IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v12y2024ics2214716024000046.html

Green retailer: A stochastic bi-level approach to support investment decisions in sustainable energy systems

Author

Listed:
  • Beraldi, Patrizia

Abstract

This paper presents a bi-level approach to support retailers in making investment decisions in renewable-based systems to provide clean electricity. The proposed model captures the strategic nature of the problem and combines capacity sizing decisions for installed technologies with pricing decisions regarding the electricity tariffs to offer to a reference end-user, representative of a class of residential prosumers. The interaction between retailer and end-user is modeled using the Stackelberg game framework, with the former acting as a leader and the latter as follower. The reaction of the follower to the electricity tariff affects the retailer’s profit, which is calculated as the difference between the revenue generated from selling electricity and the total investment, operation and management costs. To account for uncertainty in wholesale electricity prices, renewable resource availability and electricity request, the upper-level problem is formulated as a two-stage stochastic programming model. First-stage decisions refer to the sizing of installed technologies and electricity tariffs, whereas second-stage decisions refer to the operation and management of the designed system. The model also incorporates a safety measure to control the average profit that can be achieved in a given percentage of worst-case situations, thus providing a contingency against unforeseen changes. At the lower level, the follower reacts to the offered tariffs by defining the procurement plan in terms of energy to purchase from the retailer or potential competitors, with the final aim of minimizing the expected value of the electricity bill. A tailored approach that exploits the specific problem structure is designed to solve the proposed formulation and extensively tested on a realistic case study. The numerical results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach and validate the significance of explicitly dealing with the uncertainty and the importance of incorporating a safety measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Beraldi, Patrizia, 2024. "Green retailer: A stochastic bi-level approach to support investment decisions in sustainable energy systems," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:12:y:2024:i:c:s2214716024000046
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2024.100300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000046
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2024.100300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beraldi, Patrizia & Khodaparasti, Sara, 2023. "Designing electricity tariffs in the retail market: A stochastic bi-level approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    3. Wu, Di & Ma, Xu & Huang, Sen & Fu, Tao & Balducci, Patrick, 2020. "Stochastic optimal sizing of distributed energy resources for a cost-effective and resilient Microgrid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Oggioni, Giorgia & Schwartz, Alexandra & Wiertz, Ann-Kathrin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2024. "Dynamic pricing and strategic retailers in the energy sector: A multi-leader-follower approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 255-272.
    5. Jacquet, Quentin & van Ackooij, Wim & Alasseur, Clémence & Gaubert, Stéphane, 2024. "Quadratic regularization of bilevel pricing problems and application to electricity retail markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 841-857.
    6. Martin Weibelzahl & Alexandra Märtz, 2020. "Optimal storage and transmission investments in a bilevel electricity market model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 911-940, April.
    7. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    8. Anjos, Miguel F. & Brotcorne, Luce & Gomez-Herrera, Juan A., 2021. "Optimal setting of time-and-level-of-use prices for an electricity supplier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    9. S. Oliveira, Fernando & William-Rioux, Bertrand & Pierru, Axel, 2023. "Capacity expansion in liberalized electricity markets with locational pricing and renewable energy investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    10. Michael Bussieck & Alexander Meeraus, 2007. "Algebraic modeling for IP and MIP (GAMS)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 49-56, February.
    11. Grimm, Veronika & Rückel, Bastian & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2021. "The impact of market design on transmission and generation investment in electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Zugno, Marco & Morales, Juan Miguel & Pinson, Pierre & Madsen, Henrik, 2013. "A bilevel model for electricity retailers' participation in a demand response market environment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 182-197.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoniou, Margarita & Sinha, Ankur & Papa, Gregor, 2024. "δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beraldi, Patrizia & Khodaparasti, Sara, 2023. "Designing electricity tariffs in the retail market: A stochastic bi-level approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Julien Ancel, 2025. "Tariffs time-dynamics in competitive electricity retail markets with differentiated consumer reactions," Post-Print hal-05100663, HAL.
    3. Qi Zhang & Shaohua Zhang & Xian Wang & Xue Li & Lei Wu, 2020. "Conditional-Robust-Profit-Based Optimization Model for Electricity Retailers with Shiftable Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Ancel, Julien, 2025. "Tariffs time-dynamics in competitive electricity retail markets with differentiated consumer reactions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    6. M. Kaina & L. Rüschendorf, 2009. "On convex risk measures on L p -spaces," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(3), pages 475-495, July.
    7. Pu Huang & Dharmashankar Subramanian, 2012. "Iterative estimation maximization for stochastic linear programs with conditional value-at-risk constraints," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 441-458, November.
    8. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    9. Dominique Guégan & Wayne Tarrant, 2012. "On the necessity of five risk measures," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 533-552, November.
    10. Soren Bettels & Stefan Weber, 2024. "An Integrated Approach to Importance Sampling and Machine Learning for Efficient Monte Carlo Estimation of Distortion Risk Measures in Black Box Models," Papers 2408.02401, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    11. Julia Grübel & Richard Krug & Martin Schmidt & Winnifried Wollner, 2023. "A Successive Linear Relaxation Method for MINLPs with Multivariate Lipschitz Continuous Nonlinearities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 1077-1117, September.
    12. Giovanni Masala & Filippo Petroni, 2023. "Drawdown risk measures for asset portfolios with high frequency data," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 265-289, June.
    13. Young Kim & Rosella Giacometti & Svetlozar Rachev & Frank Fabozzi & Domenico Mignacca, 2012. "Measuring financial risk and portfolio optimization with a non-Gaussian multivariate model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 325-343, December.
    14. Ke Zhou & Jiangjun Gao & Duan Li & Xiangyu Cui, 2017. "Dynamic mean–VaR portfolio selection in continuous time," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(10), pages 1631-1643, October.
    15. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    16. Rostagno, Luciano Martin, 2005. "Empirical tests of parametric and non-parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measures for the Brazilian stock market index," ISU General Staff Papers 2005010108000021878, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    17. Andreas H Hamel, 2018. "Monetary Measures of Risk," Papers 1812.04354, arXiv.org.
    18. Steven Kou & Xianhua Peng, 2014. "On the Measurement of Economic Tail Risk," Papers 1401.4787, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    19. So Yeon Chun & Alexander Shapiro & Stan Uryasev, 2012. "Conditional Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk: Estimation and Asymptotics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 739-756, August.
    20. Sarah Yini Gao & David Simchi-Levi & Chung-Piaw Teo & Zhenzhen Yan, 2019. "Disruption Risk Mitigation in Supply Chains: The Risk Exposure Index Revisited," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 831-852, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:12:y:2024:i:c:s2214716024000046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.