IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v169y2026ics0264837726002103.html

Quantify the spatial transfer effect of carbon emissions induced by non-grain conversion of cultivated land use in China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Shengming
  • Qian, Long
  • Li, Fuduo

Abstract

China is witnessing a pronounced trend in non-grain conversion of cultivated land use (NGCCL), which impacts local food systems’ carbon footprint and induces carbon leakage through altering food supply chains and triggering off-site production compensation. Regrettably, few studies have systematically explored this critical issue. This study therefore developed a novel framework to examine NGCCL’s local effects and spatial spillovers on food system carbon emissions (FCE) from crop production substitution perspectives. A significant trend was first observed with both NGCCL and FCE generally increasing where NGCCL rose rapidly in the south and slightly declined in the north, while FCE exhibited an inverse spatial distribution. Empirical results indicated that a 1% increase in local NGCCL led to a 0.782% decrease in local FCE and a 1.410% increase in off-site FCE, resulting in a net 0.628% increase in national FCE, validating NGCCL’s carbon leakage effect characterized by “local emission reduction and off-site emission increase”. Mechanism tests showed that the spatial spillover of FCE from local NGCCL was primarily transmitted through increased irrigation area and agricultural mechanization in regions responsible for grain production compensation. Moreover, the cross-regional impact of NGCCL on FCE exhibited complex spatial heterogeneity, with the carbon leakage significantly higher in northern regions than in southern regions, and that in major grain-producing regions was found to be smaller than that in non-major grain-producing regions. By illuminating the hidden spatial carbon trade-offs embedded in agricultural land-use transitions, this study provides a critical empirical foundation for designing cross-regional collaborative governance strategies that reconcile China’s dual goals of food security and carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Shengming & Qian, Long & Li, Fuduo, 2026. "Quantify the spatial transfer effect of carbon emissions induced by non-grain conversion of cultivated land use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002103
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726002103
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Yumeng & Liu, Yu, 2024. "Impact of fertilizer and pesticide reductions on land use in China based on crop-land integrated model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Gao, Siqi & Cuffey, Joel & Li, Gucheng & Li, Wenying, 2024. "Diet in China during substantial economic growth: Quality, inequality, trends, and determinants," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Kimberly M. Carlson & James S. Gerber & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Mario Herrero & Graham K. MacDonald & Kate A. Brauman & Petr Havlik & Christine S. O’Connell & Justin A. Johnson & Sassan Saatchi & Paul , 2017. "Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 63-68, January.
    4. Stephanie Roe & Charlotte Streck & Michael Obersteiner & Stefan Frank & Bronson Griscom & Laurent Drouet & Oliver Fricko & Mykola Gusti & Nancy Harris & Tomoko Hasegawa & Zeke Hausfather & Petr Havlík, 2019. "Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(11), pages 817-828, November.
    5. Fang, Dan & Chen, Jiangqiang & Wang, Saige & Chen, Bin, 2024. "Can agricultural mechanization enhance the climate resilience of food production? Evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    6. Peter Richards, 2015. "What Drives Indirect Land Use Change? How Brazil's Agriculture Sector Influences Frontier Deforestation," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(5), pages 1026-1040, September.
    7. Searchinger, Timothy & Heimlich, Ralph & Houghton, R. A. & Dong, Fengxia & Elobeid, Amani & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Tokgoz, Simla & Hayes, Dermot J. & Yu, Hun-Hsiang, 2008. "Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12881, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Jingxiu Qin & Weili Duan & Shan Zou & Yaning Chen & Wenjing Huang & Lorenzo Rosa, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Global energy use and carbon emissions from irrigated agriculture," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Wang, Jieyong & Zhang, Ziwen & Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Spatial shifts in grain production increases in China and implications for food security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 204-213.
    10. Hervas, Anastasia, 2021. "Mapping oil palm-related land use change in Guatemala, 2003–2019: Implications for food security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ye, Xin & Xiang, Ai & Gao, Runyi & Chuai, Xiaowei, 2025. "The impact of spatiotemporal change in cropland use on local urban cereal supply in China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Valentin Guye, 2025. "Indirect Land use Change Mechanisms: Tests from Biofuel Mandates and Pantropical Agriculture," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(12), pages 3329-3365, December.
    3. Ting Hua & Xiangping Hu & Gunnar Austrheim & James D. M. Speed & Bob van Oort & Francesco Cherubini, 2025. "Reconciling crop production, climate action and nature conservation in Europe by agricultural intensification and extensification," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Peter Woods Ellis & Aaron Marr Page & Stephen Wood & Joseph Fargione & Yuta J. Masuda & Vanessa Carrasco Denney & Campbell Moore & Timm Kroeger & Bronson Griscom & Jonathan Sanderman & Tyson Atleo & R, 2024. "The principles of natural climate solutions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Long, Yuqiao & Sun, Jing & Colinet, Gilles & Peng, Jian & Wellens, Joost & Dong, Xiuchun & Wang, Chuya & Huang, Ping & Wu, Wenbin & Meersmans, Jeroen, 2025. "Recultivating abandoned cropland intensifies the trade-off between climate change mitigation and food security within the Yangtze River Basin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    7. Tonini, Davide & Vadenbo, Carl & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard, 2017. "Priority of domestic biomass resources for energy: Importance of national environmental targets in a climate perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-309.
    8. Lotze-Campen, Hermann & von Witzke, Harald & Noleppa, Steffen & Schwarz, Gerald, 2015. "Science for food, climate protection and welfare: An economic analysis of plant breeding research in Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 79-84.
    9. Iriarte, Alfredo & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2012. "Transition towards a more environmentally sustainable biodiesel in South America: The case of Chile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 263-273.
    10. Knut Einar Rosendahl & Jon Strand, 2011. "Carbon Leakage from the Clean Development Mechanism," The Energy Journal, , vol. 32(4), pages 27-50, October.
    11. Yu-Kun Wang & Shuhai Wen & Nantao Liu & Yun-Yun Hao & Long Chen & Jiao Feng & Yanxu Zhang & Xun Wang & Yu-Rong Liu, 2026. "Staple crops as a key hub of biogeochemical mercury cycle across China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Kriegler, Elmar, 2011. "Comment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 594-596, July.
    13. Proost, Stef & Van Dender, Kurt, 2012. "Energy and environment challenges in the transport sector," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 77-87.
    14. repec:fpr:ifprib:2012ghienglish is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Shixiong Song & Siyuan Zhao & Ye Zhang & Yongxi Ma, 2023. "Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Inputs in China over the Past Three Decades," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Canabarro, N.I. & Silva-Ortiz, P. & Nogueira, L.A.H. & Cantarella, H. & Maciel-Filho, R. & Souza, G.M., 2023. "Sustainability assessment of ethanol and biodiesel production in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Guatemala," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Jia Chen & Kuan Zhang, 2024. "Analysis on the spatiotemporal pattern and driving force of the spatial deviation index of grain and economy in counties in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Baral, Nabin & Rabotyagov, Sergey, 2017. "How much are wood-based cellulosic biofuels worth in the Pacific Northwest? Ex-ante and ex-post analysis of local people's willingness to pay," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 99-106.
    19. Baka, Jennifer & Roland-Holst, David, 2009. "Food or fuel? What European farmers can contribute to Europe's transport energy requirements and the Doha Round," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2505-2513, July.
    20. Nguyen, Thu Lan T. & Hermansen, John E. & Mogensen, Lisbeth, 2010. "Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2561-2571, May.
    21. Sarah Jansen & William Foster & Gustavo Anríquez & Jorge Ortega, 2021. "Understanding Farm-Level Incentives within the Bioeconomy Framework: Prices, Product Quality, Losses, and Bio-Based Alternatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.