IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v51y2015icp182-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding solutions for the styrofoam buoy debris problem through participatory workshops

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Jongmyoung
  • Hong, Sunwook
  • Jang, Yong Chang
  • Lee, Mi Jeong
  • Kang, Daeseok
  • Shim, Won Joon

Abstract

Styrofoam buoys are the most abundant marine debris item in the coastal areas of South Korea. Participatory workshops to find solutions to the Styrofoam buoy marine debris problem were held in 2011–2012. Policy ideas were created through brainstorming sessions and were discussed in 2011. These policy ideas were depicted on a conceptual model and a results chain framework was further refined in 2012. Some of the policy alternatives developed in these processes, such as ‘increasing obligatory retrieval of old buoys in exchange of subsidy for high-density Styrofoam buoys׳, were adopted as national governmental policy. Participatory workshops were effective in developing policy measures on marine debris, especially when various stakeholders were involved in the discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Jongmyoung & Hong, Sunwook & Jang, Yong Chang & Lee, Mi Jeong & Kang, Daeseok & Shim, Won Joon, 2015. "Finding solutions for the styrofoam buoy debris problem through participatory workshops," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 182-189.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:182-189
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X14002243
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hastings, Emily & Potts, Tavis, 2013. "Marine litter: Progress in developing an integrated policy approach in Scotland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 49-55.
    2. Curtin, Richard & Prellezo, Raúl, 2010. "Understanding marine ecosystem based management: A literature review," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 821-830, September.
    3. Woodhatch, Libby & Crean, Kevin, 1999. "The gentleman's agreements: a fisheries management case study from the Southwest of England," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 25-35, January.
    4. James S. Pounder, 2000. "Examining the competing values framework in a higher educational context: implications of a Hong Kong study," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 103-119.
    5. Margoluis, Richard & Stem, Caroline & Salafsky, Nick & Brown, Marcia, 2009. "Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 138-147, May.
    6. Brown, James & Macfadyen, Graeme, 2007. "Ghost fishing in European waters: Impacts and management responses," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 488-504, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atheer Abdullah Mohammed & Abdul Hafeez-Baig & Raj Gururajan, 2018. "Exploring Processes that are Used for Managing Knowledge in theHigher Education Environment: A Case Study in a Queensland Regional University," International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs (IJBEA), Sana N. Maswadeh, vol. 3(2), pages 73-90.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corrado Battisti, 2018. "Preparing students for the operational environmental career: an integrated project-based road map for academic programs," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 573-583, December.
    2. Merrie, Andrew & Olsson, Per, 2014. "An innovation and agency perspective on the emergence and spread of Marine Spatial Planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 366-374.
    3. Gilman, Eric, 2015. "Status of international monitoring and management of abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear and ghost fishing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 225-239.
    4. Peter Arbo & Thuy Pham Thi Thanh, 2014. "The missing link in marine ecosystem-based management," ERSA conference papers ersa14p248, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Bailey, Jennifer, 2016. "Adventures in cross-disciplinary studies: Grand strategy and fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 18-27.
    6. Sean Pascoe & Renae Tobin & Jill Windle & Toni Cannard & Nadine Marshall & Zobaidul Kabir & Nicole Flint, 2016. "Developing a Social, Cultural and Economic Report Card for a Regional Industrial Harbour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Brandon Kuczenski & Camila Vargas Poulsen & Eric L. Gilman & Michael Musyl & Bri Winkler & Roland Geyer, 2022. "A model for the intensity of fishing gear," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1847-1857, December.
    8. Gippoliti, Spartaco & Battisti, Corrado, 2017. "More cool than tool: Equivoques, conceptual traps and weaknesses of ecological networks in environmental planning and conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 686-691.
    9. Grafton, R. Quentin & Squires, Dale & Steinshamn, Stein Ivar, 2023. "Towards resilience-based management of marine capture fisheries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 231-238.
    10. Øistein Harsem & Alf Hoel, 2013. "Climate change and adaptive capacity in fisheries management: the case of Norway," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-63, March.
    11. Willsteed, Edward A. & Jude, Simon & Gill, Andrew B. & Birchenough, Silvana N.R., 2018. "Obligations and aspirations: A critical evaluation of offshore wind farm cumulative impact assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2332-2345.
    12. Röckmann, Christine & van Leeuwen, Judith & Goldsborough, David & Kraan, Marloes & Piet, Gerjan, 2015. "The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 155-162.
    13. Foote, J. & Midgley, G. & Ahuriri-Driscoll, A. & Hepi, M. & Earl-Goulet, J., 2021. "Systemic evaluation of community environmental management programmes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 207-224.
    14. Matthew Osborne & Emma Sundström & Örjan Bodin, 2019. "Ecological interdependencies and resource competition: The role of information and communication in promoting effective collaboration in complex management situations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Brennan, Jonathon & Fitzsimmons, Clare & Gray, Tim & Raggatt, Laura, 2014. "EU marine strategy framework directive (MSFD) and marine spatial planning (MSP): Which is the more dominant and practicable contributor to maritime policy in the UK?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 359-366.
    16. Sander Van den Burg & Marian Stuiver & Jenny Norrman & Rita Garção & Tore Söderqvist & Christine Röckmann & Jan-Joost Schouten & Ole Petersen & Raul Guanche García & Pedro Diaz-Simal & Mark De Bel & L, 2016. "Participatory Design of Multi-Use Platforms at Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    17. van Leeuwen, Judith & Raakjaer, Jesper & van Hoof, Luc & van Tatenhove, Jan & Long, Ronán & Ounanian, Kristen, 2014. "Implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: A policy perspective on regulatory, institutional and stakeholder impediments to effective implementation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 325-330.
    18. Jane L. Harrison & Alexandra Naumenko & John C. Whitehead, 2021. "Attribute Nonattendance And Citizen Preferences For Ecosystem‐Based Fisheries Management: The Case Of Atlantic Menhaden," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 310-324, April.
    19. Carmona, Itsaso & Ansuategi, Alberto & Chamorro, José Manuel & Escapa, Marta & Gallastegui, María Carmen & Murillas, Arantza & Prellezo, Raúl, 2020. "Measuring the value of ecosystem-based fishery management using financial portfolio theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Selden, Rebecca L. & Valencia, Sarah R. & Larsen, Ashley E. & Cornejo-Donoso, Jorge & Wasserman, Amanda A., 2016. "Evaluating seafood eco-labeling as a mechanism to reduce collateral impacts of fisheries in an ecosystem-based fisheries management context," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 102-115.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:182-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.