albert (BA) model and the triadic closure (TC) model. However, both in the BA and in the TC models the number of links attached to each new node of the network is constant on every iteration, which is not quite realistic. In this paper we extend both the BA and the TC models by allowing the number of newly added links to be random, under some mild assumptions on its distribution law. We examine the geometric properties of networks generated by the proposed models analytically and empirically to show that their properties differ from those of the classical BA and TC models. In particular, while the degree distributions of the generated networks follow the power law, their exponents vary depending on the thickness of the tail of the distribution that generates the number of attached links, and may differ significantly from the value of the corresponding exponent γ=−3 for the networks generated by the classical BA and TC model. The ‘random’ versions of models have a useful feature: they are capable of creating new nodes with a high degree at any iteration. This greatly distinguishes them from classical models, in which the nodes that appeared in the early iterations gain a significant advantage. The property of the proposed model, associated with the possibility of late arrivals to receive a random number of neighbors (which can be arbitrarily large), seems to be capable to simulate the temporal behavior of real networks in a more realistic way.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidorov, Sergei & Mironov, Sergei, 2021. "Growth network models with random number of attached links," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 576(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:576:y:2021:i:c:s0378437121003149
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437121003149
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carayol, Nicolas & Bergé, Laurent & Cassi, Lorenzo & Roux, Pascale, 2019. "Unintended triadic closure in social networks: The strategic formation of research collaborations between French inventors," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 218-238.
    2. Brunson, Jason Cory, 2015. "Triadic analysis of affiliation networks," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(4), pages 480-508, December.
    3. Souza, Thársis T.P. & Aste, Tomaso, 2019. "Predicting future stock market structure by combining social and financial network information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    4. Carayol, Nicolas & Bergé, Laurent & Cassi, Lorenzo & Roux, Pascale, 2019. "Unintended triadic closure in social networks: The strategic formation of research collaborations between French inventors," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 218-238.
    5. Itzhack, Royi & Muchnik, Lev & Erez, Tom & Tsaban, Lea & Goldenberg, Jacob & Solomon, Sorin & Louzoun, Yoram, 2010. "Empirical extraction of mechanisms underlying real world network generation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(22), pages 5308-5318.
    6. Ren, Fu-Xin & Shen, Hua-Wei & Cheng, Xue-Qi, 2012. "Modeling the clustering in citation networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(12), pages 3533-3539.
    7. Cristian Candia & C. Jara-Figueroa & Carlos Rodriguez-Sickert & Albert-László Barabási & César A. Hidalgo, 2019. "The universal decay of collective memory and attention," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 82-91, January.
    8. Osnat Mokryn & Allon Wagner & Marcel Blattner & Eytan Ruppin & Yuval Shavitt, 2016. "The Role of Temporal Trends in Growing Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Emily M. Jin & Michelle Girvan & M. E. J. Newman, 2001. "The Structure of Growing Social Networks," Working Papers 01-06-032, Santa Fe Institute.
    10. Yanbo Zhou & An Zeng & Wei-Hong Wang, 2015. "Temporal Effects in Trend Prediction: Identifying the Most Popular Nodes in the Future," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-10, March.
    11. P. A. W Lewis & G. S. Shedler, 1979. "Simulation of nonhomogeneous poisson processes by thinning," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 403-413, September.
    12. Tingting Song & Qian Tang & Jinghua Huang, 2019. "Triadic Closure, Homophily, and Reciprocation: An Empirical Investigation of Social Ties Between Content Providers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 912-926, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Carayol & Elodie Carpentier, 2022. "The spread of academic invention: a nationwide case study on French data (1995–2012)," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1395-1421, October.
    2. Pierre Cotterlaz, 2021. "Three essays on spatial frictions [Trois essais sur les frictions spatiales]," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03436173, HAL.
    3. He, Chaocheng & Liu, Fuzhen & Dong, Ke & Wu, Jiang & Zhang, Qingpeng, 2023. "Research on the formation mechanism of research leadership relations: An exponential random graph model analysis approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    4. Pierre Cotterlaz, 2021. "Three essays on spatial frictions [Trois essais sur les frictions spatiales]," SciencePo Working papers tel-03436173, HAL.
    5. Laurent R. Bergé, 2017. "Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 785-815, November.
    6. Giesecke, K. & Schwenkler, G., 2019. "Simulated likelihood estimators for discretely observed jump–diffusions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 297-320.
    7. Johansson, Tobias, 2017. "Gossip spread in social network Models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 126-134.
    8. Mohammadi, M. & Rezakhah, S. & Modarresi, N., 2020. "Semi-Lévy driven continuous-time GARCH process," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 557(C).
    9. M. Eren Akbiyik & Mert Erkul & Killian Kaempf & Vaiva Vasiliauskaite & Nino Antulov-Fantulin, 2021. "Ask "Who", Not "What": Bitcoin Volatility Forecasting with Twitter Data," Papers 2110.14317, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    10. Canyakmaz, Caner & Özekici, Süleyman & Karaesmen, Fikri, 2019. "An inventory model where customer demand is dependent on a stochastic price process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 139-152.
    11. Cavaliere, Giuseppe & Lu, Ye & Rahbek, Anders & Stærk-Østergaard, Jacob, 2023. "Bootstrap inference for Hawkes and general point processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 133-165.
    12. Zhenpeng Li & Xijin Tang & Zhenjie Hong, 2022. "Collective attention dynamic induced by novelty decay," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(8), pages 1-11, August.
    13. Julio A. Crego, 2017. "Short Selling Ban and Intraday Dynamics," Working Papers wp2018_1715, CEMFI.
    14. Bergé, Laurent & Carayol, Nicolas & Roux, Pascale, 2018. "How do inventor networks affect urban invention?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 137-162.
    15. Swishchuk, Anatoliy & Zagst, Rudi & Zeller, Gabriela, 2021. "Hawkes processes in insurance: Risk model, application to empirical data and optimal investment," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PA), pages 107-124.
    16. Karan, Rituraj & Biswal, Bibhu, 2017. "A model for evolution of overlapping community networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 474(C), pages 380-390.
    17. Hackney, Jeremy & Marchal, Fabrice, 2011. "A coupled multi-agent microsimulation of social interactions and transportation behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 296-309, May.
    18. Lu Shaochuan, 2023. "Scalable Bayesian Multiple Changepoint Detection via Auxiliary Uniformisation," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(1), pages 88-113, April.
    19. Ji, Jingru & Wang, Donghua & Xu, Dinghai & Xu, Chi, 2020. "Combining a self-exciting point process with the truncated generalized Pareto distribution: An extreme risk analysis under price limits," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 52-70.
    20. Jang, Hyun Jin & Woo, Han-Gyun & Lee, Changyong, 2017. "Hawkes process-based technology impact analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 511-529.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:576:y:2021:i:c:s0378437121003149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.