IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v89y2019ics0264837718318544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The drivers behind nature conservation cost

Author

Listed:
  • Lehrer, David
  • Becker, Nir
  • Bar, Pua

Abstract

In order to estimate the financial resources needed to adequately fund measures to protect nature both worldwide and country by country, a number of models have been proposed that attempt to predict the variation in management costs of protected areas (PAs). Other than the size of a PA, there is no consensus among the studies of what other variables impact budget decision making. In this study, the budgets for the four districts of the Israel Nature and Parks Authority (INPA), the main government agency responsible for nature conservation in Israel, were split into 37 ranger areas. The ranger areas were compared according to geophysical and ecological attributes to determine whether size or any other variable could be linked to budget size. This study’s aim is to propose a conservation cost function that will enable us to objectively predict conservation costs based on PA attributes. Predicted costs can then be compared to actual budgets to determine whether there is a gap in funding. This method can be adapted to other regions based on incorporating the characteristics specific to that region. Using linear regression, a model that included the total size of reserves (PA) in a ranger area, the number of reserves in a ranger area, and tourism’s impact was the best fit (r2 = 0.74). Surprisingly, as opposed to other studies on conservation costs, PA size had a negative impact, meaning conservation costs rose the smaller the reserve size within a ranger area. On the other hand, the number of reserves in a PA and the level of tourism both had positive impacts on budget size. This indicates the higher costs of managing multiple small reserves and protecting nature while accommodating the public. Other biological indicators appeared to have no impact on budgets, which in itself may indicate budget considerations beyond conservation objectives. This study’s uniqueness lies in the use of a wide range of variables to try to determine which are predictors of conservation costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Lehrer, David & Becker, Nir & Bar, Pua, 2019. "The drivers behind nature conservation cost," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:89:y:2019:i:c:s0264837718318544
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718318544
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Azzoni, Carlos R. & Isai, Joao Y., 1994. "Estimating the costs of environmental protection in Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 127-133, November.
    2. Sabrina J. Lovell & David L. Sunding, 2001. "Voluntary Development Restrictions and the Cost of Habitat Conservation," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 191-206.
    3. Ferraro, Paul J., 2002. "The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 261-275, December.
    4. Wu, Jian & Gong, Yazhen & Wu, JunJie, 2018. "Spatial distribution of nature reserves in China: Driving forces in the past and conservation challenges in the future," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 31-42.
    5. Carly Golodets & Marcelo Sternberg & Jaime Kigel & Bertrand Boeken & Zalmen Henkin & No’am Seligman & Eugene Ungar, 2013. "From desert to Mediterranean rangelands: will increasing drought and inter-annual rainfall variability affect herbaceous annual primary productivity?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 785-798, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silva, José Maria Cardoso da & Dias, Teresa Cristina Albuquerque de Castro & Cunha, Alan Cavalcanti da & Cunha, Helenilza Ferreira Albuquerque, 2021. "Funding deficits of protected areas in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sims, Katharine R.E., 2010. "Conservation and development: Evidence from Thai protected areas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 94-114, September.
    2. Ferraro, Paul J., 2002. "The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 261-275, December.
    3. Desbureaux, Sébastien & Brimont, Laura, 2015. "Between economic loss and social identity: The multi-dimensional cost of avoiding deforestation in Eastern Madagascar," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 10-20.
    4. Mojo, D. & Oduor, A.M.O. & Fu, C. & Bai, Y. & Long, H. & Wang, G. & Zhang, L., 2018. "The effects of protected areas on the welfare of local communities: the case of Maasai Mara National Reserve in Kenya," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276956, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Vanessa M Adams & Daniel B Segan & Robert L Pressey, 2011. "How Much Does it Cost to Expand a Protected Area System? Some Critical Determining Factors and Ranges of Costs for Queensland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Rasolofoson, Ranaivo A. & Nielsen, Martin R. & Jones, Julia P.G., 2018. "The potential of the Global Person Generated Index for evaluating the perceived impacts of conservation interventions on subjective well-being," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 107-118.
    7. Sayuni B. Mariki, 2013. "Conservation With a Human Face? Comparing Local Participation and Benefit Sharing From a National Park and a State Forest Plantation in Tanzania," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, November.
    8. Moser, Christine M., 2014. "Voter Response to Conservation Policies in Madagascar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 93-103.
    9. Bridget Bwalya & Promise Chenjelani Zulu, 2023. "Old Wine in New Skins? Community Markets for Conservation and its Performance in Northern Zambia," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    10. Zhifeng Zhang & Yuping Tang & Hongyi Pan & Caiyi Yao & Tianyi Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Sebastien DESBUREAUX & Eric Nazindigouba KERE & Pascale COMBES MOTEL, 2016. "Impact Evaluation in a Landscape: Protected Natural Forests, Anthropized Forested Lands and Deforestation Leakages in Madagascar's Rainforests," Working Papers 201613, CERDI.
    12. Feng, Dingrao & Bao, Wenkai & Yang, Yuanyuan & Fu, Meichen, 2021. "How do government policies promote greening? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Gongxin Wang & Changqing Jing & Ping Dong & Baoya Qin & Yang Cheng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Aboveground Biomass and Its Influencing Factors in Xinjiang’s Desert Grasslands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Albers, Heidi J. & Robinson, Elizabeth J.Z., 2007. "Spatial-temporal aspects of cost-benefit analysis for park management: An example from Khao Yai National Park, Thailand," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 129-150, August.
    15. David Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Remedios Larrubia Vargas, 2022. "Protected Areas and Rural Depopulation in Spain: A Multi-Stakeholder Perceptual Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Elizabeth J. Z. Robinson & Heidi J. Albers & Charles Meshack & Razack B. Lokina, 2013. "Implementing REDD through community‐based forest management: Lessons from Tanzania," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(3), pages 141-152, August.
    17. Erin McCreless & Piero Visconti & Josie Carwardine & Chris Wilcox & Robert J Smith, 2013. "Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-1, November.
    18. Alexander M. Danzer & Lennard Zyska, 2023. "Pensions and Fertility: Microeconomic Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 126-165, May.
    19. Fust, Pascal & Schlecht, Eva, 2022. "Importance of timing: Vulnerability of semi-arid rangeland systems to increased variability in temporal distribution of rainfall events as predicted by future climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    20. Coria, Jessica & Robinson, Elizabeth & Smith, Henrik G. & Sterner, Thomas, 2012. "Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Services Provision: Tale of Confused Objectives, Multiple Market Failures and Policy Challenges," Working Papers in Economics 546, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:89:y:2019:i:c:s0264837718318544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.