IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v164y2026ics0264837726000426.html

The grain-green tension in China's land transfer

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Liping
  • Zhang, Yingnan

Abstract

Land transfer is an essential strategy for the sustainable utilization of arable land, representing a significant advancement in securing national food security. This study, uses data from 1382 households in the 2015–2019 China Rural Household Panel Survey (CRHPS), applies a two-way fixed effects model to assess the impact of land transfer on grain production and the agricultural environment, alongside the mechanisms driving these effects. The findings reveal a discrepancy between economic and environmental efficiencies resulting from land transfers. There is a tension between enhancing grain production and reducing the use of fertilizers and pesticides. Further analysis shows that land transfers contribute positively to the reduction of chemical inputs; Specifically, a 1 % increase in the land transfer rate corresponds to a reduction of 7.87 yuan per unit of arable land in total input costs for fertilizers and pesticides. Conversely, land transfer adversely affects grain production, with a 1 % increase in the land transfer rate leading to an 11.23 yuan decrease in the grain output value per unit of arable land. Therefore, it is essential to accelerate the transformation of agricultural production techniques. A shift from conventional farming practices to more diversified farming systems is necessary to promote sustainable agricultural production.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Liping & Zhang, Yingnan, 2026. "The grain-green tension in China's land transfer," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000426
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000426
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.