IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2154-d1540948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Detailed Planning from Functional Mix Perspective with Spatial Analysis and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression: A Case Study in Shanghai Central Region

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Liu

    (Department of Urban Planning, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Key Laboratory of Spatial Intelligent Planning Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Huang Huang

    (Department of Urban Planning, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Key Laboratory of Ecology and Energy Saving Study of Dense Habitat, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jiali Yang

    (Department of Urban Planning, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Detailed spatial planning serves as statutory guidance for regulating specific spatial functions, including public services, living conditions, and production spaces. It emphasizes meeting the comprehensive needs of the local population, making it crucial to understand the relationship between population distribution and the mix of various city functions, particularly in the era of urban regeneration. Therefore, this study utilized point-of-interest (POI) data representing land functions and population data to investigate these relationships via spatial analysis and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR). Applied to the central urban area of Shanghai, the study reveals that the level of mixed land use and various functionalities affect population distribution at different adaptive scales. We also found a higher degree of functional mix does not always meet population needs. Although generally there is a positive correlation between functional mix and population distribution, they are not always closely bonded. The proposed method provides an efficient workflow for identifying the applicable scale of various functions to increase functional mix and attract the population, which can provide real-time evidence supporting detailed planning. Test results also reveal the less-considered space along the boundaries of administrative districts. We also found developing tools for detailed planning is an urgent need to facilitate cross-boundary cooperation and development, especially in the context of urban regeneration where they always are overlooked at the detailed planning level. By using open-sourced POI and population data, our proposed workflow can be easily applied to other cities or regions, enhancing their practical value for similar research contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Liu & Huang Huang & Jiali Yang, 2024. "Enhancing Detailed Planning from Functional Mix Perspective with Spatial Analysis and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression: A Case Study in Shanghai Central Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2154-:d:1540948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tian, Li & Liang, Yinlong & Zhang, Bo, 2017. "Measuring residential and industrial land use mix in the peri-urban areas of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 427-438.
    2. Kim Dovey & Elek Pafka, 2017. "What is functional mix? An assemblage approach," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 249-267, April.
    3. Hong Jiang & Weiting Xiong, 2024. "The Impact of Land-Use Mix on Technological Innovation: Evidence from a Grid-Cell-Level Analysis of Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. O’Driscoll, Conor & Crowley, Frank & Doran, Justin & McCarthy, Nóirín, 2023. "Land-use mixing in Irish cities: Implications for sustainable development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianwei Li & Yun Chen & Dan Zhao & Jiagang Zhai, 2024. "The Impact of Built Environment on Mixed Land Use: Evidence from Xi’an," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Liu Liu & Huang Huang & Jiaxin Qi, 2024. "Towards a Multi-Scale Effect of Land Mixed Use on Resident Population—A Novel Explanatory Framework of Interactive Spatial Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Son Hoang Nguyen & Dan Ngoc Nguyen & Nhung Nguyen Thu & Hai Hoang Pham & Hang Anh Phan & Cham Dinh Dao, 2023. "Current Soil Degradation Assessment in the Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam, by Multi-Criteria Analysis and GIS Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Wenli Dong & Xinyue Gao & Xiaowei Chen & Lihan Lin, 2023. "Industrial Park Renovation Strategy in a Poverty-Alleviated County Based on Inefficient Land Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Hongyu Zheng & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Jianhong Huang & Qi Fu, 2021. "Measuring and characterizing land use mix patterns of China’s megacities: A case study of Shanghai," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2509-2539, December.
    6. Yuning Wang & Duanfang Lu & David Levinson, 2023. "Equilibrium or imbalance? Rail Transit and Land Use Mix in Station Areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2403-2421, December.
    7. Yishao Shi & Bo Zheng & Zhu Wang & Jianwen Zheng, 2023. "Mixed Land Use and Its Relationship with CO 2 Emissions: A Comparative Analysis Based on Several Typical Development Zones in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Hong Jiang & Weiting Xiong, 2024. "The Impact of Land-Use Mix on Technological Innovation: Evidence from a Grid-Cell-Level Analysis of Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    9. George Grekousis & Zhuolin Pan & Ye Liu, 2021. "Do Neighborhoods with Highly Diverse Built Environment Exhibit Different Socio-Economic Profiles as Well? Evidence from Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Carles Crosas & Eulàlia Gómez-Escoda & Enric Villavieja, 2024. "Interplay between Land Use Planning and Functional Mix Dimensions: An Assemblage Approach for Metropolitan Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Xing Su & Zhu Qian, 2020. "State Intervention in Land Supply and Its Impact on Real Estate Investment in China: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Motieyan, Hamid & Azmoodeh, Mohammad, 2021. "Mixed-use distribution index: A novel bilevel measure to address urban land-use mix pattern (A case study in Tehran, Iran)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Credit, Kevin & O'Driscoll, Conor, 2024. "Assessing modal tradeoffs and associated built environment characteristics using a cost-distance framework," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Xuanxuan Xia & Kexin Lin & Yang Ding & Xianlei Dong & Huijun Sun & Beibei Hu, 2020. "Research on the Coupling Coordination Relationships between Urban Function Mixing Degree and Urbanization Development Level Based on Information Entropy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Jiacheng Jiao & John Rollo & Baibai Fu, 2021. "The Hidden Characteristics of Land-Use Mix Indices: An Overview and Validity Analysis Based on the Land Use in Melbourne, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Hu, Qiyu & Shen, Wencang & Yan, Jinming & Kong, Weilong & Li, Wei & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2024. "Does existing mixed land development promote the urban spatial composite function? Evidence from Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Lang, Wei & Long, Ying & Chen, Tingting, 2018. "Rediscovering Chinese cities through the lens of land-use patterns," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 362-374.
    18. Gerhard JB Bruyns & Christopher D Higgins & Darren H Nel, 2021. "Urban volumetrics: From vertical to volumetric urbanisation and its extensions to empirical morphological analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(5), pages 922-940, April.
    19. Likun Wu & Wei Lang & Tingting Chen, 2024. "Deciphering Urban Land Use Patterns in the Shenzhen–Dongguan Cross-Boundary Region Based on Multisource Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Kim Dovey & Elek Pafka, 2020. "What is walkability? The urban DMA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 93-108, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2154-:d:1540948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.