IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v31y2007i4p488-504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ghost fishing in European waters: Impacts and management responses

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, James
  • Macfadyen, Graeme

Abstract

In this paper we review levels of net loss, what happens to the gear once it has been lost, and the resulting levels of 'ghost catches' made in passive net fisheries in the EU. We also consider ghost catches resulting from lost gear in other types of fisheries, and the extent to which the value of ghost catches has been quantified. We consider why fishing gear is lost, and profile common management responses. We present a cost benefit model to assess the relative cost effectiveness of different management measures, and suggest that gear retrieval programmes may provide less value for money than other management responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, James & Macfadyen, Graeme, 2007. "Ghost fishing in European waters: Impacts and management responses," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 488-504, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:31:y:2007:i:4:p:488-504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(07)00002-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Jongmyoung & Hong, Sunwook & Jang, Yong Chang & Lee, Mi Jeong & Kang, Daeseok & Shim, Won Joon, 2015. "Finding solutions for the styrofoam buoy debris problem through participatory workshops," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 182-189.
    2. Gilman, Eric, 2015. "Status of international monitoring and management of abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear and ghost fishing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 225-239.
    3. Brandon Kuczenski & Camila Vargas Poulsen & Eric L. Gilman & Michael Musyl & Bri Winkler & Roland Geyer, 2022. "A model for the intensity of fishing gear," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1847-1857, December.
    4. Liu, Ta-Kang & Kao, Jui-Chuang & Chen, Ping, 2015. "Tragedy of the unwanted commons: Governing the marine debris in Taiwan’s oyster farming," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 123-130.
    5. Paritosh C. Deshpande & Cecilia Haskins, 2021. "Application of Systems Engineering and Sustainable Development Goals towards Sustainable Management of Fishing Gear Resources in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:31:y:2007:i:4:p:488-504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.