IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v69y2017icp427-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring residential and industrial land use mix in the peri-urban areas of China

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Li
  • Liang, Yinlong
  • Zhang, Bo

Abstract

While the mix of residential, commercial and recreational use has been desirable for a compact city model, the mix of residential and industrial land use has long been regarded as being negative on the living environment. The peri-urban area of China is characterized by an intermingling of industries with residential land, which poses threats on a sustainable environment. In China, planners tend to criticize the mix of residential and industrial land, but lack a method to quantify the degree to which industrial and residential land is mixed, and are unable to clarify its environmental influence. This research develops an index method (MDI) to measure the mixed degree of residential and industrial land. By taking three peri-urban areas of China as cases, this research explores how this index can be applied to measure the spatial changes of land use mix, and explains the factors leading to this type of mix. It concludes with the implications of environmental impacts of MDI and its inclusion in land use planning and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Li & Liang, Yinlong & Zhang, Bo, 2017. "Measuring residential and industrial land use mix in the peri-urban areas of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 427-438.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:427-438
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717306579
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Tian, 2008. "The Chengzhongcun Land Market in China: Boon or Bane? — A Perspective on Property Rights," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 282-304, June.
    2. Song, Yan & Knaap, Gerrit-Jan, 2004. "Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 663-680, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xing Su & Zhu Qian, 2020. "State Intervention in Land Supply and Its Impact on Real Estate Investment in China: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Liu Liu & Huang Huang & Jiaxin Qi, 2024. "Towards a Multi-Scale Effect of Land Mixed Use on Resident Population—A Novel Explanatory Framework of Interactive Spatial Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Yuning Wang & Duanfang Lu & David Levinson, 2023. "Equilibrium or imbalance? Rail Transit and Land Use Mix in Station Areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2403-2421, December.
    4. Fahad Ahmed Shaikh & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Saima Kalwar, 2022. "Factors Influencing Residential Location Choice towards Mixed Land-Use Development: An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Yishao Shi & Bo Zheng & Zhu Wang & Jianwen Zheng, 2023. "Mixed Land Use and Its Relationship with CO 2 Emissions: A Comparative Analysis Based on Several Typical Development Zones in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Zhe Cheng & Tianyu Zhao & Tao Song & Li Cui & Xinfa Zhou, 2022. "Assessing the Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Development Characteristics of Regional Ecological Resources for Sustainable Development: A Case Study on Guizhou Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Jiacheng Jiao & John Rollo & Baibai Fu, 2021. "The Hidden Characteristics of Land-Use Mix Indices: An Overview and Validity Analysis Based on the Land Use in Melbourne, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Arturas Kaklauskas & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Natalija Lepkova & Saulius Raslanas & Kestutis Dauksys & Ingrida Vetloviene & Ieva Ubarte, 2021. "Sustainable Construction Investment, Real Estate Development, and COVID-19: A Review of Literature in the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-42, July.
    9. Yuefei Zhuo & Xin Jing & Xiaoying Wang & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yang Chen & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Rise and Fall of Land Use Mix: Review and Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Lang, Wei & Long, Ying & Chen, Tingting, 2018. "Rediscovering Chinese cities through the lens of land-use patterns," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 362-374.
    11. Meiling He & Jiaren Shen & Xiaohui Wu & Jianqiang Luo, 2018. "Logistics Space: A Literature Review from the Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Motieyan, Hamid & Azmoodeh, Mohammad, 2021. "Mixed-use distribution index: A novel bilevel measure to address urban land-use mix pattern (A case study in Tehran, Iran)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. George Grekousis & Zhuolin Pan & Ye Liu, 2021. "Do Neighborhoods with Highly Diverse Built Environment Exhibit Different Socio-Economic Profiles as Well? Evidence from Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Hongyu Zheng & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Jianhong Huang & Qi Fu, 2021. "Measuring and characterizing land use mix patterns of China’s megacities: A case study of Shanghai," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2509-2539, December.
    15. Lianma Zhang & Dazhuan Ge & Pan Sun & Dongqi Sun, 2021. "The Transition Mechanism and Revitalization Path of Rural Industrial Land from a Spatial Governance Perspective: The Case of Shunde District, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Hachem-Vermette, Caroline & Grewal, Kuljeet Singh, 2019. "Investigation of the impact of residential mixture on energy and environmental performance of mixed use neighborhoods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 362-379.
    17. Zhuoma Garang & Cifang Wu & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Non-Stationarity and Its Influencing Factors of Commercial Land Price: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Peng Wang & Zinan Shao & Jian Wang & Qun Wu, 2021. "The impact of land finance on urban land use efficiency: A panel threshold model for Chinese provinces," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 310-331, March.
    19. Alessia Iannillo & Isidoro Fasolino, 2021. "Land-Use Mix and Urban Sustainability: Benefits and Indicators Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Hu, Yucong & Cao, Jiangyu & Liu, Jianrong, 2021. "Influence of bus stop land use characteristics on passenger waiting time satisfaction ‐ A case study in Guangzhou," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Credit & Elizabeth Mack, 2019. "Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 264-285, February.
    2. Hans R.A. Koster & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "The Impact Of Mixed Land Use On Residential Property Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 733-761, December.
    3. Mejia-Dorantes, Lucia & Lucas, Karen, 2014. "Public transport investment and local regeneration: A comparison of London׳s Jubilee Line Extension and the Madrid Metrosur," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 241-252.
    4. Yingjie Zhang & Siqi Zheng & Yan Song & Yongguang Zhong, 2016. "The Spillover Effect of Urban Village Removal on Nearby Home Values in Beijing," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 9-31, March.
    5. Dinghuan Yuan & Yung Yau & Haijun Bao & Yongshen Liu & Ting Liu, 2019. "Anatomizing the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment: Case Studies in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Paul Besseling & Jos Ebregt & Rafael Saitua & Ioulia Ossokina, 2005. "Multifunctional land use in the Amsterdam South Axis area - a cost-benefit analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa05p409, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Yoo, James, 2021. "The Capitalized Value of Outlet Renovation - comparison of quasi-experimental and matching approaches," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314015, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Cheshire, Paul, 2009. "Urban land markets and policy failures," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30837, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Prüser, Jan & Schmidt, Torsten, 2021. "Regional composition of national house price cycles in the US," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Development, Inequality and Urban Villages in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 885-889, December.
    11. Hee Jin Yang & Jihoon Song & Mack Joong Choi, 2016. "Measuring the Externality Effects of Commercial Land Use on Residential Land Value: A Case Study of Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Jieming Zhu, 2013. "Governance over Land Development during Rapid Urbanization under Institutional Uncertainty, with Reference to Periurbanization in Guangzhou Metropolitan Region, China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 257-275, April.
    13. Ha Na Im & Chang Gyu Choi, 2019. "The hidden side of the entropy-based land-use mix index: Clarifying the relationship between pedestrian volume and land-use mix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1865-1881, July.
    14. repec:cep:sticas:/163 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Zhiyong Yi & Guiwen Liu & Wei Lang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek, 2017. "Strategic Approaches to Sustainable Urban Renewal in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Hongyu Zheng & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Jianhong Huang & Qi Fu, 2021. "Measuring and characterizing land use mix patterns of China’s megacities: A case study of Shanghai," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2509-2539, December.
    17. Ye Liu & Zhigang Li & Yuqi Liu & Hongsheng Chen, 2015. "Growth of rural migrant enclaves in Guangzhou, China: Agency, everyday practice and social mobility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(16), pages 3086-3105, December.
    18. Yue Wu & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Formal and Informal Planning-Dominated Urban Village Development: A Comparative Study of Luojiazhuang and Yangjiapailou in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Thomas de Graaff & Henri L F de Groot & Caroline A Rodenburg & Erik T Verhoef, 2007. "The WTP for Facilities at the Amsterdam Zuidas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(9), pages 2099-2118, September.
    20. Eddie Chi Man Hui & Ka Hung Yu & Yinchuan Ye, 2014. "Housing Preferences of Temporary Migrants in Urban China in the wake of Gradual Hukou Reform: A Case Study of Shenzhen," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1384-1398, July.
    21. Yuning Wang & Duanfang Lu & David Levinson, 2023. "Equilibrium or imbalance? Rail Transit and Land Use Mix in Station Areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2403-2421, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:427-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.