IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v565y2021ics0378437120308463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A case study of the pyramid scheme in China based on communication network

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Pihu
  • Lu, Xin
  • Gong, Zaiwu
  • Sun, Duoyong

Abstract

This paper discusses the structure and endogenous process of a pyramid scheme organization. While most previous studies focus on the operation mode of pyramid scheme and its destruction to social economy, we investigate the non-trivial microstructure and endogenous interaction within the pyramid scheme. By using the motif analysis and the exponential random graph model (ERGM), we conducted an in-depth study on the communication network of a specific pyramid scheme organizations. Through integration of the communication networks with the organizational hierarchical structure, we explore what is the typical structure of a pyramid scheme organization and how do people interact with each other in the organization. The results show that the pyramid scheme communication network is a sparse network and obeys a core–peripheral structure. In terms of personnel interactions, pyramid scheme communication network presents significant homogeneity, with minimal cross-community and cross-hierarchy interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Pihu & Lu, Xin & Gong, Zaiwu & Sun, Duoyong, 2021. "A case study of the pyramid scheme in China based on communication network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:565:y:2021:i:c:s0378437120308463
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437120308463
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunter, David R. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Handcock, Mark S., 2008. "Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 248-258, March.
    2. Crittenden, Victoria L. & Albaum, Gerald, 2015. "The misplaced controversy about internal consumption: Not just a direct selling phenomenon," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 421-429.
    3. Steven Goodreau & James Kitts & Martina Morris, 2009. "Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(1), pages 103-125, February.
    4. Bhattacharya, Patralekha & Mehta, Krishna Kumar, 2000. "Socialization in network marketing organizations: is it cult behavior?1," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 361-374, July.
    5. Sahand Khakabimamaghani & Iman Sharafuddin & Norbert Dichter & Ina Koch & Ali Masoudi-Nejad, 2013. "QuateXelero: An Accelerated Exact Network Motif Detection Algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Chris Jarvis, 2000. "The Rise and Fall of the Pyramid Schemes in Albania," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 47(1), pages 1-1.
    7. Bosley, Stacie A. & Bellemare, Marc F. & Umwali, Linda & York, Joshua, 2019. "Decision-making and vulnerability in a pyramid scheme fraud," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Claudia Groß & Dirk Vriens, 2019. "The Role of the Distributor Network in the Persistence of Legal and Ethical Problems of Multi-level Marketing Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 333-355, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom A. B. Snijders & Christian E. G. Steglich, 2015. "Representing Micro–Macro Linkages by Actor-based Dynamic Network Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(2), pages 222-271, May.
    2. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.
    3. Duncan A. Clark & Mark S. Handcock, 2022. "Comparing the real‐world performance of exponential‐family random graph models and latent order logistic models for social network analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(2), pages 566-587, April.
    4. Xu, Qifa & Li, Mengting & Jiang, Cuixia & He, Yaoyao, 2019. "Interconnectedness and systemic risk network of Chinese financial institutions: A LASSO-CoVaR approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    5. Austin M. Miller & Samantha Snyder & Stacie A. Bosley & Sarah Greenman, 2023. "Income disclosure and consumer judgment in a multilevel marketing experiment," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 92-120, January.
    6. Lee, Jihui & Li, Gen & Wilson, James D., 2020. "Varying-coefficient models for dynamic networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Peng, Tai-Quan, 2015. "Assortative mixing, preferential attachment, and triadic closure: A longitudinal study of tie-generative mechanisms in journal citation networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 250-262.
    8. Gönül Doğan & Kenan Kalayci & Priscilla Man, 2024. "Pyramid Schemes," Discussion Papers Series 667, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    9. Claudia Groß & Dirk Vriens, 2019. "The Role of the Distributor Network in the Persistence of Legal and Ethical Problems of Multi-level Marketing Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 333-355, May.
    10. Vishesh Karwa & Pavel N. Krivitsky & Aleksandra B. Slavković, 2017. "Sharing social network data: differentially private estimation of exponential family random-graph models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(3), pages 481-500, April.
    11. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Ji Youn (Rose) Kim & Michael Howard & Emily Cox Pahnke & Warren Boeker, 2016. "Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 22-44, January.
    12. Sándor Juhász, 2021. "Spinoffs and tie formation in cluster knowledge networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1404, April.
    13. Kayvan Sadeghi & Alessandro Rinaldo, 2020. "Hierarchical models for independence structures of networks," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 439-457, August.
    14. Duxbury, Scott W, 2017. "Diagnosing Multicollinearity in Exponential Random Graph Models," OSF Preprints hz93j, Center for Open Science.
    15. Veremyev, Alexander & Boginski, Vladimir & Pasiliao, Eduardo L. & Prokopyev, Oleg A., 2022. "On integer programming models for the maximum 2-club problem and its robust generalizations in sparse graphs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 86-101.
    16. Anna‐Maria Kindt & Matthias Geissler & Kilian Bühling, 2022. "Be my (little) partner?!—Universities' role in regional innovation systems when large firms are rare," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1274-1295, November.
    17. Caroline Glackin & Murat Adivar, 2023. "Modeling independent sales representative performance: application of predictive analytics in direct selling for improved outcomes," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(4), pages 613-628, December.
    18. Tom Broekel & Marcel Bednarz, 2018. "Disentangling link formation and dissolution in spatial networks: An Application of a Two-Mode STERGM to a Project-Based R&D Network in the German Biotechnology Industry," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 677-704, September.
    19. Michaela Hausdorf, 2024. "What You Get Is What You See—The Mutual Relationships between Images of Human Nature and Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Adam M. Kleinbaum & Toby E. Stuart & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1316-1336, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:565:y:2021:i:c:s0378437120308463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.