IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v287y2000i3p644-659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From individual choice to group decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Galam, Serge
  • Zucker, Jean-Daniel

Abstract

Some universal features are independent of both the social nature of the individuals making the decision and the nature of the decision itself. On this basis a simple magnet like model is built. Pair interactions are introduced to measure the degree of exchange among individuals while discussing. An external uniform field is included to account for a possible pressure from outside. Individual biases with respect to the issue at stake are also included using local random fields. A unique postulate of minimum conflict is assumed. The model is then solved with emphasis on its psycho-sociological implications. Counter-intuitive results are obtained. At this stage no new physical technicality is involved. Instead the full psycho-sociological implications of the model are drawn. Few cases are then detailed to enlight them. In addition, several numerical experiments based on our model are shown to give both an insight on the dynamics of the model and suggest further research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Galam, Serge & Zucker, Jean-Daniel, 2000. "From individual choice to group decision-making," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 644-659.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:287:y:2000:i:3:p:644-659
    DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00399-X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843710000399X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00399-X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stauffer, D. & de Oliveira, P.M.C. & de Oliveira, S.Moss & dos Santos, R.M.Zorzenon, 1996. "Monte Carlo simulations of sexual reproduction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 231(4), pages 504-514.
    2. Galam, Serge, 1997. "Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 66-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massari, Giovanni F. & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Carbone, Giuseppe, 2019. "Are distrust relationships beneficial for group performance? The influence of the scope of distrust on the emergence of collective intelligence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 343-355.
    2. Battiston, Stefano & Bonabeau, Eric & Weisbuch, Gérard, 2003. "Decision making dynamics in corporate boards," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 322(C), pages 567-582.
    3. Rowden, Jessica & Lloyd, David J.B. & Gilbert, Nigel, 2014. "A model of political voting behaviours across different countries," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 413(C), pages 609-625.
    4. Schweitzer, Frank & Zimmermann, Jörg & Mühlenbein, Heinz, 2002. "Coordination of decisions in a spatial agent model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 189-216.
    5. Pareschi, Lorenzo & Vellucci, Pierluigi & Zanella, Mattia, 2017. "Kinetic models of collective decision-making in the presence of equality bias," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 201-217.
    6. Itzhak Benenson & Erez Hatna & Ehud Or, 2009. "From Schelling to Spatially Explicit Modeling of Urban Ethnic and Economic Residential Dynamics," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 463-497, May.
    7. Gualandi, Stefano & Toscani, Giuseppe, 2019. "Size distribution of cities: A kinetic explanation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 221-234.
    8. Bian, Tian & Hu, Jiantao & Deng, Yong, 2017. "Identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on AHP," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 422-436.
    9. Du, Yuxian & Gao, Cai & Hu, Yong & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Deng, Yong, 2014. "A new method of identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on TOPSIS," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 57-69.
    10. Hyeong-Ohk Bae & Seung-Yeal Ha & Yongsik Kim & Hyuncheul Lim & Jane Yoo, 2020. "Volatility Flocking by Cucker–Smale Mechanism in Financial Markets," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 27(3), pages 387-414, September.
    11. Katarzyna Ostasiewicz & Michal H. Tyc & Piotr Goliczewski & Piotr Magnuszewski & Andrzej Radosz & Jan Sendzimir, 2006. "Integrating economic and psychological insights in binary choice models with social interactions," Papers physics/0609170, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Oliveira, A.C.S. & Martins, S.G.F. & Zacarias, M.S., 2013. "An individual-based model for the interaction of the mite Tetranychus urticae (Koch, 1836) with its predator Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor, 1954) (Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 11-20.
    2. Piotr Przybyła & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Rafał Weron, 2014. "Diffusion Of Innovation Within An Agent-Based Model: Spinsons, Independence And Advertising," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-22.
    3. Tiwari, Mukesh & Yang, Xiguang & Sen, Surajit, 2021. "Modeling the nonlinear effects of opinion kinematics in elections: A simple Ising model with random field based study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    4. Katarzyna Ostasiewicz & Michal H. Tyc & Piotr Goliczewski & Piotr Magnuszewski & Andrzej Radosz & Jan Sendzimir, 2006. "Integrating economic and psychological insights in binary choice models with social interactions," Papers physics/0609170, arXiv.org.
    5. AskariSichani, Omid & Jalili, Mahdi, 2015. "Influence maximization of informed agents in social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 254(C), pages 229-239.
    6. Baldassarri, Simone & Gallo, Anna & Jacquier, Vanessa & Zocca, Alessandro, 2023. "Ising model on clustered networks: A model for opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 623(C).
    7. Galam, Serge, 2004. "Sociophysics: a personal testimony," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 336(1), pages 49-55.
    8. Gary Mckeown & Noel Sheehy, 2006. "Mass Media and Polarisation Processes in the Bounded Confidence Model of Opinion Dynamics," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11.
    9. Boudin, Laurent & Mercier, Aurore & Salvarani, Francesco, 2012. "Conciliatory and contradictory dynamics in opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(22), pages 5672-5684.
    10. Juliette Rouchier & Emily Tanimura, 2012. "When overconfident agents slow down collective learning," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00623966, HAL.
    11. Hadzibeganovic, Tarik & Liu, Chao & Li, Rong, 2021. "Effects of reproductive skew on the evolution of ethnocentrism in structured populations with variable size," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 568(C).
    12. Keesen, Fabíola & Castro e Silva, Alcides & Pinheiro, Carlos Felipe S. & Arashiro, Everaldo & Ligeiro, Yan & Grelle, Carlos Eduardo de Viveiros, 2023. "New applications of an old individual-based model for biological dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    13. Juliette Rouchier & Emily Tanimura, 2012. "When overconfident agents slow down collective learning," Post-Print hal-00623966, HAL.
    14. Amac Herdagdelen & Haluk Bingol, 2007. "A Cultural Market Model," Papers 0707.2341, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2008.
    15. Carlos E. Laciana & Santiago L. Rovere, 2010. "Ising-like agent-based technology diffusion model: adoption patterns vs. seeding strategies," Papers 1011.3834, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2013.
    16. Andrés Chacoma & Damián H Zanette, 2015. "Opinion Formation by Social Influence: From Experiments to Modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Massari, Giovanni F. & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Carbone, Giuseppe, 2019. "Are distrust relationships beneficial for group performance? The influence of the scope of distrust on the emergence of collective intelligence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 343-355.
    18. Laciana, Carlos E. & Oteiza-Aguirre, Nicolás, 2014. "An agent based multi-optional model for the diffusion of innovations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 254-265.
    19. Fang Wu & Bernardo A. Huberman, 2004. "Social Structure and Opinion Formation," Computational Economics 0407002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Catherine A. Glass & David H. Glass, 2021. "Social Influence of Competing Groups and Leaders in Opinion Dynamics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 799-823, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:287:y:2000:i:3:p:644-659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.