IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v229y2025icp50-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ensemble feature selection via CoCoSo method extended to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment

Author

Listed:
  • Janani, K.
  • Mohanrasu, S.S.
  • Kashkynbayev, Ardak
  • Rakkiyappan, R.

Abstract

Feature selection is a crucial step in the process of preparing and refining data. By identifying and retaining only the most informative and discriminative features, one can achieve several benefits, including faster training times, reduced risk of overfitting, improved model generalization, and enhanced interpretability. Ensemble feature selection has demonstrated its efficacy in improving the stability and generalization performance of models and is particularly valuable in high-dimensional datasets and complex machine learning tasks, contributing to the creation of more accurate and robust predictive models. This article presents an innovative ensemble feature selection technique through the development of a unique Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model, incorporating both rank aggregation principles and a filter-based algorithm. The proposed MCDM model combines the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method and the Archimedean operator within interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments, effectively addressing the challenges of vagueness and imprecision in datasets. A customizable feature selection model is introduced, allowing users to define the number of features, employing a sigmoidal function with a tuning parameter for fuzzification. The assignment of entropy weights in the Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set (IVIFS) environment provides priorities to each column. The method’s effectiveness is assessed on real-world datasets, comparing it with existing approaches and validated through statistical tests such as the Friedman test and post-hoc Conover test, emphasizing its significance in comparison to current methodologies. Based on the results obtained, we inferred that our structured approach to ensemble feature selection, utilizing a specific case of the Archimedean operator, demonstrated superior performance across the datasets. This more generalized methodology enhances the robustness and effectiveness of feature selection by leveraging the strengths of the Archimedean operator, resulting in improved data analysis and model accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Janani, K. & Mohanrasu, S.S. & Kashkynbayev, Ardak & Rakkiyappan, R., 2025. "Ensemble feature selection via CoCoSo method extended to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 50-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:229:y:2025:i:c:p:50-77
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2024.09.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475424003781
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2024.09.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Hongbo & Qin, Xiwen & Gao, Xueliang & Zhang, Siqi & Tian, Yunsheng & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Improved salp swarm algorithm based on Newton interpolation and cosine opposition-based learning for feature selection," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 544-558.
    2. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    3. Liu, Fang & Chen, Ya-Ru & Zhou, Da-Hai, 2023. "A two-dimensional approach to flexibility degree of XOR numbers with application to group decision making," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 267-287.
    4. Yu, Xiaobing & Wang, Haoyu & Lu, Yangchen, 2024. "An adaptive ranking moth flame optimizer for feature selection," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 164-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S., Kavitha & N., Kendra & J., Satheeshkumar & T., Amudha & Manavalan, Balachandran, 2025. "Decision making based ensemble feature selection approach through a new score function in q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy environment," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 362-381.
    2. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud, 2023. "Evaluating the risks of the internet of things in renewable energy systems using a hybrid fuzzy decision approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Kavitha, S. & Satheeshkumar, J. & Amudha, T., 2024. "Multi-label feature selection using q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach extended to CODAS," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 148-173.
    5. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud & Hosseini Bamakan, Seyed Mojtaba, 2024. "Evaluating the blockchain technology strategies for reducing renewable energy development risks using a novel integrated decision framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    6. Jameel, Toqeer & Riaz, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "Sustainable renewable energy systems with entropy based step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis and combined compromise solution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Nitasha Hasteer & Rahul Sindhwani & Abhishek Behl & Akul Varshney & Adityansh Sharma, 2024. "Exploring the inhibitors for competitive AI software development through cloud driven transformation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 355-397, November.
    8. Zhou, Weijie & Feng, Hanrui & Guo, Zeyu & Jia, Huating & Li, Yue & Luo, Xinyue & Ran, Siwei & Zhang, Hanming & Zhou, Ziyu & Yuan, Jiakai & Liu, Jiaxin & Sun, Shijie & Chen, Faan, 2024. "Machine learning embedded hybrid MCDM model to mitigate decision uncertainty in transport safety planning for OAS countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Zhi Wen & Huchang Liao & Ruxue Ren & Chunguang Bai & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Abdullah Al-Barakati, 2019. "Cold Chain Logistics Management of Medicine with an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Moslem, Sarbast & Gholamizadeh, Kamran & Zarei, Esmaeil & Pasman, Hans J & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz & Pilla, Francesco, 2025. "A comparative assessment of domino accident analysis methods in process industries using LMAW and DNMA techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Mehmet Ozcalici, 2023. "Integrating queue theory and multi-criteria decision-making tools for selecting roll-over car washing machine," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(2), pages 99-119.
    12. Željko Stević & Dillip Kumar Das & Rade Tešić & Marijo Vidas & Dragan Vojinović, 2022. "Objective Criticism and Negative Conclusions on Using the Fuzzy SWARA Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Sood, Kirti & Singh, Simarjeet & Behl, Abhishek & Sindhwani, Rahul & Kaur, Sandeepa & Pereira, Vijay, 2023. "Identification and prioritization of the risks in the mass adoption of artificial intelligence-driven stable coins: The quest for optimal resource utilization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Liao, Huchang & Li, Xiaofang, 2025. "A multi-criterion decision making method for renewable energy storage technology selection with incomplete evaluation information," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2023. "A Novel Integrated q-Rung Fuzzy Framework for Biomass Location Selection with No Apriori Weight Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin & Firoozabadi, Bahar, 2025. "Solar heating as sustainable solution in dyeing industries: A compromise solution approach integrated machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    17. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Cui, Yongfeng & Liu, Wei & Rani, Pratibha & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Nadine Kafa & Anicia Jaegler & Joseph Sarkis, 2020. "Harnessing Corporate Sustainability Decision-Making Complexity: A Field Study of Complementary Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Nhieu, Nhat-Luong & Dang, Tri Dung, 2024. "Harnessing Vietnam's coastal potential: Prioritizing marine energy technologies with an objectively weighting decision-making approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:229:y:2025:i:c:p:50-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.